ISO 27108:2010 — Water Quality — Determination of Pesticides by SPME and GC-MS

Solid-phase microextraction and GC-MS analysis of plant treatment agents and biocides in water

1. Scope and Principle of SPME-GC-MS Method for Water Analysis

ISO 27108:2010 specifies a method for determining selected plant treatment agents and biocide products in drinking water, groundwater, and surface water using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The method achieves determination limits of at least 0.05 micrograms per liter for most target compounds, making it suitable for compliance monitoring against stringent drinking water regulations including the EU Drinking Water Directive and US EPA maximum contaminant levels. The standard was developed by ISO/TC 147/SC 2 to address the growing concern about pesticide contamination of water resources worldwide.

SPME is a solvent-free extraction technique that integrates sampling, extraction, and concentration into a single step. A fused-silica fibre coated with a polymeric adsorbent is immersed directly in the water sample, and analytes partition into the fibre coating based on their equilibrium distribution coefficients. After extraction equilibrium is reached, the fibre is transferred to the GC injector where analytes are thermally desorbed and transferred to the chromatographic column. The solvent-free nature of SPME eliminates solvent disposal costs and exposure risks, and the technique requires only small sample volumes of 8 to 16 milliliters, making it ideal for laboratory and field applications.

SPME is a solvent-free technique combining sampling, extraction, and concentration in one step. A coated fibre is immersed in the water sample, and analytes partition into the coating based on distribution coefficients. After extraction, the fibre goes directly to the GC injector for thermal desorption — no solvent evaporation or concentration steps required.
Compound Class Examples Typical LOQ (micrograms/L) Quantification Ion (m/z)
Triazines Atrazine, Simazine, Terbutylazine 0.01 to 0.05 200, 215
Organochlorines Lindane, Aldrin, Dieldrin 0.01 to 0.03 181, 219
Organophosphates Parathion-methyl, Parathion-ethyl 0.02 to 0.05 263, 109
Other Pesticides Metolachlor, Pendimethalin 0.02 to 0.10 162, 252
Biocides Triclosan 0.02 to 0.10 288, 218

2. Analytical Procedure and Method Validation

The SPME procedure is performed by placing 8 to 16 mL of water sample in a glass vial with a magnetic stir bar, adding sodium chloride to control ionic strength and enhance extraction efficiency through the salting-out effect, and immersing the SPME fibre for a defined extraction time typically ranging from 30 to 60 minutes with constant stirring. Extraction time must be optimized for the target compounds — shorter times may not achieve equilibrium while longer times reduce sample throughput. After extraction, the fibre is withdrawn into the protective needle, transferred to the GC injector, and thermally desorbed at 250 to 280 degrees C. The fibre is then conditioned in a clean injector port to prepare for the next extraction.

GC-MS analysis uses electron impact ionization in selected ion monitoring mode for maximum sensitivity and selectivity. Quantification is performed using internal standard calibration with deuterated analogues of target analytes where available, which corrects for variations in extraction efficiency, injection volume, and mass spectrometer response. The standard provides comprehensive data including retention times, mass spectra, and quantification and confirmation ions for all target compounds in informative annexes. The method must be validated for each laboratory’s specific instrument configuration, with acceptable performance criteria defined for linearity, precision, accuracy, and detection limits.

Carry-over between samples is a known issue in SPME analysis. The standard recommends including a blank run after every 10 samples and implementing a fibre conditioning step between extractions. Fibre condition must be monitored using quality control standards — fibre damage or coating degradation is a common source of method failure.

Calibration is performed using standard solutions prepared in reagent water, with the calibration range covering the expected concentration range in real samples. The standard recommends a minimum of five calibration levels plus a blank. Linearity is assessed through the correlation coefficient of the calibration curve, which should be at least 0.99. If any compound shows significant matrix effects in real samples, standard addition calibration or matrix-matched calibration should be used instead of external standard calibration.

3. Engineering Insights for Environmental Analysis Laboratories

The SPME-GC-MS method offers significant advantages over traditional liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction methods. Solvent consumption is virtually eliminated, reducing both cost and environmental impact. Sample volumes are much smaller — 8 to 16 mL compared to 200 to 1000 mL for SPE methods. Sample preparation time per analysis is comparable for automated systems, but SPME eliminates solvent evaporation and reconstitution steps required in SPE. However, SPME has some limitations: extraction is equilibrium-based rather than exhaustive, so extraction efficiency depends on fibre type, extraction time, temperature, and matrix composition. Quantification must be performed carefully accounting for these factors.

Matrix effects are more pronounced in surface water and wastewater analysis due to dissolved organic matter and suspended particles that can compete for fibre binding sites or alter distribution coefficients. The standard recommends matrix-matched calibration or standard addition for complex samples. Salinity effects must be controlled through consistent addition of sodium chloride to all samples, standards, and blanks. The addition of salt not only controls ionic strength variation between samples but also enhances extraction efficiency for many analytes through the salting-out effect. Fibre selection is critical — the standard specifies 100 micrometer PDMS for non-polar compounds and 65 micrometer PDMS/DVB for more polar analytes.

For routine monitoring programmes, SPME can reduce per-sample analysis costs by 40 to 60 percent compared to SPE methods while maintaining comparable sensitivity for most GC-amenable pesticides. The reduced sample volume also means less sample transport and storage requirements, a significant advantage for large-scale monitoring studies.

The standard includes informative annexes with gas chromatograms, mass spectra, and precision data from interlaboratory studies. These resources are valuable for method development and troubleshooting. The mass spectra in particular help analysts confirm compound identity when retention time shifts occur due to column aging or instrument maintenance. The standard notes that applicability can be extended to other compounds not explicitly listed, but full validation is required including linearity, precision, accuracy, and detection limit studies for each additional compound. For compounds not amenable to GC-MS, such as highly polar or thermally labile pesticides, alternative methods including LC-MS/MS should be considered.

FAQs

Q: What is the limit of determination for this method?
A: At least 0.05 micrograms per liter for most target compounds, validated over a range of 0.05 to 0.3 micrograms per liter in interlaboratory trials. Detection limits depend on compound, matrix, and instrument sensitivity.
Q: How long does the SPME extraction take?
A: Typical extraction times are 30 to 60 minutes depending on target compounds and fibre coating type. Equilibrium times vary with analyte polarity and volatility. Automated multi-fibre systems can increase throughput.
Q: What fibre coating is recommended?
A: The standard specifies 100 micrometer polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) for non-polar compounds or 65 micrometer PDMS/divinylbenzene (DVB) for more polar analytes. Fibre selection depends on target compound polarity range.
Q: Can this method be used for wastewater analysis?
A: The scope covers drinking water, groundwater, and surface water. Wastewater application requires additional validation due to higher matrix complexity and potential for interferences.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *