ISO 26082-2:2012 – Leather Soiling Resistance: Tumbling Method

Understanding the Tumbling Method for Determining Visible Soiling Resistance of Leather Using Rotating Cylinders

Introduction to ISO 26082-2 and the Tumbling Soiling Method

ISO 26082-2:2012 (IULTCS/IUP 53-2) specifies a tumbling method for determining the resistance of all forms of leather to visible soiling through repeated impact with soiled felt pads. This method complements the Martindale rubbing approach covered in Part 1, providing an alternative mechanical action that better simulates certain real-world soiling scenarios such as abrasion against contaminated surfaces in a random, impact-dominated manner. Published as a first edition in 2012, this standard was developed by the Physical Tests Commission of IULTCS in collaboration with CEN/TC 289. It addresses the need for a more aggressive soiling test method for leathers used in demanding environments such as industrial footwear, work gloves, and heavy-duty upholstery.

The tumbling method is particularly well-suited for testing leather intended for footwear soles, work gloves, and industrial applications where impact-based soiling dominates over rubbing contact. Consider using both ISO 26082-1 and ISO 26082-2 to obtain a comprehensive soiling resistance profile for your material.

Apparatus and Reagent Specifications

The key distinction of the tumbling method lies in its specialized rotating cylinder apparatus and the synthetic sebum soiling composition. The tumbling machine operates at 24 +/- 2 r/min with automatic direction reversal every 10 minutes to ensure uniform soiling distribution across the specimen surface. At least four cylinders are required for simultaneous testing, each with internal dimensions of 300 mm length and 100 mm diameter. The cylinders are equipped with removable lids at both ends and annular specimen retaining collars with internal diameters of not less than 75 mm.

Parameter Specification Notes
Cylinder internal length 300 mm +/- 10 mm Minimum 4 cylinders required
Cylinder internal diameter 100 mm +/- 5 mm Each with removable lids
Rotation speed 24 r/min +/- 2 r/min Direction reversed at 10-min intervals
Specimen retaining collar Internal diameter 75 mm min Located at both cylinder ends
Synthetic sebum 18% fatty acids, 32.8% tallow, 3.6% triglycerides, 18.3% lanoline, 3.7% cholesterol, 12% hydrocarbons, 11.6% stearate Mass fractions
Colloidal graphite 18% +/- 0.5% in water-based dispersion Must be miscible with sebum
Synthetic sebum preparation requires precise mass fraction control of all components. The colloidal graphite must be thoroughly dispersed and fully miscible with the sebum solution before application to felt pads. Inadequate mixing leads to non-uniform soiling and poor test reproducibility between laboratories.

Test Procedure and End-Point Determination

The specimen is fixed at one end of the rotating cylinder while a standard fabric is fixed at the opposite end. Soiled felt pads measuring 30 mm x 30 mm x 15 mm are preconditioned with the synthetic sebum and colloidal graphite mixture for a minimum of 2 hours at 20 degrees C to ensure uniform penetration. As the cylinder rotates, the felt pads repeatedly impact both surfaces. The change in colour of the standard fabric serves as the end-point determinant for the soiling treatment, providing an objective measure of when sufficient contamination has been transferred.

Evaluation follows the same grey scale methodology as Part 1, using ISO 105-A02 for colour change assessment and ISO 105-A03/A04 for staining evaluation. The optional pretreatment procedure for simulating wear before soiling is also retained, allowing engineers to assess the durability of soiling resistance under realistic service conditions. End-point determination is critical because over-soiling can saturate the leather surface, masking differences between materials with genuinely different soiling resistance.

Engineering Design Insights for Test Optimization

From a test engineering perspective, several factors critically influence repeatability and reproducibility. The felt pad preconditioning time must be strictly controlled as incomplete penetration of the sebum mixture results in non-uniform soiling. The cylinder fill ratio directly affects the impact energy transferred to the specimen surface, and the number of tumbling cycles must be optimized for each leather type to reach the ideal soiling level without saturation. For quality control applications, including a reference leather of known soiling resistance in each test run enables normalization of batch-to-batch variability and improves comparability of results across different testing sessions.

The tumbling method key advantage over the Martindale method is the ability to test larger specimen areas and simulate three-dimensional soiling patterns. This makes it particularly valuable for testing leathers with textured surfaces or three-dimensional formed components where flat rubbing cannot adequately represent real-world exposure conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: What is the difference between the tumbling method and the Martindale rubbing method?
A: The tumbling method uses repeated impact from falling felt pads rather than rubbing contact, creating a different soiling mechanism that better simulates random impacts with contaminated surfaces.
Q2: How is the synthetic sebum prepared?
A: It is a formulated mixture of fatty acids, beef tallow, triglycerides, lanoline, cholesterol, hydrocarbons, and stearate at specified mass fractions plus colloidal graphite.
Q3: What determines the end-point of the soiling treatment?
A: The colour change of a standard fabric fixed at the opposite cylinder end provides an objective measure of sufficient soiling.
Q4: Can this method be used for automotive interior leathers?
A: Yes, particularly for lower interior regions where impact-based soiling from footwear and objects is more common than rubbing contact.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *