Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
ISO/TR 25078:2025, prepared by ISO/TC 287 (Sustainable processes for wood and wood-based products), provides calculation examples and background information for determining greenhouse gas displacement potentials when wood-based products are used in place of alternative fossil-intensive materials. The document supports the implementation of ISO 13391-1 and ISO 13391-3, which together define a comprehensive framework for calculating the greenhouse gas dynamics of wood and wood-based products.
The fundamental premise is straightforward: substituting wood-based products for alternatives such as concrete, steel, or plastics can reduce net greenhouse gas emissions because wood stores biogenic carbon and typically requires less fossil energy to produce. However, the actual displacement effect depends on numerous factors including the functional unit definition, system boundaries, geographical context, and market dynamics. ISO/TR 25078 provides worked examples that illuminate these complexities.
The Technical Report presents five detailed calculation examples covering diverse product categories, each illustrating different methodological considerations.
| Example | Wood-Based Product | Alternative Product | Key Methodological Consideration |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wooden pallet | Plastic pallet | Functional equivalence at product level; end-of-life scenarios |
| 2 | Wood-based bioenergy | Fossil energy sources | Carbon neutrality assumption; time horizon for biogenic carbon |
| 3 | Cross-laminated timber (CLT) floor | Concrete floor | System-level functional unit; multi-functionality of building components |
| 4 | Beverage packaging (carton) | Plastic/glass packaging | Recycling rates and cascading use |
| 5 | Building structure (timber frame) | Steel/concrete structure | Whole-building LCA; foundation implications |
The displacement factor for a specific use is calculated using the formula: fD,spec = (mE,ap – mE,w) / (wB,w – wB,ap), where mE,ap represents emissions from the alternative product, mE,w represents emissions from the wood-based product, wB,w is the biogenic carbon in the wood product, and wB,ap is biogenic carbon in the alternative. The resulting factor enables direct comparison across different substitution scenarios.
ISO/TR 25078 emphasizes that displacement factor calculations must be based on transparently documented data sources. Published scientific articles, LCA studies, and Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) are the primary data sources. However, the document cautions that EPD comparisons are only valid when based on the same declared unit with demonstrated functional equivalency and when the conditions for comparing EPDs in ISO 14025 are met.
ISO/TR 25078 dedicates an entire clause to factors that influence whether the calculated displacement potential is actually realized in practice — bridging the gap between theoretical calculations and real-world outcomes.
The displacement potential calculated at the product level may not fully materialize due to market effects. For example, if increased use of wood in construction drives up timber prices, this could reduce demand in other sectors, leading to indirect displacement effects. Similarly, improvements in manufacturing efficiency for alternative products could reduce the displacement advantage over time. The document recommends considering these dynamic market interactions when assessing long-term displacement impacts.
Biogenic carbon storage in wood products is not permanent — it depends on the product’s lifespan and end-of-life fate. A wooden pallet may store carbon for only a few years before being chipped and burned for energy, while a CLT building panel may store carbon for decades or centuries. The time horizon chosen for the analysis significantly affects the calculated displacement factor. ISO/TR 25078 recommends transparent reporting of time assumptions and, where possible, using multiple time horizons to test sensitivity.
The document candidly acknowledges that comparative LCA results can be influenced by methodological choices that favour one material over another. Key sources of bias include: allocation method for co-products, choice of electricity grid mix, assumptions about carbon stock changes in forests, and treatment of biogenic carbon emissions at end-of-life. Engineers conducting displacement analyses should perform sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of their conclusions.
No download files available yet