Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
ISO 29463-3:2011 specifies the test method for determining the efficiency of flat sheet filter media used in high-efficiency particulate air filters. This part is essential for filter media manufacturers and quality control laboratories, providing a standardized procedure for evaluating media performance before fabrication into complete filter elements.
| Test Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Media face velocity | 0.1-5.0 cm/s (typical 1.0-2.5 cm/s) |
| Test aerosol | Mono-disperse or poly-disperse (DEHS, DOP, NaCl) |
| Particle size range | 0.02-1.0 um (covering MPPS region) |
| Sample size | Minimum 100 cm2 effective test area |
| Number of samples | Minimum 3 per media lot |
| Air temperature | 23 C +/- 5 C |
| Relative humidity | 50% +/- 15% |
The test apparatus consists of an aerosol generator, filter holder assembly with precisely defined test area, differential pressure transducers, flow measurement system, and particle counting instruments. Two primary test arrangements are specified: one for mono-disperse test aerosol and one for poly-disperse test aerosol with downstream spectrometer or DMA analysis.
The filter holder must provide a leak-free seal around the test specimen without damaging the media edge. The compression mechanism must be carefully designed to avoid media deformation that could alter the measured performance. Face velocity is determined from the measured air flow rate and the effective test area.
The reference test method uses mono-disperse aerosol at multiple particle sizes to determine the complete efficiency curve and identify the MPPS. For routine production testing, a simplified procedure using poly-disperse aerosol with data deconvolution is acceptable, but initial type testing must use the full reference method.
The standard also includes procedures for production testing of media, including differential pressure measurement at specified face velocities and penetration testing using simplified protocols. These methods allow high-throughput quality control while maintaining correlation with the reference method.
Physical property testing of filter media is addressed in Annex C, covering thickness, basis weight, fiber diameter distribution, and porosity. These properties correlate with filtration performance and provide important quality control parameters.
Accurate determination of the filter media face velocity is critical for reliable efficiency measurements. The standard specifies that face velocity should be calculated from the measured volumetric flow rate divided by the effective test area, with corrections for temperature and pressure variations. The differential pressure across the test specimen must be measured using calibrated transducers with an accuracy of +/- 2 Pa or better, with pressure taps located upstream and downstream of the media holder to avoid measuring extraneous pressure losses.
For production testing, the standard allows the use of reference flow conditions to simplify the test procedure, provided that the correlation between the simplified method and the full reference method has been established through initial type testing. The correlation must be re-verified whenever there is a change in media formulation or production process.
The determination of the Most Penetrating Particle Size from flat sheet media test data requires careful analysis of the efficiency versus particle size curve. The standard specifies that efficiency measurements should be made at a minimum of five particle sizes spanning the expected MPPS range, with additional measurements near the MPPS to improve resolution. The MPPS is identified as the particle size at which the minimum efficiency occurs, determined by fitting a polynomial or spline curve to the measured data points and finding the minimum of the fitted curve.
The MPPS determination affects the classification of the filter element that will ultimately be manufactured from the media. An error in MPPS identification of 0.02 um can result in a classification error of one filter class for high-efficiency filters. The standard therefore requires that MPPS determination be based on adequately resolved data with appropriate statistical confidence, and that the test report document the methodology used for MPPS identification including any curve fitting procedures and associated uncertainties.
The test arrangements for mono-disperse and poly-disperse aerosols serve different purposes in filter media characterization. Mono-disperse testing using a DMA-CPC system provides the most accurate determination of efficiency at specific particle sizes, enabling precise MPPS identification. The standard specifies that for mono-disperse testing, the aerosol should have a geometric standard deviation less than 1.15, ensuring that the measured efficiency corresponds to a well-defined particle size. Poly-disperse testing offers faster measurements across the full particle size range in a single test, using either a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) for submicron particles or an optical particle spectrometer for larger particles. The poly-disperse method is more suitable for production quality control where throughput is important, while the mono-disperse method is preferred for type testing and product development. Both methods should give equivalent results when properly implemented, and the standard provides guidance on verifying equivalence. The test report must specify which method was used, enabling appropriate interpretation of the results by filter users and specifying engineers.