Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
🫀 PD ISO/TS 22077 is a BSI Published Document covering the medical waveform format in health informatics. Physiological waveforms such as ECG, EEG and blood pressure are core data for clinical diagnosis and monitoring, but because different manufacturers use different storage formats, waveform data has long been difficult to share and interoperate. This series provides a unified encoding framework for medical waveforms: Part 2 specifies the electrocardiography (ECG) waveform format and Part 3 specifies the long term electrocardiography waveform format, both prepared by BSI Technical Committee IST/35 (health informatics) and published in August 2015.
PD ISO/TS 22077 applies to the encoding and interchange of medical waveform data. Part 2 specifies the waveform encoding format for routine (resting) electrocardiography, covering sampling attributes, frame attributes and encoding representation. Part 3 specifies the waveform encoding format for long term electrocardiography (Holter), aimed at continuous recordings of 24 hours or longer, with higher demands on data compression and storage efficiency. The common goal of both parts is to provide a standard exchange language for ECG waveforms across devices and systems.
| Part | Reference | Waveform Type | Typical Scenario |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 2 | PD ISO/TS 22077-2:2015 | Electrocardiography (ECG) | Resting ECG acquisition, diagnosis, EHR |
| Part 3 | PD ISO/TS 22077-3:2015 | Long term ECG | Holter/ambulatory ECG, 24-hour monitoring, remote |
The medical waveform format encoding consists of two levels of description:
In addition, the format defines the representation of patient information, recording device information, lead configuration (e.g. standard 12-lead) and event markers (e.g. arrhythmia events, pacemaker markers), providing context for clinical interpretation and statistical analysis.
Long term ECG (Part 3) targets continuous recordings of 24 hours or longer, whose data volume far exceeds routine resting ECG, so the format has special requirements:
In practice, a balance must be struck between compression ratio and clinical fidelity, ensuring algorithm validity in arrhythmia analysis, ST analysis and other clinical applications.
Applying the medical waveform format in a clinical environment requires attention to several operational points. First, the sampling attributes must truly reflect the acquisition settings: the nominal sampling frequency of the recorder, the gain and offset applied to each channel, and the bit depth determine whether the stored values can be converted back into millivolt signals with diagnostic accuracy. Second, the frame attributes should be populated consistently, because the correlation of events, annotations and time stamps across channels is what allows automated algorithms and clinicians to interpret the record reliably. Third, when data from different devices are merged into a single archive or database, the metadata should be checked for consistency, since different recorders may use different sampling rates or lead configurations. Fourth, for long-term records, time synchronisation between the waveform stream and external event markers (patient diaries, pacemaker markers) is essential for correct interpretation. Fifth, data exchange should reference the standard version in use and document any vendor-specific extensions, so that the receiving system can handle them correctly or at least flag them.
For storage planning, an uncompressed 12-lead record can be large, so Part 3 of the series supports compression choices that must be declared in the primary description. Lossless compression is recommended for research and diagnostic archives, while lossy compression may be acceptable for monitoring and screening provided the clinical fidelity requirements are met and the processing is documented. Finally, privacy considerations apply throughout the lifecycle: de-identification of patient identifiers, access control and audit trails should be implemented before waveforms leave the hospital network, and retention policies should follow national regulations on health records.
In summary, the medical waveform format provides the encoding framework that turns raw physiological signals into interoperable, self-describing clinical data. Adopting it improves the reliability of remote monitoring, supports large-scale research and enables the safe reuse of waveform data across institutions and countries.