Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
IEC 62620-2014: Large Format Secondary Lithium Cells for Industrial Applications – Performance Testing
IEC 62620-2014 is the international benchmark for performance characterization of large format secondary lithium cells, defined as cells with a rated capacity greater than 20 Ah. The standard provides standardized test protocols for capacity, power, internal resistance, cycle life, and storage characteristics, enabling consistent comparison across different cell designs and manufacturers.
Scope and Cell Classification
IEC 62620 applies specifically to large format secondary lithium cells used in industrial applications. The standard defines large format as cells with a rated capacity exceeding 20 Ah, distinguishing them from portable device cells (covered by IEC 62133, typically < 20 Ah) and EV traction cells (covered by IEC 62660 series). The standard covers all common lithium chemistries including lithium iron phosphate (LFP), lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC), lithium titanate oxide (LTO), and lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide (NCA).
The performance parameters defined in this standard are essential for battery system designers who need to compare cells from different suppliers on a consistent basis. Without standardized test protocols, comparisons become unreliable due to variations in test temperatures, charge-discharge rates, voltage limits, and ambient conditions that significantly affect measured performance.
The 2014 edition of IEC 62620 was developed before the widespread adoption of LFP cells in stationary storage and NMC 811 high-nickel chemistries. Engineers should verify that the test conditions (voltage limits, temperature ranges) are appropriate for the specific chemistry being tested. Some newer chemistries may require extended voltage windows or modified test procedures that are not fully captured in this edition.
Capacity and Energy Characterization
Rated Capacity Verification
The rated capacity test is the foundational performance measurement. The cell is subjected to a full charge to the manufacturer’s specified upper voltage limit using the recommended constant current/constant voltage (CC/CV) protocol, followed by a controlled rest period (typically 1 hour at 25 °C), then discharged at a C/3 rate to the specified lower voltage limit. The measured capacity must equal or exceed the manufacturer’s rated capacity. This test is conducted at 25 °C ± 2 °C and also optionally at elevated (45 °C) and low (0 °C) temperatures to characterize temperature sensitivity.
| Characteristic | Test Condition | Measurement | Performance Indicator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rated Capacity | C/3, 25 °C | Ah (to Vmin) | ≥ Rated value |
| High-rate Capacity | 1C, 2C, 3C at 25 °C | Ah at each rate | Rate capability ratio |
| Low-temp Capacity | C/3 at 0 °C or -10 °C | % of 25 °C capacity | Low-temp performance |
| High-temp Capacity | C/3 at 45 °C | % of 25 °C capacity | High-temp stability |
| Energy Density | Calculated from mass/volume | Wh/kg, Wh/L | Energy density metric |
Rate Capability Assessment
Rate capability testing determines how well the cell maintains capacity at higher discharge currents. The test protocol involves charging the cell fully, then discharging at progressively higher rates (typically C/3, 1C, 2C, and 3C) with adequate rest between each test. The ratio of capacity at higher rates to capacity at the reference rate (C/3) provides the rate capability factor, which is critical for applications with high peak power demands. A high-quality industrial LFP cell typically achieves 92–96 % capacity retention at 1C and 85–90 % at 2C relative to C/3.
When interpreting rate capability data, engineers should pay close attention to the voltage cutoff conditions. Cells with higher internal resistance will reach the lower voltage limit earlier at high discharge rates, artificially reducing measured capacity. For accurate comparison, use a consistent cutoff voltage and note that some manufacturers use a lower cutoff for high-rate tests, which can inflate rate capability figures.
Power and Internal Resistance Measurement
IEC 62620 specifies both DC and AC methods for internal resistance measurement. The DC method uses a 10-second discharge pulse at 1C, measuring the instantaneous voltage drop (within 100 ms) to calculate ohmic resistance and the subsequent voltage decay to calculate polarization resistance. The AC method (typically at 1 kHz) provides a measurement of the ohmic component only, which is useful for quick quality screening during production but does not capture the full impedance relevant for power applications.
| Parameter | Method | Procedure | Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| DC Internal Resistance | HPPC pulse | 1C discharge 10 s, 1C regen 10 s | Power capability estimation |
| AC Impedance (1 kHz) | AC milliohm meter | 1 kHz, ≤ 10 mV RMS | Production quality control |
| Polarization Resistance | From DC pulse decay | ΔV after 10 s pulse | Electrode design assessment |
| Power Density | Calculated | P = V×I at 50 % SoC | System power sizing |
Cycle Life Testing Protocol
Cycle life testing under IEC 62620 is conducted at 25 °C with a 100 % depth of discharge (DoD) cycle profile. The standard specifies a C/2 charge rate and C/2 discharge rate with a 30-minute rest between charge and discharge. The test continues until the cell reaches 80 % of its initial rated capacity, which is defined as the end-of-life criterion. The result is reported as the number of cycles to end of life. For LFP cells, this typically ranges from 3,000 to 8,000 cycles depending on the specific cell design and quality. NMC cells typically achieve 2,000 to 4,000 cycles under these test conditions.
A critical nuance: cycle life testing at 100 % DoD with C/2 rates represents a moderate stress condition. Real-world applications often involve partial cycling (e.g., 20–80 % SoC for grid storage) or higher rates (1C+ for power applications), which significantly affect cycle life. Engineers must develop application-specific aging models rather than relying solely on the standard test result. As a rule of thumb, reducing the DoD from 100 % to 50 % can increase cycle life by a factor of 2–4, while operating at elevated temperatures (45 °C) can reduce cycle life by 40–60 %.
Engineering Design Insights
Test Fixture Design for Large Format Cells. Large format cells present unique challenges for testing. The high currents involved (100–300 A for a 100–200 Ah cell) require robust test fixtures with low-resistance connections. Kelvin sensing (4-wire measurement) is mandatory to separate current-carrying and voltage-sensing paths. Busbar connections should use at least M8 bolts with a torque of 15–20 Nm for prismatic cells. The cell must be mounted in a fixture that provides consistent contact pressure (typically 300–500 kPa for prismatic cells with aluminum housings) to simulate real module conditions and ensure reproducible test results.
Thermal Management During Testing. Performance data is meaningless if the cell temperature is not controlled. For large format cells, the heat generated during high-rate testing can easily exceed 50 W per cell, requiring active cooling to maintain 25 °C ± 2 °C. A test setup should include thermocouples at the cell terminal, the cell case center, and the ambient environment. The temperature rise during a 1C discharge should not exceed 5 °C for valid performance characterization. If the temperature rise is greater, the measured performance includes a thermal contribution that will not be reproducible under different thermal conditions.
Data Analysis and Reporting. IEC 62620 specifies minimum reporting requirements including test conditions, measured capacity at each rate, internal resistance values, cycle life data with capacity fade curve, and storage retention results. For engineering purposes, we recommend additionally reporting the differential capacity (dQ/dV) analysis, which reveals phase transitions in the electrode materials and can detect degradation mechanisms such as lithium inventory loss or active material degradation. The dQ/dV curves should be recorded at least every 100 cycles during cycle life testing.
When selecting cells for a specific application, create a weighted performance matrix that assigns importance factors to each performance parameter. For example, a grid storage application might weight cycle life at 40 %, round-trip efficiency at 25 %, energy density at 15 %, and cost at 20 %. This quantitative approach prevents subjective bias in cell selection and provides traceable justification for procurement decisions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What is the minimum number of samples required for IEC 62620 performance testing?
The standard recommends a minimum of 5 cells per test condition for capacity and rate capability tests. For cycle life testing, a minimum of 3 cells is recommended. Statistical analysis (mean and standard deviation) should be reported. For qualification programs, using 10 cells per condition provides more statistically significant results, especially for cycle life where cell-to-cell variation can be significant.
Q2: How does IEC 62620 differ from IEC 62660-1 for EV cells?
IEC 62620 focuses on industrial large format cells (> 20 Ah) with test conditions reflecting stationary and material handling applications. IEC 62660-1 targets EV traction cells and includes dynamic discharge profiles (e.g., simulated driving cycles), vibration testing during performance characterization, and different voltage and temperature ranges more representative of automotive environments.
Q3: Can IEC 62620 test results be used for battery system simulation and modeling?
Yes. The HPPC test data from IEC 62620 can be directly used to parameterize equivalent circuit models (ECMs) for system simulation. The 10-second pulse data at various SoC points provides the parameters for a 2-RC equivalent circuit model, which is sufficient for most system-level simulations of voltage response and power capability. For more detailed electrochemical modeling, additional tests such as electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and GITT are required.
Q4: Does IEC 62620 cover safety testing?
No. IEC 62620 is exclusively a performance standard. Safety testing for large format industrial cells is covered by IEC 62619 (which shares the same scope as IEC 62620 but focuses on safety rather than performance). The two standards are designed to be used together for comprehensive cell qualification.
