Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Understanding SAE J1988-2020: Residual Aligning Moment Test for Tire Pull Analysis
In the realm of vehicle dynamics, tire pull — the tendency of a vehicle to drift from a straight path — is a critical factor influencing driver satisfaction and safety. SAE J1988-2020, Residual Aligning Moment Test, provides a standardized laboratory method to quantify the forces and moments that cause tire pull. This recommended practice, stabilized in 2020, remains a valuable reference for research, development, and modeling, even as the industry adopts proprietary methods. Below, we explore the key aspects of the standard, from its definitions to practical engineering insights.
The Purpose and Scope of SAE J1988-2020
SAE J1988-2020 is formally described as a recommended practice for determining tire pull force properties for an uninclined tire on a laboratory flat surface force and moment machine. It is suitable for passenger and light-truck tires and defines steady-state, free-rolling pull effects ascribable to tires. The standard outlines procedures to measure residual aligning moment and lateral force at zero slip angle under both left and right rotations, enabling the separation of tire asymmetries into two fundamental components: conicity and plysteer.
Originally issued in 1994 and stabilized in 2020, the document reflects the committee’s view that, while few active users remain, the methodology remains technically sound. Stabilization means the standard is no longer periodically reviewed, but users remain responsible for verifying its applicability and checking for newer technologies. The core test method is still widely referenced in tire R&D, especially for building vehicle dynamics models that require accurate trim and pull predictions.
🛠️ Key Insight: Even though SAE J1988-2020 is stabilized, its approach to isolating conicity and plysteer effects through left and right rotation testing is fundamentally sound. For teams developing new force and moment procedures, this standard offers a clear and proven baseline for comparative tire evaluation.
Breaking Down the Test: Key Definitions and Procedures
The standard introduces specific terminology and mathematical definitions to characterize tire behavior. A central concept is the separation of intrinsic tire asymmetry into two parts: plysteer (which does not change sign with rotation direction relative to the tire axis system) and conicity (which changes sign with rotation direction). By measuring aligning moment and lateral force at zero slip angle in both left and right rotations, engineers can compute parameters like Plysteer Residual Aligning Moment (PRAT), Conicity Residual Aligning Moment (CRAT), and their corresponding force components.
The following table summarizes the primary symbols and their meanings as defined in the standard:
| Symbol | Defined Term | Brief Description |
|---|---|---|
| AL0 | Aligning Moment at Zero Slip Angle (Left Rotation) | Measured aligning moment when tire rotates left (counterclockwise viewed from face) |
| AR0 | Aligning Moment at Zero Slip Angle (Right Rotation) | Measured aligning moment when tire rotates right |
| AP | Plysteer Aligning Moment | Average of AL0 and AR0 – does not change direction with rotation |
| CRAT | Conicity Residual Aligning Moment | Component that changes sign with rotation; isolates conicity effect on aligning moment |
| PRAT | Plysteer Residual Aligning Moment | Aligning moment of a tire without conicity when lateral force of that tire is zero |
| LL0 / LR0 | Lateral Force at Zero Slip Angle (Left/Right Rotation) | Lateral force contributions in each rotation direction |
| CLF | Conicity Lateral Force | Lateral force component that changes direction with rotation |
| PLF | Plysteer Lateral Force | Average of LL0 and LR0; changes direction with respect to tire face but not axis system |
| AS / CS | Aligning Stiffness / Cornering Stiffness | Derivatives at zero slip angle; averaged from left and right rotation data |
The test procedure involves the use of a flat-surface force and moment machine meeting stringent specifications for surface flatness, temperature control, speed accuracy, and rigidity. The tire is tested at zero inclination angle and slip angle while operating at specified normal load and inflation pressure. Data is collected in both left and right rotation sequences to allow the separation of conicity and plysteer effects. The standard emphasizes that all wheels and fixtures deflect under load, so the effective slip and inclination angles differ from nominal settings; engineers must account for this.
Engineering Applications and Design Insights
Understanding and measuring residual aligning moment is crucial for vehicle design and tire development. The ability to quantify conicity and plysteer contributions allows engineers to:
- Predict and minimize vehicle pull, improving driver comfort and reducing steering corrections.
- Optimize tire construction symmetry to reduce manufacturing variability.
- Provide accurate input data for multi-body dynamics models to simulate trim and handling.
- Compare tire designs objectively for research and development purposes.
One of the main design insights from the standard is that plysteer effects are fundamentally related to the tire’s internal structure (e.g., belt angles), while conicity arises from geometric asymmetries (e.g., mismatched bead diameters or misalignment in curing). The averaging technique described — using left and right rotation data to extract a “tire without conicity” — is a powerful tool for isolating these two effects. This methodology remains a foundation for modern force and moment characterization.
⚠️ Common Mistakes to Avoid:
- Using a single rotation direction to evaluate pull — this cannot separate conicity from plysteer.
- Misinterpreting rotation sense: “Left Rotation” is counterclockwise when viewing the tire face; assuming otherwise can reverse signs and corrupt results.
- Forgetting to account for system flexibility and angle bias between test machines. Data from different machines must be correlated carefully.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is residual aligning moment?
Residual aligning moment is the torque about the vertical tire axis that exists when the tire is free rolling straight ahead (zero slip angle, zero inclination). It is one of the primary causes of tire pull and arises from asymmetries in the tire’s construction and geometry.
How does the standard separate conicity from plysteer?
The test measures aligning moment and lateral force at zero slip angle in both left and right rotations. Since conicity effects change sign when the rotation direction is reversed, while plysteer effects do not, simple averaging and subtraction isolate each component. PRAT and CRAT are respectively the non-reversing and reversing portions of residual aligning moment.
Why are both left and right rotation tests necessary?
A single rotation measurement cannot distinguish between conicity and plysteer. By testing both directions, engineers obtain a complete picture of the tire’s asymmetry. For instance, a tire that pulls right when mounted on the left side of a vehicle may exhibit different behavior when mounted on the right side; the dual rotation data explains this fully.
Is SAE J1988-2020 still relevant for modern tire testing?
Yes, especially for research and modeling. While many companies now use proprietary force and moment methods that are not published, the principles established in J1988 remain technically valid and are often embedded within newer procedures. The standard provides a well-documented, transparent baseline that is particularly useful for comparative evaluations and for teams starting their tire dynamics validation.
Note: Always refer to the latest version of SAE J670e (Vehicle Dynamics Terminology) for the tire axis system and foundational definitions when implementing this test method.
