Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Rolling resistance is a key parameter influencing tire efficiency and vehicle fuel economy. The SAE J1270-2017 information report provides essential background and guidance on measuring rolling resistance for passenger car, light truck, and highway truck and bus tires. This article covers the three primary measurement methods, important equipment considerations, and practical insights from the standard to help engineers achieve accurate and comparable results.
The force, torque, and power methods are all in common use and should yield the same test results when applied correctly. Each method has distinct advantages and disadvantages, primarily related to parasitic losses and measurement complexity.
| Method | Principle | Parasitic Losses Included | Key Advantage | Key Disadvantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Force | Measures spindle force and loaded radius | Spindle bearing and aerodynamic losses | Lowest parasitic losses; direct force measurement | Requires compensation for load misalignment and crosstalk; needs loaded radius |
| Torque | Measures input torque and divides by test wheel radius | Test wheel rotational losses, spindle losses | Direct measurement of rolling resistance net torque | Parasitic losses can be as large as rolling resistance; speed-hunting oscillations possible |
| Power | Measures electrical power input to drive system | Electrical losses plus all mechanical parasitic losses | No force or torque transducer needed; uses simple electrical measurements | Highest parasitic losses; sensitive to line voltage fluctuations |
🛠️ Engineering Insight: The test wheel curvature (typically 1.708 m diameter) increases tire deflection compared to a flat surface, resulting in slightly higher rolling resistance values. When comparing results from different test machines, this curvature effect should be considered.
Proper test equipment and environmental control are crucial for repeatable and comparable rolling resistance measurements. Key factors include the test wheel surface, rims, alignment, and ambient temperature.
⚠️ Common Mistake: In the force method, failing to correct for load misalignment can introduce severe errors. Angular offsets as small as 0.005° or fore-aft offsets of 0.02 mm can produce spindle force components misread as rolling resistance. Always implement a misalignment correction technique.
Rolling resistance varies with ambient temperature, and precise control of room temperature is difficult. Referencing measurements to 24 °C (75 °F) allows consistent comparison of results obtained under different thermal conditions.
Capped pressure allows the tire inflation to rise naturally as the tire heats up, reflecting actual road service conditions. Regulated pressure maintains a constant pressure via a rotating union, which is useful for isolating the effects of pressure from other variables.
Rolling resistance is influenced by road texture. The standard selects a medium-coarseness abrasive surface to simulate typical dry, well-maintained public roads. Contamination or wear of the surface adds variability and must be avoided.
In the torque method, parasitic losses include rotational test wheel and spindle bearing losses, which can be of similar magnitude to the rolling resistance itself. Careful measurement and subtraction of these losses are necessary to obtain accurate rolling resistance values.