Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
IEC TS 62727:2012 โ Specification for Solar Trackers for Photovoltaic Applications
💡 Key Insight: IEC TS 62727 is the first international specification dedicated to solar trackers for photovoltaic applications, providing a standardized taxonomy, accuracy characterization methodology, and reliability testing framework. With tracking systems capable of increasing energy yield by 15-40% compared to fixed-tilt installations, this standard is essential for utility-scale PV plant designers and investors.
1. Scope and Taxonomy of Solar Trackers
IEC TS 62727:2012, prepared by TC 82 (Solar photovoltaic energy systems), provides a comprehensive specification framework for solar trackers used in both standard photovoltaic (PV) and concentrating photovoltaic (CPV) applications. The standard covers trackers that automatically orient PV modules or CPV assemblies toward the sun to maximize energy capture throughout the day.
The standard establishes a detailed taxonomy that classifies trackers by several key characteristics:
| Classification Axis | Categories | Key Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| Payload type | Standard PV module trackers, CPV module trackers | Module mounting area, weight capacity, wind load rating |
| Rotational axes | Single axis (horizontal, vertical, tilted), Dual axis | Axis orientation, rotation range, tracking angle limits |
| Actuation and control | Centralized vs. distributed architecture, drive types | Motor type, gear ratio, power consumption |
| Control method | Passive control, Active control (open-loop, closed-loop), Hybrid | Sensor type, algorithm, backtracking capability |
| Structural configuration | Vertical support type, foundation type | Number of supports, pile vs. ballasted foundation |
2. Tracker Accuracy Characterization — Pointing Error
One of the most technically significant contributions of IEC TS 62727 is the detailed methodology for characterizing tracker accuracy through pointing error measurement. The pointing error is defined as the angular deviation between the actual orientation of the tracker and the ideal orientation that would maximize energy capture. This parameter directly affects energy yield — a 1° pointing error for standard PV modules typically results in less than 0.5% energy loss, but for CPV systems with 500× concentration, the same error can result in 10-20% power loss or complete loss of focus.
The measurement procedure (Clause 5.3) uses an experimental method involving two parallel plates with a pinhole, allowing the sun’s image to be projected onto a marked target. The accuracy is calculated from the distribution of pointing errors over a defined test period, with data binning by wind speed to account for the effect of wind-induced structural deflection.
✅ Engineering Insight: The wind speed binning requirement is critical — a tracker that achieves ±0.1° accuracy in calm conditions might degrade to ±1.0° in 15 m/s winds. The standard requires that tracking accuracy be reported as a function of wind speed, enabling plant designers to assess the energy impact of wind-induced tracking errors throughout the year. For CPV plants in windy locations, this data is essential for realistic energy yield predictions.
3. Structural and Mechanical Characterization
Clause 6 addresses the mechanical characterization of trackers, focusing on two parameters that directly affect long-term reliability: backlash and stiffness. Backlash in the drive train causes hysteresis in the tracking position — when the tracker reverses direction, there is a dead zone where the motor turns but the tracker does not move. This effect is particularly important for backtracking strategies where the tracker must reverse direction to avoid row-to-row shading during morning and evening hours.
Stiffness testing evaluates the structural deflection under static loads, including self-weight, module weight, and wind loads. The standard requires measurement of deflection at critical points under specified loading conditions, providing data that validates structural design models and ensures that tracking accuracy requirements can be maintained under operational wind loads.
⚠️ Design Consideration: The standard’s requirements for stow position and survival wind speed (Clause 4.12.4) are critical for plant safety. When wind speeds exceed the operational limit, the tracker must move to a stow position (typically horizontal or at a specified protective angle) to minimize wind loading. The stow time — how quickly the tracker can reach the stow position — is a key specification. For large utility-scale plants, the stow drive must be capable of operating on backup power to ensure safe stowing even during grid outages caused by the same storm event.
