Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
IEC TS 63001 provides comprehensive guidelines for in-vehicle communication systems in road vehicles, covering architecture, protocol selection, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), network security, and data integrity requirements. As modern vehicles transition from isolated electronic control units (ECUs) to highly interconnected domains — powertrain, chassis, body, infotainment, and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) — the need for standardized communication guidelines has become critical for safety, reliability, and interoperability.
The document addresses both traditional in-vehicle networks (CAN, LIN, FlexRay, MOST) and emerging Ethernet-based architectures (100BASE-T1, 1000BASE-T1). It provides specific guidance on network topology design, message scheduling, error detection, fault containment, and timing synchronization across heterogeneous networks. Special attention is given to the gateway design between legacy and modern network segments.
| Protocol | Data Rate | Typical Application | Key Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAN (Classical) | 500 kbps – 1 Mbps | Powertrain, chassis, diagnostics | Mature ecosystem, deterministic arbitration |
| CAN FD | Up to 8 Mbps | Software update, high-bandwidth sensors | Larger payload, higher throughput |
| LIN | 20 kbps | Door modules, seat controls, lighting | Low cost, single-wire implementation |
| FlexRay | 10 Mbps | X-by-wire, safety-critical systems | Time-triggered deterministic behavior |
| 100BASE-T1 | 100 Mbps | ADAS, infotainment, backbone | Single twisted pair, IP compatibility |
| 1000BASE-T1 | 1 Gbps | Camera video streaming, radar data fusion | High bandwidth, low latency |
IEC TS 63001 advocates for a domain-based or zonal architecture approach. In domain architecture, ECUs are grouped by function (e.g., all powertrain-related controllers share a domain controller). In zonal architecture — increasingly favored for software-defined vehicles — ECUs are grouped by physical location within the vehicle, with a zonal gateway handling data routing to centralized compute platforms. The standard provides quantitative guidance on bus loading limits (typically not exceeding 60% under worst-case conditions), message latency budgets (ranging from 1 ms for airbag triggers to 100 ms for infotainment), and redundancy requirements for safety-critical functions.
Functional safety per ISO 26262 imposes additional requirements on in-vehicle communication. The standard provides a mapping between ASIL (Automotive Safety Integrity Level) ratings and communication mechanism requirements. For ASIL D functions (highest integrity level), IEC TS 63001 recommends redundant communication paths, end-to-end data integrity protection (CRC + sequence counter + timeout supervision), and fault-tolerant time synchronization with accuracy better than 10 microseconds.
When implementing an in-vehicle network per IEC TS 63001 guidelines, engineers should pay particular attention to the physical layer design. Termination resistor values, stub length limitations, and grounding schemes directly impact signal integrity. For CAN networks, the standard recommends maximum stub lengths of 0.3 m at 1 Mbps, with proper termination at both ends of the bus. For 100BASE-T1 Ethernet, the standard emphasizes the importance of common-mode choke selection and EMC filter design to meet CISPR 25 radiated emissions limits. The use of unshielded twisted pair (UTP) for automotive Ethernet requires careful PCB layout to minimize mode conversion.
With the advent of connected and autonomous vehicles, cybersecurity has become a paramount concern for in-vehicle communication. IEC TS 63001 incorporates guidance aligned with ISO 21434 (Road vehicles — Cybersecurity engineering). The standard addresses secure boot, authenticated diagnostic messages, intrusion detection systems for in-vehicle networks, and secure over-the-air (OTA) update mechanisms. Specific recommendations include the use of message authentication codes (MACs) for critical CAN messages, hardware security modules (HSMs) within ECUs for key management, and network segmentation to isolate safety-critical domains from infotainment and telematics systems.