Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Understanding SAE J350-2020: A Practical Guide to Spark Arrester Testing for Medium Size Engines
The SAE J350-2020 recommended practice outlines standardized procedures for evaluating spark arresters used on medium-size internal combustion engines. Whether you are involved in compliance testing or product development, understanding this standard is essential to ensure consistent fire protection across mobile, stationary, and transportable applications. This guide covers the key equipment, test procedures, and common pitfalls to help you achieve reliable results.
Key Test Equipment and Setup
The test apparatus consists of a blower (or engine exhaust for engine tests), flow measurement instruments, a carbon injector, the test spark arrester, and a positive trap chamber. Proper setup is critical to avoid biasing results. The arrester must be mounted in the same orientation as intended for use, and the inlet duct should match the arrester’s normal installation size. A piezometer ring or probe measures differential pressure across the arrester, and a calibration run without the arrester is required to correct recorded data. All flow measurements must maintain ±5% accuracy.
Test carbon must conform to SAE J997 and be introduced via a feeder that does not crush the particles. The positive trap’s outlet screen should have sufficient cross-sectional area to minimize back pressure. Before testing, verify there is no pulverization of carbon at the highest flow point.
Test Procedure and Data Collection
The procedure begins with a sample run to determine the mass of test carbon needed. Using the sample run, the corrected airflow at 1 psi back pressure is calculated; the required carbon mass is that flow (in appropriate units) multiplied by 0.2 g, subject to a minimum of 25 g and maximum of 200 g. The actual test uses five flow points: 10%, 32.5%, 55%, 77.5%, and 100% of the flow at 1 psi differential pressure. Each point is run separately with both SAE coarse and fine carbon, with a uniform injection rate over 15 ± 5 minutes.
Data collected includes the weight of carbon injected (Ws) and that retained on a No. 30 sieve (Wt), airflow, temperature, inlet pressure, and differential pressure. Effectiveness is calculated and plotted against back pressure. Points that deviate from a smooth curve must be rejected and re-run. For low-flow conditions where velocity is insufficient to carry all carbon into the arrester, Ws is determined from material collected in the trap plus cleaned from the arrester.
| Flow Point (% of flow at 1 psi) | Carbon Type | Injection Duration | Key Checks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10% | Coarse and Fine | 15 ± 5 min | Check low-flow particle capture |
| 32.5% | Coarse and Fine | 15 ± 5 min | Uniform injection |
| 55% | Coarse and Fine | 15 ± 5 min | Ensure no carbon build-up |
| 77.5% | Coarse and Fine | 15 ± 5 min | Monitor differential pressure |
| 100% | Coarse and Fine | 15 ± 5 min | Validate calibration correction |
Screen Type Arresters and Design Insights
For screen-type spark arresters, the standard requires the effective exhaust area (total screen openings) be at least 200% of the total exhaust port area. This ensures minimal back pressure and adequate performance. The endurance test for screen types includes recording cleaning intervals if necessary.
Design insight 🔍: The multiple flow points (10% to 100% of back pressure flow) provide a characterization of arrester effectiveness across the operating range. Uniform carbon injection at a rate that does not disturb airflow is essential. The standard emphasizes that arresters should not be used above their rated flow unless explicitly tested at the intended condition. Rejecting data points that do not fall on a smooth effectiveness curve encourages rigorous quality control.
⚠️ Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Using test carbon that does not conform to SAE J997 or that has been pulverized by the injector.
- Skipping the differential pressure calibration run without the arrester.
- Failing to maintain constant airflow during the carbon feed cycle.
- Incorrect calculation of test carbon mass – use the corrected flow at 1 psi times 0.2 g.
- Not adjusting Ws for low flow conditions where not all carbon enters the arrester.
- Plotting data without rejecting points that do not form a smooth curve.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is the correct amount of test carbon for a test run?
- The amount is determined from a sample run. Calculate the corrected airflow at 1 lbf/in² gage back pressure and multiply by 0.2 g. The result must be between 25 g and 200 g. Use this mass for each test point with coarse and fine carbon.
- How is differential pressure data corrected?
- A calibration run is performed over the anticipated airflow range with no spark arrester installed. The indicated pressure vs. airflow curve is plotted and used to correct all subsequent measurements recorded with the arrester in place.
- Can an arrester tested on one engine be used on a larger engine?
- The standard states that an arrester qualified by an engine test should only be used on engines of the same design and size (or smaller) that do not exceed the calculated flow rate of the test engine by more than 15%. Using an arrester above its rated flow requires additional testing at the intended flow.
- What should be done if test data points do not fall on a smooth effectiveness curve?
- Points that deviate significantly should be rejected, and the corresponding test runs repeated. The standard advises that any data point within 2% of the minimum allowable effectiveness justifies collecting additional intermediate points.
Note: SAE J350-2020 focuses on evaluating spark arrester effectiveness for fire prevention. It does not address flame arresting, exhaust gas cooling, or isolation from explosive gases. Always verify that the tested arrester meets the specific requirements of your application.
