Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
IEC TS 61370:2002 addresses a fundamental engineering reality: steam in a thermal power cycle is never pure H₂O. Even with well-designed water treatment systems, steam carries trace amounts of contaminants that can cause severe damage over time. The specification quantifies acceptable contaminant levels and provides monitoring and control methodologies to protect turbine integrity.
The economic impact of poor steam purity is substantial. Corrosion-related forced outages in steam turbines account for 3-7% of total plant unavailability in fossil-fired plants and a higher percentage in nuclear units where wetness conditions are more severe. A single blade failure caused by stress corrosion cracking (SCC) can result in repair costs exceeding $2 million and outage durations of 4-8 weeks.
| Damage Mechanism | Primary Contaminant | Affected Components | Typical Onset Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) | Chloride (Cl⁻), Hydroxide (OH⁻) | LP disc keyways, blade roots, shrunk-on discs | 6-24 months at elevated levels |
| Corrosion fatigue (CF) | Oxygen (O₂), Carbon dioxide (CO₂) | LP blade trailing edges, last-stage blades | 12-36 months |
| Deposition / scaling | Silica (SiO₂), Sodium (Na), Iron (Fe) | HP and IP nozzle vanes, control stage blades | 3-12 months (rapid if silica exceeds limits) |
| Solid particle erosion (SPE) | Exfoliated magnetite (Fe₃O₄) | HP control stage, governing valves | 5-20 years (accelerated after startup cycles) |
| Pitting corrosion | Chloride (Cl⁻), Sulphate (SO₄²⁻) | LP blade surfaces, disc dovetails | 3-6 months in stagnant conditions |
IEC TS 61370 defines stringent limits for key contaminants in main steam, with the understanding that these limits apply at the turbine inlet. The specification recognises that different water chemistry treatment programmes (all-volatile treatment AVT, oxygenated treatment OT, phosphate treatment) produce different baseline chemistry conditions and therefore require different monitoring strategies.
| Parameter | Symbol | Target Value | Alert Level | Action Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cation conductivity | κ | ≤ 0.15 μS/cm | 0.2 μS/cm | 0.3 μS/cm |
| Sodium | Na | ≤ 2 μg/kg | 3 μg/kg | 5 μg/kg |
| Chloride | Cl⁻ | ≤ 2 μg/kg | 3 μg/kg | 5 μg/kg |
| Silica | SiO₂ | ≤ 10 μg/kg | 15 μg/kg | 20 μg/kg |
| Iron | Fe | ≤ 5 μg/kg | 10 μg/kg | 15 μg/kg |
| Copper | Cu | ≤ 2 μg/kg | 3 μg/kg | 5 μg/kg |
| Dissolved oxygen | O₂ | ≤ 10 μg/kg (AVT) / 30-150 μg/kg (OT) | N/A | Deviation from target band |
The specification recommends continuous on-line monitoring for cation conductivity, sodium, and silica at minimum, with periodic grab sampling for chloride, sulphate, iron, and copper. Sampling locations must be carefully selected to obtain representative samples — the standard provides specific guidance on isokinetic sampling probe design and placement for steam lines.
The specification provides an engineering framework for correlating steam chemistry with material degradation and selecting appropriate protection strategies. Three corrosion mechanisms receive particular attention:
The LP turbine rotor discs and blade attachments are the most SCC-susceptible components in a steam turbine. The combination of high tensile stress (from centrifugal loading and shrink-fit discs), the presence of corrosive contaminants (particularly chlorides and hydroxides), and the operating temperature range (80-180 °C in LP sections) creates ideal conditions for SCC initiation and propagation. Disc keyway cracking — typically occurring in the first few disc grooves of the LP rotor — has caused multiple catastrophic rotor failures worldwide.
IEC TS 61370 recommends the following strategies for SCC mitigation:
SPE results from exfoliation of magnetite (Fe₃O₄) from the inner surfaces of superheater tubes, main steam pipes, and reheat lines. These oxide particles become entrained in the steam flow and impact turbine vanes and blades at high velocity, causing metal loss and efficiency degradation. The specification notes that SPE is most severe in units that cycle frequently (daily start-stop), as thermal cycling accelerates oxide exfoliation.
Mitigation approaches include:
Effective steam purity control requires an integrated approach to cycle chemistry management. The specification outlines a complete control strategy:
| Control Point | Parameter | Sampling Frequency | Control Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Makeup water | Cation conductivity, TOC, Silica | Continuous | Reverse osmosis + mixed-bed ion exchange; EDI for new plants |
| Condensate | Cation conductivity, Sodium, Oxygen | Continuous | Condensate polishing (full-flow or sidestream); oxygen scavenger injection |
| Feedwater | pH, Iron, Copper, Oxygen | Continuous (pH, O₂) / Daily (Fe, Cu) | AVT (ammonia/amine) or OT (oxygen injection) pH control |
| Main steam | Cation conductivity, Sodium, Silica, Chloride | Continuous | Steam purity monitoring; blowdown if limits exceeded |
| Boiler water | pH, Phosphate, Silica, Conductivity | Continuous | Chemical dosing; blowdown for silica control |
The specification emphasises that grab sample results are only valid when sampling procedures are correctly performed. Isokinetic sampling is essential for particulate contaminants (iron, copper), as non-isokinetic sampling can under- or over-estimate particulate concentrations by factors of 2-5. The standard provides detailed sampling system design requirements, including probe tip geometry (sharply bevelled, facing upstream), sample line material (stainless steel 316L or better, never copper or carbon steel), and sample line flushing procedures.
IEC TS 61370 and VGB R 450 Le (now VGB-S-010-T-00) share similar limit values but differ in scope and structure. IEC TS 61370 is published as an IEC Technical Specification making it more directly quotable in international turbine supply contracts. VGB R 450 has more detailed operational procedures. The two documents are broadly compatible, and many turbine manufacturers reference both.
Supercritical (SC) and ultra-supercritical (USC) plants require even tighter steam purity than subcritical units because: (a) the higher temperatures and pressures accelerate corrosion kinetics, (b) the single-phase (no drum) design means all impurities pass directly through the turbine, and (c) deposition of even thin silica films causes proportionally larger efficiency losses at high pressures. For USC plants (> 600 °C, > 250 bar), target cation conductivity is 0.1 μS/cm and silica target is 5 μg/kg.
Yes, if the excursion is detected early and corrective action is taken within the time limits specified in IEC TS 61370. For minor excursions (alert level), controlled boiler blowdown and condensate polishing rate increase typically restore purity within 2-4 hours. For major excursions (action level), a controlled load reduction and possibly a turbine trip may be required. The critical factor is time at elevated contaminant levels — SCC initiation requires both a critical contaminant concentration AND sufficient time under stress.
The specification addresses fossil-fired steam turbines primarily. For nuclear steam turbines, additional considerations apply: (a) radiolysis effects in BWR steam increase oxygen and hydrogen peroxide levels, (b) wetness is higher (10-15% in LP for nuclear vs. 5-8% for fossil), and (c) strict control of cobalt-containing alloys is needed to minimise radiation fields. Nuclear steam purity limits for chloride and sodium are typically more stringent (≤ 1 μg/kg) due to the higher wetness and longer operating cycles.