Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
IEC 62899-301-1: Printed Electronics and Inkjet Printing Equipment
Technical Standard for Inkjet Printing Equipment in Printed Electronics Manufacturing Based on IEC 62899-301-1:2017
IEC 62899-301-1:2017 is part of the IEC 62899 series addressing printed electronics, specifically focusing on inkjet printing equipment. Printed electronics represents a paradigm shift in manufacturing electronic devices, enabling additive, mask-less fabrication on flexible substrates at significantly reduced material waste compared to traditional photolithographic processes. This standard establishes terminology, classification, and performance evaluation methods for inkjet printing systems used in electronics fabrication.
Inkjet-printed electronics enables feature resolution down to 20–50 μm without masks, making it ideal for rapid prototyping of RFID antennas, sensors, and thin-film transistors on flexible substrates such as PET, PEN, and polyimide films.
1. Equipment Classification and Performance Metrics
The standard classifies inkjet printing equipment for printed electronics into three categories based on droplet generation mechanism: piezoelectric drop-on-demand (DoD), thermal DoD, and electrohydrodynamic (EHD) printing. Piezoelectric DoD systems dominate the electronics printing sector due to their compatibility with a wide range of functional inks, including conductive nanoparticle suspensions, semiconducting polymers, and dielectric formulations.
Critical performance metrics defined in IEC 62899-301-1 include droplet volume repeatability (coefficient of variation < 2%), droplet placement accuracy (< ±5 μm at 3σ), and jetting frequency stability. The standard specifies test methods for evaluating these parameters using high-speed imaging and automated optical inspection systems.
| Parameter | Requirement | Test Method | Impact on Print Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Droplet volume CV | < 2% | High-speed camera + image analysis | Line width uniformity |
| Placement accuracy | ±5 μm (3σ) | Printed pattern + optical measurement | Layer-to-layer registration |
| Jetting frequency | ≥ 10 kHz | Stroboscopic observation | Throughput |
| Ink viscosity range | 5 – 30 mPa·s | Rotational rheometry | Droplet formation stability |
| Nozzle plate lifetime | ≥ 109 drops/nozzle | Accelerated life test | Production reliability |
A common pitfall in printed electronics is inkjet nozzle clogging caused by solvent evaporation at the nozzle meniscus. Engineers should implement a printhead maintenance schedule including periodic purging, wiping, and spitting routines. The standard recommends a maximum idle time of 60 seconds between purge cycles for solvent-based nanoparticle inks.
2. Functional Ink Requirements and Substrate Interaction
The standard provides extensive guidance on ink formulation requirements for reliable jetting. Key parameters include viscosity (5–30 mPa·s at jetting temperature), surface tension (25–40 mN/m), and particle size (must be < 1/50 of nozzle diameter to prevent clogging). For silver nanoparticle inks commonly used for conductive traces, the standard specifies that particle agglomeration must be controlled to maintain a D90 particle size below 200 nm for 10 μm diameter nozzles.
Substrate selection is equally critical. The standard addresses surface energy requirements and pre-treatment methods including corona, plasma, and UV-ozone treatment to improve ink wettability and adhesion. A minimum surface energy of 40 mN/m is recommended for aqueous inks on polymer substrates.
Post-printing sintering is a critical step for achieving electrical conductivity in printed nanoparticle traces. Photonic sintering using intense pulsed light (IPL) can achieve conductivity exceeding 30% of bulk silver in under 2 milliseconds, compared to 30–60 minutes required for thermal oven sintering.
3. Engineering Insights for Production Integration
Moving from R&D to production-scale printed electronics requires careful attention to process stability. The standard recommends implementing real-time drop-watching systems with machine vision feedback for closed-loop jetting parameter adjustment. Temperature control of both the printhead and substrate is specified within ±0.5 °C to maintain consistent ink viscosity and droplet formation.
Registration accuracy across multiple print layers presents one of the greatest challenges. For multilayer printed circuits, the standard specifies that fiducial mark-based alignment should achieve ±10 μm overlay accuracy, with thermal expansion compensation required when processing on polymer substrates that exhibit 20–50 ppm/°C thermal expansion coefficients.
Environmental control requirements include Class 10,000 (ISO 7) cleanroom conditions, relative humidity maintained at 40–60%, and particulate filtration to < 0.3 μm to prevent defects from airborne contamination.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What is the minimum conductive line width achievable with inkjet printing for electronics?
Using optimized piezoelectric DoD printers with 1 pL droplet volume and suitable substrate treatment, consistent line widths of 20–30 μm can be achieved. Under laboratory conditions with advanced waveform shaping, line widths down to 10 μm have been demonstrated, though production reliability at this scale remains challenging.
Using optimized piezoelectric DoD printers with 1 pL droplet volume and suitable substrate treatment, consistent line widths of 20–30 μm can be achieved. Under laboratory conditions with advanced waveform shaping, line widths down to 10 μm have been demonstrated, though production reliability at this scale remains challenging.
Q2: How does inkjet-printed electronics compare to screen printing for large-area applications?
Inkjet printing offers greater design flexibility (no mask required), faster design iterations, and finer resolution (20–50 μm vs. 100–200 μm for screen printing). However, screen printing achieves higher throughput (>10 m/min) and thicker deposits (5–20 μm vs. 0.1–2 μm for inkjet). The choice depends on application requirements for resolution, conductivity, and production volume.
Inkjet printing offers greater design flexibility (no mask required), faster design iterations, and finer resolution (20–50 μm vs. 100–200 μm for screen printing). However, screen printing achieves higher throughput (>10 m/min) and thicker deposits (5–20 μm vs. 0.1–2 μm for inkjet). The choice depends on application requirements for resolution, conductivity, and production volume.
Q3: What sintering methods are recommended for heat-sensitive flexible substrates?
For substrates like PET (Tg ~70 °C) and PEN (Tg ~120 °C), photonic sintering (IPL) and electrical sintering are preferred. These methods achieve conductivity within milliseconds without damaging the substrate. Microwave sintering and chemical sintering at room temperature are emerging alternatives specified in the standard’s annex.
For substrates like PET (Tg ~70 °C) and PEN (Tg ~120 °C), photonic sintering (IPL) and electrical sintering are preferred. These methods achieve conductivity within milliseconds without damaging the substrate. Microwave sintering and chemical sintering at room temperature are emerging alternatives specified in the standard’s annex.
Q4: What are the key reliability tests for printed electronic devices according to IEC 62899?
The standard references IEC 60068 for environmental testing including temperature cycling (−40 °C to +85 °C, 500 cycles), damp heat (85 °C/85% RH, 1000 hours), and thermal shock. Additional tests specific to printed electronics include bending fatigue (>10,000 cycles at 5 mm radius), crease testing, and adhesion testing per ASTM D3359.
The standard references IEC 60068 for environmental testing including temperature cycling (−40 °C to +85 °C, 500 cycles), damp heat (85 °C/85% RH, 1000 hours), and thermal shock. Additional tests specific to printed electronics include bending fatigue (>10,000 cycles at 5 mm radius), crease testing, and adhesion testing per ASTM D3359.
