Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
ISO 27407:2010 specifies standardized marking of performance characteristics on hydraulic fluid power filters. The standard addresses the critical need for clear, consistent communication of filter performance data between manufacturers and users. Proper marking ensures that replacement filters maintain system cleanliness requirements and that operators can verify filter specifications at a glance.
Filter elements must be marked with: test flow rate, terminal differential pressure, average filtration ratio (βx) for particles larger than the stated size, filter retained capacity to terminal differential pressure, minimum collapse/burst pressure, and differential pressure at rated flow. Markings must be on the filter cartridge or on a permanently attached label.
| Marked Parameter | Definition | Test Standard Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Test flow rate | Flow rate at which performance is determined | ISO 16889 or ISO 4548-12 |
| Terminal differential pressure | Maximum ΔP at which filter is considered spent | ISO 16889 |
| Filtration ratio (βx) | Ratio of upstream to downstream particle counts > x μm | ISO 16889 (multi-pass) |
| Retained capacity | Mass of contaminant retained to terminal ΔP | ISO 16889 |
| Collapse/burst pressure | Minimum housing or element structural limit | ISO 2941 or ISO 2942 |
| ΔP at rated flow | Initial pressure drop at nominal flow | ISO 3968 |
Spin-on filters require additional markings including filter installation procedure (thread size, seal type, torque specification), housing pressure limits (minimum burst pressure, fatigue life cycles), and flow direction indicators. The standard provides examples of marking layouts with graphical symbols for universal comprehension across language barriers.
The standard distinguishes between characteristics determined by multi-pass testing (ISO 16889), collapse/burst pressure testing (ISO 2941), differential pressure versus flow evaluation, and fatigue pressure testing. Each test method has specific marking requirements and reporting formats. Multi-pass test results (β ratio, capacity) are the most critical for contamination control system design.