ISO/TR 25743:2010 — Lifts (Elevators): Use for Evacuation During Emergencies

A comprehensive study and decision framework for using lifts for building evacuation during fires, earthquakes, and other emergencies

1. Scope and Risk Assessment Framework of ISO/TR 25743

ISO/TR 25743:2010 investigates the risks and hazards associated with using lifts (elevators) for the evacuation of persons during building emergencies. Historically, lifts have been explicitly excluded from use during fires and other emergencies based on concerns about power loss, smoke ingress, and passenger entrapment. However, modern building design — particularly for high-rise structures, healthcare facilities, and buildings accommodating persons with disabilities — has prompted renewed interest in lift evacuation as a complement to stair evacuation.

The Technical Report provides a structured decision chart methodology that enables building designers, lift engineers, and fire safety professionals to systematically evaluate whether lift evacuation is appropriate for a specific building, what hazards must be addressed, and what technical solutions are required. The decision chart covers 21 distinct risk scenarios organized into four categories: fire-related hazards, non-fire hazards (explosion, chemical, biological), environmental hazards (flood, storm, earthquake), and lift system hazards (power failure, control system failure, mechanical failure).

Hazard CategoryExample ScenariosPrimary Risk to Lift EvacuationRequired Mitigation
Fire-relatedBuilding fire, smoke spreadSmoke ingress into hoistway, loss of powerFire-rated hoistway, lobby protection, backup power
Non-fire (C/B/R)Chemical release, biological attackContaminant ingress, control system vulnerabilityPressurization, filtration, hardened controls
EnvironmentalEarthquake, flood, stormStructural damage, water ingress, power lossSeismic design, water barriers, backup systems
Lift systemPower failure, mechanical jamPassenger entrapment, door failureBattery lowering, manual release, communication
The decision chart in ISO/TR 25743 is designed to be used during the building design phase, not as a post-construction assessment. Integrating lift evacuation considerations early allows for cost-effective implementation of required protection measures such as fire-rated lobbies, backup power systems, and hardened control interfaces.

2. Technical Solutions and Design Requirements

Annex A of the Technical Report provides detailed technical solutions for each of the 21 identified risk scenarios. For fire-related hazards, the key requirements include: a fire-resistant hoistway enclosure with fire resistance rating of at least 60 minutes, a protected lobby at each lift landing with automatic closure and smoke detection, a backup power supply capable of operating the lift for the full evacuation duration (typically 30–120 minutes depending on building height), and a communication system providing real-time status information to passengers and building management.

For non-fire hazards such as chemical or biological agents, the report addresses the need for hoistway pressurization to prevent contaminant ingress, HEPA filtration of lift car ventilation air, and the provision of emergency decontamination procedures. The report emphasizes that the specific technical solutions must be tailored to the risk profile of the building, which is determined through a structured risk assessment process that considers building location, occupancy type, and the likelihood of specific hazard scenarios.

A critical finding of ISO/TR 25743 is that lift evacuation is NOT suitable as the sole means of egress for any building. Stairs must remain the primary evacuation route for occupants who are able to use them. Lift evacuation should be considered as a supplementary means, primarily for persons with disabilities, for very tall buildings where stair descent is physically demanding, and for buildings where specific risk assessments justify lift use.

3. Engineering Design Insights for Lift Evacuation Systems

From an engineering design perspective, implementing lift evacuation requires a holistic approach spanning architectural design, structural engineering, fire protection engineering, and lift system design. One of the most challenging aspects is the coordination between the fire alarm system, the lift control system, and the building management system to ensure correct sequencing of evacuation operations. The lift must be automatically recalled to a designated evacuation floor upon fire alarm activation, with doors opening to allow boarding while preventing access to fire-affected floors.

Another critical design consideration is the water protection of lift installations. Fire sprinkler activation can introduce large volumes of water into the hoistway, potentially causing short circuits, brake failure, and car entrapment. The report recommends that lift evacuation systems include: water drains at the pit bottom with capacity equivalent to the sprinkler system discharge rate, weatherproof enclosures for electrical components located near the pit floor, and a lift car design that prevents water ingress into the passenger compartment during descent through sprinkler-activated floors.

The successful implementation of lift evacuation at the 30 St Mary Axe (The Gherkin) building in London demonstrated the viability of this approach. The building’s fire engineering strategy includes fire-protected lift lobbies with smoke extraction, backup generators supporting evacuation lifts, and a phased evacuation protocol that coordinates stair and lift use. The design was based on principles consistent with ISO/TR 25743, achieving a calculated evacuation time reduction of 35% compared to stair-only evacuation for the building’s full occupancy.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it safe to use lifts during a fire?
A: Conventional lifts are NOT safe during a fire due to potential power loss, smoke ingress into the hoistway, and the risk of the lift car becoming a chimney for smoke propagation. However, lifts specifically designed for evacuation in accordance with ISO/TR 25743 principles — with fire-rated hoistways, protected lobbies, backup power, and firefighter override controls — can provide a significantly safer means of evacuation for specific building types and occupant groups.
What is the maximum building height for which lift evacuation is practical?
A: There is no absolute height limit, but the practicality decreases with height due to the increased evacuation time per lift trip, the larger number of lifts required, and the increased complexity of backup power systems. For buildings over 150 m height, a combination of evacuation lifts, refuge floors, and phased stair evacuation is typically required. The decision depends on specific building design, occupancy, and local regulations.
How does ISO/TR 25743 address the evacuation of persons with disabilities?
A: The report explicitly identifies persons with disabilities as primary beneficiaries of lift evacuation. Key provisions include: lift car dimensions sufficient for wheelchair access, voice communication systems that provide clear instructions, visual indication systems for hearing-impaired persons, and evacuation chairs located at lift lobbies for persons who cannot use stairs independently. The decision chart includes specific branches addressing disability-related evacuation scenarios.
What backup power duration is recommended for evacuation lifts?
A: ISO/TR 25743 recommends a minimum backup power duration of 30 minutes for buildings under 50 m height, 60 minutes for buildings between 50 m and 100 m, and 120 minutes for buildings over 100 m. These durations should be verified by evacuation modelling that considers building occupancy, lift performance, and the specific evacuation strategy.

📥 Standard Documents Download

🔒
Please wait 10 seconds, the download links will appear after the ad loads

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *