Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
D2255 – Standard Test Method Technical Guide
📜 Historical Context and Board Development
The Yarn Appearance Standards for cotton were first adopted in 1938 and have undergone several revisions to improve grading accuracy and reproducibility. The original 1964 boards had different yarn sizes for the four-grade exhibits on each board, which distorted comparisons between grades. The 1975 revision of the Series III board addressed this by using the same yarn number for all four grades (A, B, C, D). A new board, Series VI, was also developed using a near mid-range yarn number to represent equal steps between adjacent grades. To enhance yarn definition and reproducibility, offset photo printing was adopted. A notable correction was made to the Series II board, as the 1979 edition had the A and B grades not clearly defined and appearing switched.
| 🟦 Board Series | 📐 Year | 🎯 Key Characteristics | ⚡ Grades |
|---|---|---|---|
| Series III (Original) | 1964 | Different yarn numbers per grade | A, B, C, D |
| Series III (Revised) | 1975 | Same yarn number for all grades | A, B, C, D |
| Series VI (New Board) | 1975 | Mid-range number, offset printing | A, B, C, D |
| Series II-79 | 1979 | A and B grades were switched/unclear | A, B, C, D |
| Series II (Corrected) | 1987 | Corrected A/B grades, broader scope | A, B, C, D |
⚠️ Safety and Compliance: This standard does not purport to address all safety concerns. Users are responsible for establishing appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices per Section 1.4.
⚙️ Scope and Grading Factors
Test Method D2255/D2255M specifically covers the grading of singles spun yarns for appearance. It explicitly does not apply to plied yarns. Values are provided in both inch-pound and SI units, but the standard mandates they must be used independently of one another. The appearance grade of a yarn is determined by a composite evaluation of several factors, including unevenness, fuzziness, and neppiness, as observed against standard exhibition boards.
| 🔍 Evaluation Factor | 💡 Description | ⚡ Grading Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Unevenness | Irregularities in the linear density or diameter of the yarn. | Major indicator of quality; affects the overall board comparison. |
| Fuzziness | Loose or protruding fibers on the yarn surface. | Indicates fiber cohesion and twist efficiency. |
| Neppiness | Presence of small knots or entangled fiber clusters (neps). | Critical for appearance; high neppiness lowers grade. |
Originally designed for 100% cotton combed or carded yarns, a worldwide survey in 1987 revealed widespread use for yarn blends and various spinning systems (ring spun, open-end). This prompted a revision of the method to formally include grading of all single spun yarns. The boards serve a dual purpose in industry: process quality control and customer acceptance.
💡 Technical Note: The 1987 revision broadened the scope of the standard. The boards are now used for grading yarn blends, ring spun yarns, open-end spun yarns, and other spinning systems.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
🔍 What is the primary scope of D2255?
The standard covers the grading of singles spun yarns for appearance. It specifically does not apply to plied yarns.
💡 What key factors determine the appearance grade of a yarn?
Grade evaluation is a composite assessment of unevenness, fuzziness, and neppiness compared to standard boards.
⚡ Why were the Series II boards corrected in 1987?
The 1979 Series II board had the A and B grades not clearly defined, appearing to be switched. This was corrected in the 1987 edition.
📌 How should the unit systems in the standard be applied?
Values are stated in both inch-pound and SI units. They are not exact equivalents and must be used independently to avoid non-conformance.