Understanding CAN CGSB 4.2 No. 32.1-98 (2013): Standard for Resistance to Slippage of Yarns in Woven Fabrics

A comprehensive guide to the Canadian standard for seam slippage testing in textile quality assurance

CAN CGSB 4.2 No. 32.1-98 (2013) is a Canadian national standard developed by the Canadian General Standards Board (CGSB) that specifies a test method for determining the resistance of yarns to slippage at a seam in woven fabrics. Often referred to as the seam slippage test, this standard is essential for evaluating the dimensional stability and structural integrity of woven textiles under tensile stress. The latest reaffirmation (2013) confirms its continued relevance in the textile and apparel industry.

Scope and Application

This standard outlines two principal procedures for measuring yarn slippage in woven fabrics:

  • Procedure A — Determination of the force required to produce a specified seam opening (e.g., 3 mm or 6 mm).
  • Procedure B — Determination of the seam opening after applying a specified force (e.g., 100 N or 200 N).

The method is applicable to woven fabrics, including those with wales and courses, but is not intended for non-woven or knitted structures unless specifically agreed upon by the contracting parties. The test is performed in both warp (lengthwise) and weft (crosswise) directions to evaluate the fabric’s resistance to seam slippage, which directly affects garment performance—particularly in areas subject to stress such as armholes, seat seams, and pocket corners.

Key advantage: The standard provides a reproducible and objective measure of seam integrity, enabling manufacturers to compare fabric lots and verify compliance with product specifications.

Technical Requirements and Test Procedures

Apparatus and Conditioning

The test requires a constant-rate-of-extension (CRE) tensile testing machine equipped with a load cell capable of measuring forces up to at least 500 N with an accuracy of ±1%. Specimens must be conditioned in a standard atmosphere of 20 ± 2°C and 65 ± 4% relative humidity for a minimum of 24 hours prior to testing, in accordance with CAN/CGSB 4.2 No. 2 (or ISO 139).

Specimen Preparation

Test specimens are cut to 100 mm × 200 mm, with the longer dimension parallel to the direction of testing. A seam is sewn across the center of the specimen using a plain seam construction with specified thread (e.g., 100% polyester spun thread, ticketed size 24/3) and a stitch length of 10 stitches per 25 mm. Seam allowance is 10 mm. A minimum of five warp and five weft specimens are required for each test direction.

Tip: Use conditioned seam tape or a standardized sewing machine to maintain consistent seam tension. Any distortion in the seam line will directly affect the slippage values.

Test Conditions

Recommended test parameters per CAN CGSB 4.2 No. 32.1-98 (2013)
Parameter Requirement
Specimen width 100 mm
Specimen length 200 mm
Stitch length 10 stitches/25 mm (2.5 mm/stitch)
Seam allowance 10 mm
Testing speed 100 mm/min
Conditioning 20 ± 2°C, 65 ± 4% RH
Number of specimens 5 warp / 5 weft (minimum)

Procedure

Each specimen is mounted in the tensile tester with the seam centered between the clamps. The jaw separation is set to 75 mm. The specimen is pulled at a constant rate of 100 mm/min until a predetermined seam opening (e.g., 3 mm or 6 mm) is reached, and the corresponding force is recorded. Alternatively, for Procedure B, the force is applied up to a specified level, and the seam opening is measured. The mean force (or opening) for each direction is reported.

Caution: Regularly verify the calibration of the tensile tester and the displacement transducer that measures seam opening. Even small deviations can cause significant errors in the reported slippage force.

Implementation Highlights

Successful implementation of CAN CGSB 4.2 No. 32.1-98 (2013) requires attention to several practical details:

  • Seam construction: The thread type, tension, and needle size must be standardized between operators. Any variation may lead to inconsistent seam formation and unreliable test results.
  • Specimen orientation: Ensure that the direction of testing is clearly marked (warp or weft). For fabrics with directional designs, the specimen should be taken from areas free of intentional distortions.
  • Curved fabrics: For garments with curved seams, the standard advises using the procedure that best simulates the end-use configuration, though the flat specimen method remains the primary reference.
  • Alternative opening criteria: For heavy-duty fabrics (e.g., denim, upholstery), a 6 mm opening is often used instead of 3 mm to obtain more meaningful results.
Common mistake: Using an incorrect stitch type or thread tension can produce seams that are either too tight (causing thread breakage before slippage) or too loose (causing early slippage not representative of the fabric). Always verify seam quality before testing.

Compliance Notes and Quality Assurance

Compliance with CAN CGSB 4.2 No. 32.1-98 (2013) is often required for Canadian government procurement and for textile products sold in Canada. Key compliance points include:

  • Precision: Interlaboratory studies cited in the standard indicate a coefficient of variation between 5% and 12% for seam slippage force measurements. Laboratories should participate in round-robin tests to ensure reproducibility.
  • Seasonal fluctuations: Ambient humidity changes can affect fabric dimensional stability; testing must always be performed under standard atmospheric conditions to obtain comparable results.
  • Reference standards: CAN CGSB 4.2 No. 32.1 is technically equivalent to ISO 13936-1 and closely aligned with ASTM D1683. However, differences in seam allowance and stitch density may yield slightly different absolute values.

For quality control purposes, it is recommended to establish internal action limits (e.g., ±1.5 times the standard deviation of the historical mean) to detect shifts in fabric behavior due to changes in yarn tension, weaving variables, or finishing treatments.

Best practice: Document all test conditions, including machine calibration dates, lot numbers of thread used, and the specific procedure (A or B) and opening criteria. This traceability is vital for resolving disputes and maintaining certification.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the difference between Procedure A and Procedure B in CAN CGSB 4.2 No. 32.1-98 (2013)?
A: In Procedure A, the force required to reach a predetermined seam opening (e.g., 3 mm or 6 mm) is measured. In Procedure B, a predetermined force is applied, and the resulting seam opening is measured. Procedure A is used when the maximum allowable opening is specified, while Procedure B is used when the service load is known.
Q: Does this standard apply to knit fabrics?
A: The standard explicitly states it is intended for woven fabrics. For knitted or non-woven materials, alternative test methods (such as ISO 13936-2 for knit fabrics) should be consulted unless a specific agreement is made between the buyer and seller.
Q: How does CAN CGSB 4.2 No. 32.1-98 (2013) compare to ASTM D1683?
A: Both standards measure seam slippage, but they differ in specimen dimensions, seam allowances, and stitch length requirements. CAN CGSB 4.2 No. 32.1 uses a 100 mm wide specimen with a 10 mm seam allowance, while ASTM D1683 typically uses a 50 mm wide specimen with a 12.5 mm seam allowance. Results between the two may not be directly interchangeable.
Q: Is it necessary to test both warp and weft directions?
A: Yes, unless a specific direction is excluded by the product specification. Warp and weft often exhibit different slippage behaviour, and both must be evaluated to fully characterize the fabric.

© 2026 CGSB Standards Review. This article is current as of 2026 and reflects the CAN CGSB 4.2 No. 32.1-98 (2013) edition. Consult the official CGSB document for the complete text.

📥 Standard Documents Download

🔒
Please wait 10 seconds, the download links will appear after the ad loads

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *