Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
IEC TS 62972: General Lighting — Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED) Panels and Modules
Performance requirements and test methods for OLED panels and modules used in general lighting applications
IEC TS 62972, published in July 2016 by IEC Technical Committee 34 (Lamps and Related Equipment), establishes performance requirements and test methods for organic light emitting diode (OLED) panels and modules intended for general lighting purposes. As OLED technology emerged from display applications into the general illumination market, this standard provided the first comprehensive framework for characterizing and qualifying OLED lighting products, addressing the unique performance characteristics that distinguish OLEDs from conventional LED-based solid-state lighting sources.
OLED lighting panels represent a fundamentally different lighting technology from traditional LEDs. While conventional LEDs are point sources that require secondary optics to distribute light, OLEDs are large-area, thin-film, diffuse light sources that emit uniform illumination across their entire surface. This inherent surface-emitting characteristic enables ultra-thin luminaire designs (as thin as 0.5-2 mm), glare-free illumination with typical luminance uniformity exceeding 85%, and unique form factors impossible with point-source LEDs. The standard covers panels and modules with a total surface area of at least 0.1 cm² and a correlated color temperature (CCT) range typically between 2200 K and 6500 K, encompassing warm white through daylight white color temperatures.
OLED lighting panels offer several distinctive advantages over conventional LED sources: Lambertian emission profile providing wide beam angles without secondary optics, color rendering index (CRI) values exceeding 90 Ra, ultra-slim profile enabling integration into architectural surfaces, and potentially lower blue-light hazard due to broader spectral emission. However, current limitations include lower luminous efficacy (typically 60-90 lm/W compared to 150+ lm/W for high-end LEDs) and higher cost per lumen.
Optical and Electrical Performance Requirements
IEC TS 62972 defines a comprehensive set of performance parameters that must be characterized for OLED lighting products. On the optical side, key parameters include total luminous flux, luminous efficacy (lm/W), correlated color temperature (CCT), color rendering index (CRI or Ra), chromaticity coordinates (u’, v’ per CIE 1976 UCS), and luminance uniformity across the emitting surface. The standard specifies measurement conditions, including ambient temperature of 25 deg C +/- 2 deg C, warm-up time to reach thermal equilibrium (typically 30-60 minutes for OLED panels due to their thin-film construction and distributed heat generation), and measurement geometry appropriate for Lambertian emitters.
Electrical parameters include forward voltage, operating current, power consumption, and the current density-voltage (J-V) characteristic curve. Unlike LEDs that typically operate at 2-4 V per junction, OLED panels require higher operating voltages due to their multi-layer thin-film stack design, typically ranging from 5 V to 30 V depending on the number of stacked emitting units and the panel design. The standard requires manufacturers to specify the recommended operating current density (mA/cm²), which directly affects both luminance output and operational lifetime. Most commercial OLED lighting panels operate at current densities between 1-5 mA/cm² for optimal lifetime-efficacy tradeoff.
| Parameter | Symbol | Measurement Condition | Typical Values |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luminous efficacy | ηL | At rated current, 25 deg C, after warm-up | 60 – 90 lm/W |
| Color rendering index | Ra (CRI) | At rated operating point | 85 – 95 Ra |
| Correlated color temperature | CCT | At rated operating point | 2200 K – 6500 K |
| Operating voltage | Vf | At rated current, thermal equilibrium | 5 – 30 V |
| Luminance uniformity | UL | Min/average across emitting area | >= 85% |
| Color uniformity | Δu’v’ | Across panel surface | <= 0.004 |
| Lifetime (L70) | L70 | At rated current, 25 deg C constant | 15,000 – 50,000 h |
OLED photometric measurement requires careful attention to thermal management. Unlike LEDs where the junction temperature can be measured through the forward voltage drop, OLED panels have distributed heat generation across the entire emitting area. The standard requires measurement only after complete thermal stabilization, which can take 30 minutes or more for large-area panels. Improper thermal management during testing can result in luminance measurement errors of 10-20%.
