Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The rapid proliferation of augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality (MR) devices has created a pressing need for standardized terminology to describe the performance and characteristics of eyewear displays. IEC TR 63145-1-1 addresses this need by establishing a comprehensive vocabulary and set of definitions for eyewear display technologies, covering optical parameters, image quality metrics, ergonomic considerations, and measurement methodologies.
Eyewear displays, also commonly referred to as head-mounted displays (HMDs), smart glasses, or near-eye displays, present unique measurement and characterization challenges compared to conventional flat-panel displays. The optical path involves multiple elements including waveguides, combiners, micro-displays, and projection optics, all of which must be precisely aligned and calibrated to deliver a satisfactory user experience. Without standardized terminology, comparing products from different manufacturers or evaluating technical improvements across generations becomes unreliable.
| Term | Abbreviation | Definition per IEC TR 63145-1-1 | Typical Measurement Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Field of View | FOV | Angular extent of the visible display content as seen by the user’s eye | Degrees (°) |
| Eye Relief | ER | Distance from the last optical surface to the user’s corneal apex | Millimeters (mm) |
| Exit Pupil | EP | Diameter of the beam of light exiting the eyepiece optics | Millimeters (mm) |
| Virtual Image Distance | VID | Apparent distance from the eye to the virtual image plane | Meters (m) or Diopters (D) |
| Luminance Uniformity | LU | Ratio of minimum to maximum luminance across the field of view | Percentage (%) |
| Modulation Transfer Function | MTF | Measure of optical system contrast preservation at a given spatial frequency | Line pairs per degree (lp/°) |
The scope of IEC TR 63145-1-1 extends beyond mere definitions. It provides a structured taxonomy that categorizes eyewear display parameters into optical, electro-optical, image quality, and ergonomic groups. This classification system enables engineers and researchers to systematically evaluate display performance and identify the root causes of visual quality degradation in prototype and production systems.
The standard defines a comprehensive set of optical parameters that characterize the performance of eyewear displays. Field of View (FOV) is one of the most important and most frequently cited specifications, yet its measurement can vary significantly depending on the methodology used. IEC TR 63145-1-1 specifies that FOV should be measured as the diagonal angular extent at the design eye position, with the display showing a full-white test pattern at maximum luminance. Both monocular and binocular FOV are defined, along with the overlap region which is critical for stereoscopic depth perception.
Resolution in eyewear displays is measured in terms of angular resolution (arc minutes per pixel or line pairs per degree) rather than the raw pixel count of the micro-display. This is because the same micro-display can produce very different angular resolutions depending on the optical magnification employed. The standard specifies measurement procedures using USAF 1951 resolution test charts or equivalent patterns, imaged through the complete optical system including the eyepiece and any waveguide combiner.
Luminance and contrast measurements for eyewear displays require specialized equipment and procedures due to the proximity of the display to the eye. The standard specifies the use of an imaging photometer or a spot photometer with a custom-designed artificial eye that replicates the optical characteristics of the human eye, including the pupil diameter (typically 4 mm for photopic conditions) and the spectral response of the human visual system. Colorimetry follows the CIE 1931 standard colorimetric system, with measurements reported in the sRGB or DCI-P3 color space as appropriate for the application.
Latency, or motion-to-photon delay, is a critical parameter for AR/VR applications where head movements must be tracked and rendered with minimal delay to prevent simulator sickness. IEC TR 63145-1-1 defines latency as the time difference between a change in the input (e.g., head rotation) and the corresponding change in the displayed image, measured using a high-speed photodetector and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) synchronized with sub-millisecond precision.
Implementing the measurement and characterization framework defined in IEC TR 63145-1-1 requires careful attention to test setup, environmental conditions, and statistical analysis. The standard emphasizes that all optical measurements should be performed in a darkroom environment (ambient illuminance < 1 lux) after a warm-up period of at least 30 minutes to allow the display and measurement instruments to reach thermal equilibrium.
One of the most challenging aspects of eyewear display testing is the alignment between the display under test and the measurement instrument. The standard specifies a six-degree-of-freedom alignment procedure using precision translation and rotation stages, with the display positioned at the design eye point. For binocular displays, the interpupillary distance (IPD) adjustment mechanism must be set to the nominal value used in the product specification, typically 63.5 mm representing the population average.
For see-through AR displays, the standard introduces specific metrics that are not applicable to immersive VR displays. These include see-through luminance (the perceived brightness of the real-world scene through the display), see-through color shift (change in chromaticity coordinates when viewing through the combiner), and occlusion capability (the ability to render virtual objects that optically block real-world objects behind them). Occlusion is particularly challenging and remains an active area of research; current waveguide-based combiners typically achieve only partial occlusion.
The standard also addresses subjective evaluation methods through defined visual comfort scales and task performance metrics. While objective measurements form the foundation of display characterization, the ultimate assessment of an eyewear display depends on human visual perception. The standard provides structured questionnaires (such as the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire SSQ and the NASA Task Load Index NASA-TLX) that should be administered as part of a comprehensive display evaluation protocol.