4. Reliability Testing and Environmental Durability
Clause 7 specifies reliability testing requirements including corrosion testing (salt spray for coastal installations), component durability testing (accelerated life testing of drives, bearings, and sensors), and extreme conditions testing (high temperature, low temperature, and thermal cycling). These tests are essential because solar trackers are exposed to continuous outdoor operation for 25-30 years with minimal maintenance access, particularly in remote desert locations where many large PV plants are sited.
The standard also introduces reliability terminology specific to trackers, including Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), Mean Time Between Critical Failures (MTBCF — where a critical failure causes complete loss of tracking function), and Mean Time To Repair (MTTR). These metrics enable plant operators to calculate availability and plan maintenance strategies.
💡 Practical Recommendation: When specifying trackers for a PV plant, request the tracker accuracy reported as a function of wind speed (per Clause 5.4.3), not just a single accuracy value. This is particularly important for single-axis trackers, which have different wind response characteristics than dual-axis trackers. A tracker that maintains ±2° accuracy in 10 m/s winds may provide higher annual energy yield than one that claims ±1° accuracy but only under laboratory conditions.
5. Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What is the typical energy gain from using single-axis vs. dual-axis trackers?
Single-axis (horizontal) trackers typically provide 15-25% energy gain over fixed-tilt systems at mid-latitudes. Dual-axis trackers can provide 25-40% gain but are primarily used for CPV systems and at high latitudes where seasonal solar altitude variation is significant. The choice depends on the specific project economics, land availability, and local electricity prices.
Single-axis (horizontal) trackers typically provide 15-25% energy gain over fixed-tilt systems at mid-latitudes. Dual-axis trackers can provide 25-40% gain but are primarily used for CPV systems and at high latitudes where seasonal solar altitude variation is significant. The choice depends on the specific project economics, land availability, and local electricity prices.
Q2: What is backtracking and when is it used?
Backtracking is a control strategy where the tracker deliberately moves away from the ideal sun-tracking angle to prevent row-to-row shading. It is used in dense array configurations where trackers are spaced closely to maximize land utilization. During morning and evening hours, the tracker rotates beyond the direct sun angle to align the module surface parallel to the inter-row spacing direction, eliminating shading losses at the cost of slightly reduced irradiance collection.
Backtracking is a control strategy where the tracker deliberately moves away from the ideal sun-tracking angle to prevent row-to-row shading. It is used in dense array configurations where trackers are spaced closely to maximize land utilization. During morning and evening hours, the tracker rotates beyond the direct sun angle to align the module surface parallel to the inter-row spacing direction, eliminating shading losses at the cost of slightly reduced irradiance collection.
Q3: How does the standard address tracker self-consumption?
Clause 4.7 requires specification of daily energy consumption and stow energy consumption. Tracker drive motors consume electricity, and for large plants with thousands of trackers, this parasitic load can be significant (typically 0.5-2% of plant generation). The standard requires that energy consumption be declared under standardized operating scenarios for fair comparison between tracker products.
Clause 4.7 requires specification of daily energy consumption and stow energy consumption. Tracker drive motors consume electricity, and for large plants with thousands of trackers, this parasitic load can be significant (typically 0.5-2% of plant generation). The standard requires that energy consumption be declared under standardized operating scenarios for fair comparison between tracker products.
Q4: Is the standard applicable to trackers for concentrated solar power (CSP) applications?
No, IEC TS 62727 specifically covers photovoltaic applications only. CSP trackers (heliostats for solar thermal power plants) have different accuracy requirements, payload characteristics, and operational regimes. Separate standards under IEC TC 117 (Solar thermal power plants) cover CSP tracking systems.
No, IEC TS 62727 specifically covers photovoltaic applications only. CSP trackers (heliostats for solar thermal power plants) have different accuracy requirements, payload characteristics, and operational regimes. Separate standards under IEC TC 117 (Solar thermal power plants) cover CSP tracking systems.
