Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
SAE J1420: Supportive Information Report for the Fuel Economy Measurement Test for Trucks and Buses
This information report is a companion document to SAE J1376, offering background explanations to better understand the fuel economy measurement test procedure for trucks and buses. Developed as part of the SAE/DOT Program, SAE J1420 provides references, data, and rationale behind the test parameters. The primary objective is to enable a simple, safe, and repeatable test that evaluates relative fuel economy between vehicles or the effect of devices.
Understanding the SAE J1420 Test Procedure
The test procedure emphasizes simplicity and practicality. It uses driving patterns (test cycles) that approximate real-world conditions, but it acknowledges that universal cycles are impossible. Instead, the procedure provides three basic cycles: long haul, short haul, and local, which can be combined to meet specific needs.
| Cycle | Description | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Long Haul | Highway driving with minimal stops | Long-distance trucks |
| Short Haul | Mixed driving with some stops | Regional delivery |
| Local | City driving with frequent stops | Urban buses and local delivery |
To ensure repeatability, a control vehicle is run simultaneously with the test vehicle. The control vehicle accounts for changes in ambient conditions, as both vehicles are affected similarly. This method allows good test-to-test repeatability and early detection of errors.
Corrections and Limitations
Observed fuel economy is corrected in two ways: (1) test fuel heating value is corrected to standard fuel heating value, and (2) fuel density is corrected to standard 60°F temperature. However, at the time of writing, no correction factor for ambient temperature and barometric pressure was available. To minimize ambient effects, the test procedure recommends a narrow temperature band.
It is crucial to understand that this test provides relative fuel economy (e.g., percent change) and not absolute mpg under standard ambient conditions. The procedure is designed for comparisons, not for absolute claims.
⚠️ Important: Do not use this procedure to claim absolute fuel economy figures. Only relative comparisons (e.g., percent change) are valid under the test conditions.
Engineering Design Insights
The development of SAE J1420 was guided by practical engineering considerations. The test cycles were kept relatively short and simple to allow many runs in a given time period and to ensure driver safety—complicated cycles could distract drivers. Simplicity also facilitates early detection of test errors and improves repeatability.
The use of a control vehicle is a key design insight. By running a reference vehicle simultaneously, uncontrolled variables (like wind or temperature drifts) are neutralized. This makes the test robust even without full ambient corrections.
Another insight is the recognition that universal test cycles are impossible. Instead, the procedure offers building blocks that can be combined to approximate specific driving needs. For example, a 50% long haul and 50% short haul cycle can be created.
🔍 Design Insight: The test yields relative fuel economy (mpg ratio) rather than absolute values under standard conditions. This pragmatic approach allows meaningful comparisons while acknowledging the difficulty of developing correction factors for all ambient conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can a simple test using driving patterns evaluate relative fuel economy?
The test uses standardized driving cycles that represent common operational patterns. By comparing the fuel consumption of a test vehicle to a control vehicle under the same conditions, relative differences can be reliably measured. The procedure corrects for fuel properties and uses a narrow temperature band to minimize variability.
Why is a control vehicle necessary?
A control vehicle accounts for changing ambient conditions. Since both test and control vehicles are affected similarly by weather or temperature changes, the ratio of their fuel economies remains stable. This allows early detection of errors and improves repeatability without needing complex correction models.
What corrections are applied to the measured fuel economy?
Two corrections are applied: the test fuel’s heating value is corrected to a standard heating value, and the fuel density is corrected to the standard 60°F temperature. No correction for ambient temperature or barometric pressure is currently included, so testing is restricted to a narrow temperature band.
Can this test provide absolute mpg values?
No. The test is designed only for relative comparisons, such as percent change in fuel economy due to a modification. Absolute mpg values under standard ambient conditions cannot be determined unless a reference vehicle with known absolute mpg is used for approximation.
