Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
IEC TS 62398-2004: Fieldbus Specifications for Industrial Communication Networks
IEC TS 62398-2004 serves as a comprehensive overview and guidance document for the IEC 61158 and IEC 61784 series of fieldbus standards. As industrial automation evolved from centralized control architectures to distributed, networked systems, the need for standardized communication protocols became paramount. This Technical Specification provides the roadmap for engineers navigating the complex landscape of industrial fieldbus technologies, explaining the relationships between the various protocol families, their application profiles, and the selection criteria for specific use cases.
Design Insight: The fieldbus landscape has historically been fragmented, with multiple competing protocols. IEC TS 62398 clarifies that no single fieldbus is optimal for all applications. Instead, the standard family provides a toolkit approach, allowing engineers to select the most appropriate protocol based on determinism requirements, data rate, cable length, and device compatibility.
🎯 Understanding the IEC 61158 and IEC 61784 Framework
The IEC 61158 series, known as “Industrial communication networks – Fieldbus specifications,” defines the communication protocol layers (Physical, Data Link, and Application layers) for multiple fieldbus types. Rather than prescribing a single protocol, IEC 61158 encompasses multiple “types,” each corresponding to a major fieldbus technology on the market.
IEC 61784 complements this by defining “Communication Profile Families” (CPFs) that bundle together the necessary protocol layers from IEC 61158 with additional application profiles, installation guidelines, and conformance test requirements. The relationship can be summarized as follows:
- IEC 61158 Types 1-20+: Individual communication protocol specifications (e.g., Type 1 = Foundation Fieldbus, Type 3 = Profibus, Type 10 = EtherNet/IP).
- IEC 61784 CPFs 1-16+: Communication Profile Families that assemble the types into coherent, deployable industrial communication solutions.
- Conformance Testing: IEC 61784-2 defines test procedures to ensure interoperability between devices from different manufacturers.
Common Engineering Pitfall: Many engineers mistakenly assume that all fieldbus protocols offer equivalent real-time performance. In reality, each IEC 61158 type has fundamentally different medium access control mechanisms — from centralized token-passing (Profibus) to scheduled TDMA (Foundation Fieldbus HSE) to CSMA/CD (EtherNet/IP). The choice directly impacts determinism and jitter performance.
📊 Selecting the Right Fieldbus Profile for Your Application
IEC TS 62398 provides practical guidance for fieldbus selection based on application requirements. The following table compares the most widely deployed fieldbus profiles:
| Profile Family | IEC 61158 Type | Physical Layer | Max Data Rate | Typical Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foundation Fieldbus H1 | Type 1 | Twisted pair, 31.25 kbit/s | 31.25 kbit/s | Process control (continuous) |
| Profibus PA | Type 3 | Twisted pair, MBP | 31.25 kbit/s | Process automation, hazardous areas |
| Profibus DP | Type 3 | RS-485 twisted pair | 12 Mbit/s | Factory automation, discrete control |
| EtherNet/IP | Type 10 | 100BASE-TX Ethernet | 100 Mbit/s | Hybrid factory/process, high speed |
| PROFINET IO | Type 10 | 100BASE-TX Ethernet | 100 Mbit/s | Motion control, isochronous applications |
| Modbus TCP | Type 14 | 100BASE-TX Ethernet | 100 Mbit/s | Simple device integration, legacy systems |
| WorldFIP | Type 7 | Twisted pair, Manchester | 1 Mbit/s / 2.5 Mbit/s | Critical control, power generation |
| CC-Link IE | Type 18 | Gigabit Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | High-speed factory automation |
Proven Approach: For greenfield installations, a top-down selection process is recommended: (1) define the required cycle time and jitter tolerance, (2) assess power availability and cable routing constraints, (3) evaluate device ecosystem availability, and (4) consider long-term maintenance and support capabilities. Ethernet-based profiles (PROFINET, EtherNet/IP) are increasingly preferred for new installations due to higher bandwidth and IT/OT convergence.
🔧 Engineering Insights on Industrial Network Architecture
Implementing fieldbus networks at scale requires careful architectural planning. Here are key engineering considerations drawn from the IEC TS 62398 framework:
1. Determinism and Real-Time Performance
Not all industrial applications require hard real-time communication. Continuous process control (e.g., temperature, pressure loops) typically tolerates cycle times of 100-1000 ms, while motion control and high-speed discrete manufacturing may demand cycle times below 1 ms with jitter under 1 microsecond. The fieldbus selection must match these performance requirements. For hard real-time applications, PROFINET IRT (Isochronous Real-Time) or EtherCAT (IEC 61158 Type 12) are preferred.
2. Cabling and Topology
Physical layer selection has profound implications for installation cost and reliability. Twisted-pair MBP (Manchester Bus Powered) used by Foundation Fieldbus H1 and Profibus PA allows devices to be powered directly from the bus, eliminating the need for local power supplies in hazardous areas. Ethernet-based solutions require structured cabling (Cat5e/Cat6) but offer higher data rates and easier integration with enterprise networks.
3. Device Integration and Interoperability
The IEC 61784 profile definitions include standardized device descriptions (e.g., EDDL, FDT/DTM, FDI) that enable multi-vendor interoperability. Engineers should verify that all devices on a planned network segment support the same profile version and device description technology to avoid integration issues during commissioning.
4. Network Segmentation and Security
As industrial networks converge with IT infrastructure, security becomes critical. IEC TS 62398 provides guidance on network segmentation using bridges and routers to isolate control traffic from enterprise traffic. Modern implementations add firewalls, VPNs, and intrusion detection systems per IEC 62443 (industrial network security).
Critical Integration Risk: Mixing fieldbus protocols on the same physical segment is not permitted — each IEC 61158 type uses different signaling schemes, and connecting incompatible devices can damage transceivers. Gateways must be used for inter-protocol communication, and gateway latency must be budgeted into overall system response time.
❔ Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What is the difference between IEC 61158 and IEC 61784?
IEC 61158 defines the communication protocol layers (OSI layers 1, 2, and 7) for each fieldbus type. IEC 61784 defines Communication Profile Families (CPFs) that assemble protocol layers from IEC 61158, add application profiles, installation guidelines, and conformance testing requirements. Think of IEC 61158 as the “protocol engine” and IEC 61784 as the “complete vehicle” ready for deployment.
Q2: Can I connect devices from different fieldbus types on the same network?
No, not directly. Devices using different IEC 61158 types cannot communicate on the same physical segment because they use different signaling, framing, and media access control methods. Interconnection requires a gateway or proxy device that translates between protocols. When designing multi-vendor systems, ensure all devices on a given segment support the same fieldbus type.
Q3: Is wireless communication covered by the IEC 61158/61784 series?
The original IEC TS 62398 focused on wired fieldbus networks. However, IEC 61784 now includes wireless profiles (WIA-PA, WirelessHART, ISA100.11a) in later editions. For wireless industrial communication, refer specifically to IEC 61784-3 (wireless profiles) and the corresponding radio-specific standards.
Q4: How do I determine which fieldbus profile is best for my application?
Consider three primary factors: (1) Performance requirements — cycle time, jitter tolerance, and data payload size; (2) Environmental constraints — cable length, hazardous area classification, and power availability; (3) Ecosystem maturity — device availability, engineering tool support, and regional preference. A process plant in the chemical industry may favor Foundation Fieldbus or Profibus PA, while an automotive manufacturing line may prefer PROFINET or EtherNet/IP.