Lifetime Testing and Color Stability
Lifetime characterization is one of the most critical aspects of OLED lighting qualification, and IEC TS 62972 addresses this through standardized test protocols. OLED panels exhibit gradual luminance decay over time, primarily due to degradation of the organic emitting layers and charge transport materials. The standard defines lifetime as the time to a specified percentage of initial luminance: L70 (70% of initial luminance) is the primary lifetime metric, though L80 and L90 may also be reported. Unlike LED lifetime prediction using the TM-21 methodology based on junction temperature acceleration, OLED lifetime testing is conducted at constant current and temperature conditions without accelerated thermal stress, as elevated temperatures can fundamentally alter the degradation mechanisms of organic materials.
Color stability over lifetime is another critical parameter addressed by the standard. OLED emission spectra can shift during operation due to differential aging of the organic emitting layers. The standard requires measurement of chromaticity shift (Δu’v’) at regular intervals throughout the lifetime test, with a typical acceptance criterion of Δu’v’ < 0.004 at L70 for general lighting applications. For high-quality OLED panels, the spectral shift is primarily caused by the differential degradation rates of the various emissive materials in the multi-layer stack, particularly in white OLED designs that combine blue, green, and red emitting layers. The standard also addresses the color shift that can occur with viewing angle changes, requiring measurement at multiple angles (0 deg, 30 deg, 45 deg, and 60 deg from normal) due to microcavity effects inherent in thin-film OLED structures.
| Lifetime Class | L70 (hours) | Test Duration | Typical Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class A | >= 40,000 | >= 6,000 h (extrapolated) | Architectural, commercial |
| Class B | >= 25,000 | >= 4,000 h (extrapolated) | General indoor lighting |
| Class C | >= 15,000 | >= 3,000 h (extrapolated) | Decorative, short-life |
| Special | As specified | Per agreement | Automotive, specialty |
Recent advances in OLED materials have dramatically improved lifetimes. While early OLED lighting panels (circa 2010-2014) had L70 lifetimes of only 5,000-10,000 hours, modern commercial OLED panels typically achieve 30,000-50,000 hours L70 at standard operating conditions. Thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) and phosphorescent OLED emitter systems have been key enablers of this improvement, achieving external quantum efficiencies exceeding 30%.
Mechanical and Environmental Requirements
IEC TS 62972 also addresses mechanical and environmental performance aspects unique to OLED lighting panels. Due to their extreme sensitivity to moisture and oxygen, OLED panels require hermetic encapsulation – typically achieved through glass frit sealing, thin-film encapsulation (TFE) layers, or edge seal adhesives. The standard requires manufacturers to specify the encapsulation method and to verify barrier performance through accelerated environmental testing including damp heat (85 deg C / 85% RH), thermal cycling (-40 deg C to +85 deg C), and UV exposure tests designed to simulate years of real-world environmental stress.
Mechanical robustness is tested through vibration, shock, and flexural tests appropriate for the intended application. For OLED panels used in luminaires, the glass substrate thickness (typically 0.5-1.1 mm) and the encapsulation seal width are critical design parameters that affect both optical quality and mechanical reliability. The standard specifies minimum bending radius requirements for flexible OLED panels, which represent an emerging product category with unique application possibilities in curved architectural surfaces and wearable lighting.
Moisture ingress is the single most critical failure mechanism for OLED lighting panels. Even microscopic pinholes in the encapsulation layers can lead to the formation of dark spots – non-emissive areas that grow over time as moisture reacts with the organic layers. The IEC TS 62972 damp heat test (85 deg C / 85% RH for 1,000 hours) is designed to accelerate this failure mechanism, and panels that develop dark spots larger than 0.1 mm during this test are considered failures.
Engineering Design Insights for OLED Lighting Systems
From a system design perspective, OLED lighting presents unique engineering challenges compared to conventional LED technology. The low operating voltage and current density requirements of OLED panels necessitate specialized driver circuits. OLED drivers must provide stable DC current with low ripple (typically < 5% ripple factor) and precise current control, as current variations directly affect both color temperature and luminance. Unlike LED drivers that can use pulse-width modulation (PWM) for dimming, OLED panels are typically dimmed through analog current control to avoid the high-frequency voltage transients that can damage the organic thin-film layers. Some advanced OLED drivers incorporate AC drive schemes with alternating polarity to redistribute ionic charge within the organic layers, potentially extending operational lifetime by reducing charge accumulation effects.
