Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) hybrid structures combine the complementary strengths of steel and concrete: the steel tube provides tensile strength, confinement to the concrete core, and serves as permanent formwork, while the concrete core enhances compressive capacity and stiffens the steel tube against local buckling. CFST hybrid structures have become increasingly popular in large-span buildings, bridge piers, and high-rise construction due to their excellent seismic performance, high load-bearing capacity, and favorable constructability.
ISO/TR 25439:2025 provides detailed design examples that demonstrate the practical application of ISO 16521 (Design of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) hybrid structures). The document covers two major structural types — trussed CFST hybrid structures and concrete-encased CFST hybrid structures — with step-by-step calculations that follow the design procedure specified in ISO 16521:2024, Clause 6. Each example includes explicit cross-references to the relevant subclauses in ISO 16521, making it an effective training and reference tool.
Four design examples are presented for trussed CFST hybrid structures: a three-chord structure without concrete slab, two four-chord structures without concrete slab (featuring different configurations), and a four-chord structure with a concrete slab. Each example addresses material compatibility (ISO 16521:2024, 5.2.6), requirements for CFST chords (Clause 7.1), and requirements for webs (Clause 15.2.4). The variety of configurations ensures that engineers can find a reference case closely matching their specific design scenario.
| Example | Configuration | Chords | Concrete Slab | Key Design Checks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trussed | 3 chords | No | Cross-section indices, axial compression, bending |
| 2 | Trussed | 4 chords | No | Compression-bending interaction, shear resistance |
| 3 | Trussed | 4 chords | No | Connection detailing, joint resistance |
| 4 | Trussed | 4 chords | Yes | Composite action, slab interaction |
The design procedure progresses through calculation of cross-section indices (strength and stiffness per ISO 16521:2024, 10.3), followed by structural resistance verification including axial compression resistance (Clause 11.2.1), bending resistance (Clause 11.2.2), combined compression and bending (Clause 11.2.3), and shear resistance (Clause 11.3). Protective design considerations cover corrosion resistance (Clause 14.2.2) and impact resistance (Clause 14.4). Each calculation step is demonstrated with numerical values, showing how the theoretical formulae from ISO 16521 are applied with realistic material properties and geometric parameters.
Four additional examples cover concrete-encased CFST hybrid structures: a single-chord structure, a six-chord structure, a four-chord structure with circular CFST members, and a four-chord structure with rectangular CFST members. These examples verify resistances in compression, combined compression and bending, long-term load effects (including creep and shrinkage), and shear in accordance with ISO 16521:2024, Clause 12. Fire resistance calculations follow Clause 14, addressing a critical safety consideration for building applications.
Clause 6 of the standard presents a comprehensive global structural analysis of a concrete-encased CFST hybrid arch structure using a fibre-based model per ISO 16521:2024, Clause 10. The analysis includes load determination, model establishment, load-displacement relationship analysis, deformation analysis, and stress-strain analysis. This example demonstrates how refined analysis methods can capture the nonlinear behavior of CFST structures under extreme loading conditions, accounting for material nonlinearity, geometric nonlinearity, and the confinement interaction between steel tube and concrete core.
Annex A provides experimental data that served as the basis for developing ISO 16521. These published experimental results verify the design methods and provide engineers with benchmark examples for validating their own analysis models against physical test data. The experimental comparisons cover a wide range of member geometries, concrete strengths, steel yield strengths, and loading configurations.
No download files available yet