Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
IEC 62110:2009 — Electric and Magnetic Field Levels Generated by AC Power Systems — Measurement Procedures for Public Exposure
Standard Snapshot: IEC 62110 establishes standardized measurement procedures for determining electric and magnetic field (EMF) levels from AC power systems, including overhead transmission lines, underground cables, and substations, specifically addressing public exposure assessment.
1. Scope and Purpose
IEC 62110:2009 provides measurement procedures for electric and magnetic fields generated by AC power systems operating at power frequencies (50 Hz and 60 Hz). Its primary focus is on assessing exposure levels for the general public near power infrastructure. The standard covers measurement methods for overhead transmission lines of various voltage classes (from distribution to ultra-high voltage), underground power cables, and electrical substations.
The standard addresses the need for standardized and reproducible measurement procedures, recognizing that EMF levels depend on multiple factors including conductor configuration, phase arrangement, load current, distance from the source, and environmental conditions.
| Parameter | Measurement Condition | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Electric field (50/60 Hz) | 1 m above ground level | Clause 6.2 |
| Magnetic field (50/60 Hz) | 1 m above ground level | Clause 6.3 |
| Measurement bandwidth | At least 10 Hz to 1 kHz | Clause 5.2 |
| Measurement height range | 0.5 m to 2.0 m above ground | Clause 6 |
| Weather conditions | Dry weather, no precipitation | Clause 5.4 |
2. Measurement Methodology
2.1 Electric Field Measurement
The standard specifies that electric field measurements should be performed using a free-body probe with isotropic response. The probe must be held at a height of 1 m above ground level, with the operator positioned at a sufficient distance (typically 2-3 m) to minimize body proximity effects. For overhead transmission lines, measurements are typically taken along a profile perpendicular to the line, extending from the centerline to points where field levels fall below the background level.
Engineering Insight: The 1 m measurement height specified in IEC 62110 represents the approximate height of the human torso for a standing adult, which correlates with the maximum induced current density in the body. This height is also consistent with international exposure guidelines from ICNIRP.
2.2 Magnetic Field Measurement
Magnetic field measurements require a three-axis induction coil probe with isotropic response. The standard addresses the challenge of spatial non-uniformity near complex conductor arrangements. A key concept introduced is the “non-uniformity factor,” which characterizes how rapidly the magnetic field varies with position. This factor is critical for assessing the representativeness of single-point measurements.
Important Note: The 2015 corrigendum (COR1:2015) made significant corrections to the magnetic field figures in Annex B, particularly for double-circuit transmission lines and underground cables. These corrections impact the accuracy of calculated field profiles and the interpretation of non-uniformity effects.
3. Special Measurement Scenarios
Annex B of the standard provides detailed guidance and reference data for specific configurations:
| Configuration | Voltage Class | Key Measurement Challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Single-circuit overhead line | 77 kV to 500 kV | Conductor sag variation with temperature |
| Double-circuit overhead line | 77 kV to 500 kV | Phase sequence effects on field cancellation |
| Distribution line (6.6 kV/100 V) | LV distribution | Close proximity to buildings |
| Underground cables | Various | Surface field above cable trench |
| Substation perimeter | All classes | Multiple source superposition |
For double-circuit transmission lines, the standard extensively analyzes the effect of phase sequence arrangement on magnetic field levels. Transposed configurations can reduce the peak magnetic field by 30-50 % compared to untransposed arrangements by creating partial field cancellation. The corrigendum updated the figures to more accurately represent real conductor geometries and load conditions.
4. Uncertainty and Reporting
Clause 7 addresses measurement uncertainty, which is a critical aspect of compliance assessment. The standard identifies primary sources of uncertainty including instrument calibration, probe positioning, environmental factors, and temporal variation of load current. Combined uncertainty should be calculated in accordance with ISO/IEC Guide 98-3 (GUM).
Measurement reports must include: date and time, meteorological conditions, instrument details (including calibration date), measurement locations (with GPS coordinates if available), conductor configuration data, load conditions, and a full uncertainty budget.
Critical Compliance Note: Temporal variation is a major source of uncertainty in magnetic field measurements. Load currents on transmission lines can vary by a factor of 3 or more over a 24-hour period. Single measurements may not be representative of long-term exposure. The standard recommends multiple measurements at different times or continuous monitoring for critical assessments.
5. Engineering Design Insights
- Phase sequence optimization: For new transmission line projects, optimizing the phase arrangement can significantly reduce magnetic field levels at the edge of the right-of-way without additional cost. Simulation tools based on IEC 62110 methodology should be used during the design phase.
- Underground vs. overhead: Underground cables produce negligible electric fields at the surface but can produce higher localized magnetic fields directly above the cable trench. The width of the “high field zone” is narrower than for overhead lines.
- Substation measurements: Substation EMF mapping is particularly challenging due to the superposition of fields from multiple sources (busbars, transformers, circuit breakers). The standard recommends grid-based measurement with a spacing of 1-5 m depending on the field gradient.
Pro Tip: When performing magnetic field measurements near double-circuit transmission lines, always document the phase sequence arrangement (transposed vs. untransposed). The difference in peak field levels between these configurations can exceed 50 %, making this single parameter one of the most important inputs for measurement interpretation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What is the difference between IEC 62110 and ICNIRP guidelines?
IEC 62110 specifies how to measure EMF levels, while ICNIRP guidelines establish exposure limits. IEC 62110 provides the measurement procedures used to assess compliance with ICNIRP or other national exposure limits.
Q2: Why was corrigendum 1 issued in 2015?
Corrigendum 1 corrected errors in several Annex B figures, particularly for magnetic field profiles under double-circuit transmission lines and underground cables. The corrections better represent actual field behavior and non-uniformity effects.
Q3: Does IEC 62110 apply to DC power systems?
No, IEC 62110 specifically addresses AC power systems at 50/60 Hz. DC power systems and their static magnetic fields are covered by separate standards, including IEC 61786 for DC magnetic fields.
Q4: How often should measurement equipment be calibrated?
The standard recommends annual calibration of EMF measurement instruments with traceability to national standards. Field probes should be checked for zero-offset drift before each measurement session.