Thermal management of OLED systems requires a fundamentally different approach from LED systems. Rather than concentrating heat at a small junction, OLED panels distribute thermal dissipation across their entire surface area. While this reduces the peak thermal flux density, it also means the entire panel acts as a heat sink. Most OLED luminaire designs incorporate the panel substrate into the thermal path, using aluminum or copper heat spreaders bonded to the back of the panel to maintain operating temperature below 60-70 deg C, where accelerated degradation becomes significant. For proper thermal design, the system must achieve a thermal resistance from OLED stack to ambient of less than 2 K/W for typical 100 mm x 100 mm panels operating at 1-2 W/cm² thermal load density.
Optical design with OLEDs is simplified compared to LED systems due to the inherently Lambertian emission distribution. However, outcoupling enhancement remains a critical area for efficacy improvement. Standard OLED panels trap approximately 60-70% of generated light within the device structure due to total internal reflection at the glass-air interface, plasmonic losses at the metal cathode, and waveguide modes in the organic/ITO layers. Advanced outcoupling structures including internal scattering layers, microlens arrays, external extraction films, and photonic crystal structures can improve light extraction efficiency from approximately 20-30% to over 50%, representing the most significant opportunity for efficacy improvement in OLED lighting technology.
Q1: How does OLED lighting efficacy compare to LED lighting?
A: Current commercial OLED panels achieve 60-90 lm/W, compared to 130-200 lm/W for high-end LED systems. However, OLEDs offer inherent advantages in glare-free illumination (Lambertian emission), color quality (CRI > 90), ultra-slim form factors (< 2 mm), and design flexibility that make them attractive for premium architectural applications where quality of light matters more than raw efficacy.
A: Current commercial OLED panels achieve 60-90 lm/W, compared to 130-200 lm/W for high-end LED systems. However, OLEDs offer inherent advantages in glare-free illumination (Lambertian emission), color quality (CRI > 90), ultra-slim form factors (< 2 mm), and design flexibility that make them attractive for premium architectural applications where quality of light matters more than raw efficacy.
Q2: What is the typical lifetime of an OLED lighting panel?
A: Modern OLED panels typically achieve L70 lifetimes of 30,000-50,000 hours at standard operating conditions. This is comparable to many LED lighting products but generally less than the 50,000-100,000 hours achievable with high-quality LED systems. Lifetime is strongly dependent on operating current density and temperature; reducing drive current by 20% can approximately double the L70 lifetime.
A: Modern OLED panels typically achieve L70 lifetimes of 30,000-50,000 hours at standard operating conditions. This is comparable to many LED lighting products but generally less than the 50,000-100,000 hours achievable with high-quality LED systems. Lifetime is strongly dependent on operating current density and temperature; reducing drive current by 20% can approximately double the L70 lifetime.
Q3: Can OLED panels be dimmed and controlled like LEDs?
A: Yes, OLED panels can be dimmed, but typically through analog current control rather than PWM dimming. Most commercial OLED drivers support 0-10 V or DALI dimming protocols with a 10-100% dimming range. Color-tunable OLED panels combining warm white and cool white segments are also available, enabling CCT adjustment from 2700 K to 5000 K.
A: Yes, OLED panels can be dimmed, but typically through analog current control rather than PWM dimming. Most commercial OLED drivers support 0-10 V or DALI dimming protocols with a 10-100% dimming range. Color-tunable OLED panels combining warm white and cool white segments are also available, enabling CCT adjustment from 2700 K to 5000 K.
Q4: What are the main barriers to widespread OLED lighting adoption?
A: The three primary barriers are cost (currently 2-5x higher per lumen than LED), lower efficacy (60-90 lm/W vs 130-200 lm/W for LEDs), and limited availability of large-area panels (> 200 mm diagonal). Significant research investments in manufacturing scale-up, outcoupling enhancement, and solution-processable materials are expected to address these barriers over the next 5-10 years.
A: The three primary barriers are cost (currently 2-5x higher per lumen than LED), lower efficacy (60-90 lm/W vs 130-200 lm/W for LEDs), and limited availability of large-area panels (> 200 mm diagonal). Significant research investments in manufacturing scale-up, outcoupling enhancement, and solution-processable materials are expected to address these barriers over the next 5-10 years.
