Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The introduction of non-petroleum based hydraulic fluids—such as biodegradable and synthetic formulations—has created a need for standardized compatibility testing with existing hose elastomers. SAE J2631 provides a systematic method for calculating an Elastomer Compatibility Index (ECI) that quantifies the relative impact of a fluid on nitrile (NBR) and chloroprene (CR) rubber compounds commonly used in hydraulic hose construction.
Traditional hydraulic hose qualification, as defined in SAE J517, uses industry reference fluids like IRM 903 to verify oil resistance. However, these reference fluids represent petroleum-based oils. With the growing adoption of environmentally friendly fluids—esters, polyglycols, and other non-petroleum chemistries—engineers cannot assume identical performance. The additive packages and base stocks in these new fluids can cause unexpected swelling, hardening, or loss of mechanical properties in hose liners. SAE J2631 fills this gap by defining a reproducible test protocol using standard elastomer formulations from ISO 13226.
The test procedure follows ASTM D471 for immersion testing. Standard sheets of NBR and CR are immersed in the candidate fluid at two temperatures (212°F and 250°F) for up to 1008 hours. At intervals of 72, 168, 336, 504, 672, 840, and 1008 hours, the following properties are measured and percent change from unaged values is calculated:
Each property change is assigned a rating using the ranges shown in Table 1.
| Property | % Change Range | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile Strength | 0 to 15 | 1 |
| >15 to 25 | 2 | |
| >25 to 40 | 3 | |
| >40 to 60 | 4 | |
| >60 | 5 | |
| Elongation | 0 to 15 | 1 |
| >15 to 25 | 2 | |
| >25 to 40 | 3 | |
| >40 to 60 | 4 | |
| >60 | 5 | |
| Hardness (points change) | 0 to 5 | 1 |
| >5 to 10 | 2 | |
| >10 to 15 | 3 | |
| >15 to 20 | 4 | |
| >20 | 5 | |
| Volume Swell | -5 to +10 | 1 |
| >+10 to +20 | 2 | |
| >+20 to +30 | 3 | |
| >+30 to +40 | 4 | |
| >+40 | 5 |
The ratings are then multiplied by weighting factors that reflect each property’s importance to hose durability:
ECI = (Rating_Tensile × 1) × (Rating_Elongation × 2) × (Rating_Hardness × 1) × (Rating_Volume × 2)
For example, if the ratings are Tensile=3, Elongation=5, Hardness=2, Volume Swell=2, the calculation is: 3×1 × 5×2 × 2×1 × 2×2 = 3 × 10 × 2 × 4 = 240.
By itself, an ECI number does not dictate hose selection—it must be considered alongside hose construction, operating pressure, temperature, and fluid type. However, the index provides a consistent basis for comparing different fluids. Engineered weighting of elongation and volume swell reflects that both properties are critical to maintaining hose integrity under flexing and pressure cycles. Test reports should include results for both NBR and CR at both temperatures (212°F and 250°F) and multiple time intervals to capture aging trends.
Fluid suppliers are encouraged to publish ECI data for their products, allowing system designers to select hose types with compatible elastomer liners. When the ECI of a candidate fluid falls well outside the range of previously approved fluids, additional qualification testing—such as full hose impulse and burst tests per SAE J343—should be considered.
A high ECI suggests that the fluid causes significant changes in the test elastomers (large volume swell, loss of tensile strength or elongation). It serves as a warning that the fluid may shorten hose service life if used without proper material verification.
These two polymers are widely used in hydraulic hose liners. NBR (nitrile) offers excellent oil resistance, while CR (chloroprene) provides good weathering and flame resistance. Using standardized formulations from ISO 13226 ensures reproducibility across laboratories.
SAE J2631 specifies intervals up to 1008 hours (42 days). Short-term tests (72–168 hours) may indicate initial compatibility, but longer durations are necessary to capture gradual aging effects that can affect hose life in extended service.
The ECI provides a comparative ranking of fluid aggressiveness under controlled conditions, but it cannot replace full system validation. Factors such as hose construction, dynamic flexing, pressure spikes, and temperature cycling all influence real-world durability. Use ECI as a screening tool and follow up with application-specific testing when necessary.
Reference: SAE J2631-2011, “Defining Hydraulic Oil Compatibility with Hydraulic Hose Elastomers.”