Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
SAE J2624 Cancellation: The Shift from Vehicle-Based to Dynamometer Brake Lining Evaluation
🛠️ Background and Purpose of SAE J2624
SAE J2624, “Comprehensive Lining Evaluation – Vehicle,” was a recommended practice issued in 2003 to standardize vehicle-based brake lining evaluation. It provided a procedure for evaluating linings under real-world driving conditions. Despite its original intent, the standard faced multiple challenges that led to its cancellation in June 2013 without replacement.
Reasons for Cancellation
The cancellation of J2624 was based on the following factors:
- Existing robust vehicle testing procedures already cover the same scope, making J2624 redundant.
- Dynamometer-based procedures offer superior repeatability and are preferred for aftermarket lining qualification.
- Difficulty sourcing older vehicles required for the test made the procedure impractical.
- Lack of industry demand – few requests for the standard and no test requests from agencies.
⚠️ Caution: Engineers should not rely on J2624 for current evaluations. The standard is cancelled and should be replaced with active vehicle test methods or dynamometer procedures.
Current Alternatives and Frequently Asked Questions
Today, brake lining evaluation is performed using either vehicle-based testing (e.g., SAE J2788 or other active standards) or dynamometer-based testing (e.g., SAE J2683). The table below highlights key differences between the two approaches.
| Aspect | Vehicle-Based | Dynamometer-Based |
|---|---|---|
| Repeatability | Moderate (environmental & driver variability) | High (controlled conditions) |
| Cost per test | High (vehicle, track, driver) | Moderate (lab setup) |
| Vehicle availability | Problematic for older models | Not required |
| Industry preference (aftermarket) | Low | High |
| Real-world simulation | Direct | Indirect via profiles |
Engineering Design Insight: The shift from vehicle-based to dynamometer testing reflects a broader trend in component validation. For brake lining engineers, mastering dynamometer procedures is essential, while vehicle tests remain useful for final system correlation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was SAE J2624 cancelled?
J2624 was cancelled because robust vehicle testing procedures already existed, dynamometer methods were preferred for aftermarket use, sourcing older vehicles became problematic, and there was little demand for the standard.
What replaced J2624 for brake lining testing?
No single standard replaced J2624. Instead, engineers use active vehicle testing procedures for vehicle-level evaluation and dynamometer-based procedures (e.g., SAE J2683) for aftermarket lining qualification.
Is vehicle testing still relevant for brake lining evaluation?
Yes, vehicle testing remains important for final system validation and for tests that require real-world correlation. However, for development and qualification, dynamometer testing is more efficient and reproducible.
Can I still use J2624 in my test plan?
It is not recommended. The standard is cancelled and not maintained. Using it could result in non-compliance with current industry practices and may not reflect accepted testing methods.
