Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
D1965-87 – Standard Test Method Technical Guide
The ASTM D1965 – 87 (Reapproved 1998) standard outlines the definitive referee test method for determining the amount of unsaponifiable matter in natural and synthetic drying oils, fatty acids, and polymerized fatty acids utilized in protective coatings. This analysis is critical for ensuring product purity and detecting contamination by hydrocarbons.
📜 Scope, Terminology, and Significance
Scope: This test method applies to all drying oils (natural and synthetic), their fatty acids, and polymerized fatty acids used in paints, varnishes, and related materials.
Definition: According to Section 3.1.1 of the standard, unsaponifiable matter is defined as substances frequently found dissolved in fatty acids that cannot be saponified by sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide under the prescribed conditions. These substances are soluble in ordinary fat solvents and include higher aliphatic alcohols, sterols, pigments, and hydrocarbons.
Significance: The major components of drying oils react with alkali to form water-soluble soaps. This test method isolates the material that is NOT saponified and extracts it with petroleum ether. While a small amount of unsaponifiable matter is normal, a large amount indicates contamination, often from mineral oils or hydrocarbon resins.
⚡ Important Technical Note on Solvent Choice: The exact amount of unsaponifiable matter obtained is governed by the partition coefficient between the soap solution and the solvent. The standard specifies petroleum ether as the extraction solvent in Section 4.3, noting that different results will be obtained if another solvent, such as ethyl ether, is used.
⚙️ Essential Apparatus and Reagent Requirements
The accuracy of this determination depends on specialized glassware and the high purity of reagents. Specific requirements from Sections 5 and 6 are detailed below.
| 🟦 Apparatus Component | 📐 Key Specification | 🎯 Specific Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Extraction Cylinder | Graduations at 40, 80, 130 mL | Glass-stoppered, approx. 300 mm x 35 mm |
| Flasks | Erlenmeyer or Soxhlet type | 100 to 200-mL capacity |
| Separatory Funnels | Standard design | 500-mL capacity |
| Siphon | Glass construction | Suitable for solvent transfer |
| 🧪 Reagent Category | 📏 Quality Standard | ⚡ Governing Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Analytical Chemicals | Reagent Grade | ACS Specifications (Section 6.1) |
| Dilution/Extraction Water | Reagent Water | ASTM D1193 (Section 6.2) |
📊 Understanding and Applying the Test Method
Per Section 4.3, this test method is the designated referee method for unsaponifiable content. The procedure involves saponifying the sample, extracting the unsaponifiable matter with petroleum ether in the specifically graduated extraction cylinder, and weighing the residue after evaporation.
The exact acceptable ranges for unsaponifiable matter are not stated within this general test method but are found in the relevant product specifications for specific drying oils or fatty acids (see Note 1 of the standard). Users should consult these material-specific standards for appropriate pass/fail criteria.
⚠️ Safety Disclaimer: This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
🔍 What is formally considered “unsaponifiable matter” in this context?
It includes substances like higher aliphatic alcohols, sterols, pigments, and hydrocarbons that are soluble in the fatty oil but cannot be saponified by alkali under the specific conditions of this test method.
💡 Why is the unsaponifiable matter content important for quality control?
A baseline, small amount is normal for drying oils. A high level is a primary indicator of contamination, typically with mineral oils or hydrocarbon resins, which can severely degrade coating performance.
⚡ Why must the extraction cylinder be graduated at exactly 40, 80, and 130 mL?
These specific volume markings are critical for the quantitative extraction and washing steps of the referee method, ensuring the correct ratios of saponification mixture, wash water, and solvent are maintained for reproducibility.
📌 What is the standard grade for the water used in this method?
Per Section 6.2, any reference to water in the standard implies the use of reagent water conforming to ASTM Specification D1193.