Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
SAE J2678-2016 provides the foundation for understanding how in-vehicle navigation systems can be designed to minimize driver distraction. Created by the ITS Safety and Human Factors Committee, this rationale document explains the reasoning behind SAE J2364 and its methods for assessing visual-manual tasks. Although J2678 was cancelled in 2016 and merged into J2365, its insights remain essential for engineers working on route guidance interfaces and driver workload evaluation.
The Navigation Function Accessibility Subcommittee developed J2678 to document the rationale for SAE J2364. The goal was to define safe boundaries for driver interaction with navigation systems, based on human factors principles and consensus from industry experts. The rationale addresses key questions such as how to measure task completion time, what constitutes acceptable visual demand, and how to align with broader guidelines like those from the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and ISO TC22/SC13/WG8.
🛠️ Engineering design insight: Use the static method early in the design stage with mockups or simulations to predict task time. Complement it with interrupted vision (occlusion) methods to evaluate visual demand as the design matures.
J2364 proposes complementary methods that fit different development phases, from early concept to mature prototype. The table below summarizes the relationship among these methods.
| Development Phase | Method | Key Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Preliminary (concept only) | J2365 – Calculation to predict static task time | Estimate driver workload from basic task parameters |
| Early (first mockup or simulation) | Static Method (J2364) + J2365 | Predict total task time using visual-manual steps |
| Mockup or prototype | Interrupted Vision Method (J2364) | Assess visual demand by controlling glance availability |
| Mature design | Alliance 2.1a Glance Behavior / ISO WG8 Occlusion Method | Evaluate real-world glance patterns and occlusion effects |
Each method provides unique insights. The static method is ideal for early trade-offs, while the interrupted vision method captures the effect of real-world glance limitations. Combined, they help ensure that navigation tasks do not overly distract the driver.
J2364 and its rationale align closely with the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers Guidelines (Version 3.0) and the ISO occlusion method work item. The principles emphasize compliance with U.S. and state laws, achieving subcommittee consensus, minimizing driving risk, and following good human factors engineering. The table from the rationale shows that all methods share an interrupted vision component, reinforcing the importance of limiting visual demand.
⚠️ Important note: Although J2678 has been cancelled, its rationale has been incorporated into the revised J2365 (2016). Engineers should refer to J2365 for the current static measurement method and comprehensive human factors guidance.
J2678 documents the reasoning behind SAE J2364, which defines safe boundaries for driver interaction with navigation systems. It explains why specific methods were chosen and how they relate to driver distraction prevention.
In September 2016, J2678 was cancelled because all its rationale material was merged into the updated SAE J2365. J2365 now contains both the static measurement method and the rationale, making a separate document unnecessary.
J2364 includes the static method for early design, the interrupted vision method for evaluating visual demand, and references the Alliance 2.1a and ISO occlusion methods for later stages. These methods complement J2365 for task time calculation.
Start with J2365 to estimate static task time. Use the static method with mockups or simulations to identify high-workload steps. Later, apply the interrupted vision or occlusion methods to verify that visual demand stays within safe limits.