Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
ISO 29782 specifies test methods for evaluating the cohesive properties of building sealants: their ability to resist internal fracture under tensile, shear, and cyclic loading. Cohesion is governed by the polymer network architecture — the density of cross-links, the molecular weight between cross-links (M_c), and the presence of reinforcing fillers such as fumed silica or calcium carbonate. A well-cured silicone sealant typically exhibits a cohesive tensile strength of 0.6–1.8 MPa and an elongation at break of 200–800 %, depending on the formulation and curing chemistry.
The standard defines four primary tests: tensile cohesion (stress-strain behaviour until rupture), shear cohesion (shear modulus and shear strength), tear resistance (resistance to crack propagation using the trouser-tear or angle-tear geometry), and cyclic fatigue cohesion (resistance to crack growth under repeated loading at a specified strain amplitude). The tensile cohesion test is the most widely specified, providing the full stress-strain curve from which the cohesive modulus (E_c = stress/strain in the linear region), cohesive strength (σ_max), and strain energy density (area under the curve to failure) are derived.
| Parameter | Symbol | Silicone Sealant | Polyurethane Sealant | MS Polymer Sealant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohesive tensile strength | σ_max | 0.8–1.8 MPa | 0.6–1.5 MPa | 0.7–1.6 MPa |
| Elongation at break | ε_break | 300–800 % | 200–600 % | 250–700 % |
| Cohesive modulus (100 %) | E_c(100%) | 0.3–0.6 MPa | 0.4–0.8 MPa | 0.3–0.7 MPa |
| Tear resistance (trouser) | G_tear | 2–6 kN/m | 3–8 kN/m | 2–5 kN/m |
| Fatigue threshold | Δγ_th | 15–25 % | 10–20 % | 12–22 % |
ISO 29782 introduces a cyclic fatigue test that is arguably the most practically relevant method in the standard. A prismatic specimen (25×12×12 mm cross-section) is subjected to 2,000 cycles of tensile-compressive loading at a frequency of 0.1 Hz (6 cycles per minute) at a specified strain amplitude, typically ±12.5 %, ±25 %, or ±50 % of the initial gauge length. The specimen is inspected for crack initiation and growth at 200-cycle intervals. The number of cycles to failure (defined as complete fracture of the specimen) is recorded. The fatigue threshold — the maximum strain amplitude at which the sealant survives 2,000 cycles without failure — is a key design parameter.
The movement capability classification system defined in the standard assigns sealants to classes based on their fatigue performance: Class 12.5 (survives ±12.5 % strain), Class 25 (survives ±25 % strain), and Class 50 (survives ±50 % strain). This classification directly mirrors the ISO 11600 sealant classification system and provides engineers with a clear design basis. A Class 25 sealant, for example, can accommodate a joint movement of ±25 % of the original joint width, which is sufficient for most concrete panel facade joints with a width-to-span ratio of 1:100.
Sealants are viscoelastic materials, and their cohesive properties are inherently dependent on temperature and loading rate. ISO 29782 requires testing at three temperatures: −20 °C, +23 °C, and +70 °C, covering the typical service temperature range for building sealants. At low temperatures, sealants become stiffer and more brittle — the cohesive modulus can increase by a factor of 5–10 compared to room-temperature values. At high temperatures, sealants soften and may exhibit creep under sustained load. The standard specifies a maximum creep deformation of 25 % after 24 hours under a sustained tensile load of 0.1 MPa at 70 °C for structural sealants.
The rate dependence of cohesive strength is quantified through testing at multiple crosshead displacement rates: 1, 5, 50, and 500 mm/min. The results are used to construct a master curve using the time-temperature superposition principle (WLF equation), enabling prediction of cohesive behaviour at loading rates and temperatures not directly tested. This master curve approach is particularly valuable for assessing sealant performance under seismic loading, where strain rates can exceed 100 % per second, compared to the 0.01 % per second typical of thermal movement.