Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
IEC 62098: Evaluation of Thermal Endurance of Insulating Materials — Guidelines for Test Procedures
The thermal endurance of electrical insulating materials is the single most important factor determining the operational lifetime of electrical equipment — from transformer windings and motor stators to cable insulation and printed circuit boards. Every 10 °C increase in operating temperature above the rated thermal class can halve the insulation lifetime, making accurate thermal endurance characterization essential for reliable equipment design. IEC 62098 provides comprehensive guidelines for conducting thermal endurance tests on insulating materials, establishing standardized protocols for determining the temperature index (TI) and relative thermal endurance index (RTE) that form the basis of the IEC 60085 thermal classification system.
Tip IEC 62098 is the procedural companion to IEC 60216 (thermal endurance properties) and IEC 60085 (thermal classification). While IEC 60216 provides the statistical framework for data analysis, IEC 62098 gives the practical “how-to” guidance for conducting the aging tests, selecting diagnostic properties, and interpreting results.
Scope and Thermal Aging Principles
IEC 62098 applies to all solid electrical insulating materials — including varnishes, resins, impregnating compounds, laminates, films, fibrous materials, and molded parts — for which thermal endurance is a relevant design parameter. The standard covers both the conventional aging-and-test protocol and the analytical methods for deriving lifetime-temperature relationships. The fundamental principle is accelerated thermal aging: materials are exposed to elevated temperatures (typically 120–300 °C depending on the material class) for defined periods, followed by measurement of a selected diagnostic property to determine the end-point criterion for failure.
The standard recommends testing at a minimum of three (preferably four) aging temperatures spanning the expected thermal class of the material. The highest aging temperature should produce failure within 100–200 hours, while the lowest should extend to at least 5000 hours to provide reliable extrapolation to service temperatures. This range corresponds to an acceleration factor of approximately 25–50 between the highest and lowest test temperatures for materials following the Arrhenius model. The selection of aging temperatures requires careful judgment: too narrow a range reduces extrapolation accuracy, while too wide a range risks introducing degradation mechanisms that do not occur at service temperatures.
| Thermal Class (IEC 60085) | Temperature Index Range | Typical Aging Temperatures (°C) | Diagnostic Property Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class Y (90) | 90–104 | 120, 110, 100, 90 | Tensile strength, dielectric breakdown |
| Class A (105) | 105–119 | 140, 130, 120, 110 | Flexural strength, insulation resistance |
| Class B (130) | 130–154 | 170, 158, 145, 135 | Dielectric strength at power frequency |
| Class F (155) | 155–179 | 200, 185, 170, 158 | Weight loss (TGA), elongation at break |
| Class H (180) | 180–199 | 220, 205, 190, 180 | Dissipation factor (tan delta), hardness |
| Class N (200) and above | 200+ | 250, 235, 220, 205 | Compressive strength, thermal conductivity |
Test Procedures and Diagnostic Properties
The test protocol defined in IEC 62098 follows a structured sequence: specimen preparation and conditioning, initial property measurement, exposure to aging temperature in air-circulating ovens with temperature control of ±1 °C, periodic removal and testing of specimens at predetermined intervals, and final determination of the end-point criterion. For each aging temperature, a minimum of 5 specimens must be tested at each of at least 5 exposure times (25 specimens minimum per temperature). The exposure intervals follow a geometric progression — for example, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 days — to cover the expected lifetime range efficiently.
The selection of the diagnostic property is the most critical decision in thermal endurance evaluation. The property must be sensitive to thermal degradation, measurable with good reproducibility, and relevant to the material’s function in service. Commonly used diagnostic properties include: tensile or flexural strength (for structural insulation), dielectric breakdown voltage (for electrical insulation), dissipation factor / tan delta (for capacitor and cable insulation), weight loss by thermogravimetric analysis (for thin coatings and impregnants), and elongation at break (for flexible insulating materials). The end-point criterion is typically defined as a 50% reduction from the initial value of the selected property — the “halving criterion” — which has been empirically validated across decades of insulation testing.
Warning The choice of diagnostic property can significantly affect the resulting temperature index. A material may show excellent thermal endurance based on mechanical properties but poor endurance based on dielectric properties, or vice versa. IEC 62098 strongly recommends testing at least two diagnostic properties — one mechanical and one electrical — and reporting both temperature indices to provide a complete picture of thermal performance.
Data analysis follows the Arrhenius model: the logarithm of time-to-failure is plotted against the reciprocal of absolute aging temperature (1/T in Kelvin⁻¹), producing a straight line whose slope yields the activation energy of the degradation reaction. The temperature index (TI) is the temperature at which the material reaches the end-point criterion in 20,000 hours. The relative thermal endurance index (RTE) compares the TI of the test material to that of a reference material of known thermal class, providing a relative ranking rather than an absolute temperature rating. IEC 62098 provides detailed statistical procedures for calculating confidence intervals on the TI and for detecting outliers in the aging data using the Grubbs or Dixon tests.
Engineering Design Insights for Insulation System Reliability
Practical application of IEC 62098 reveals several important considerations that extend beyond the laboratory. The most significant is the difference between the thermal endurance of a single material (as measured by IEC 62098) and the performance of an insulation system — the combination of multiple materials in their operational configuration. An insulation system typically includes conductors, ground insulation, inter-turn insulation, impregnating resin, and protective coatings, each with different thermal aging characteristics. The system’s thermal class is determined by the weakest material, a fact that drives the need for system-level thermal evaluation standards such as IEC 61857 (electrical insulation system evaluation).
Another critical insight is the influence of environmental factors on thermal endurance. The presence of moisture, oxygen, electrical stress, and mechanical vibration can accelerate thermal degradation by factors of 2–10 compared to purely thermal aging. The synergistic effect of combined thermal and electrical stress — known as “multi-factor aging” — is particularly important for high-voltage equipment. For example, partial discharge activity in a motor stator winding at elevated temperature can erode the organic varnish in 1000 hours, whereas thermal aging alone might require 20,000 hours to produce equivalent degradation. IEC 62098 provides guidance for multi-factor aging tests in an informative annex.
| Factor | Acceleration Mechanism | Relative Severity | Design Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxygen (oxidation) | Free radical chain reactions | 2–5× over inert atmosphere | Hermetic sealing, nitrogen blanket |
| Moisture (hydrolysis) | Ester bond cleavage in polyesters | 3–8× over dry conditions | Hydrophobic coatings, drainage |
| Electrical stress (PD) | Ion bombardment, ozone generation | 5–10× thermal-only aging | Partial discharge suppression |
| Mechanical vibration | Fatigue cracking of embrittled material | 2–4× static condition | Vibration dampening, flexible terminations |
For design engineers, the temperature index derived from IEC 62098 serves as a critical input for lifecycle cost analysis. Selecting a material with a TI that is one thermal class higher than required (e.g., Class F instead of Class B for a motor designed for Class B temperature rise) can extend insulation life from 20,000 to over 100,000 hours — a factor of 5 improvement — at a material cost increase of typically only 5–15%. This trade-off between initial cost and reliability is particularly relevant for equipment in inaccessible locations, such as offshore wind turbines, subsea cable systems, and nuclear power plant auxiliary motors, where unplanned replacement costs can be 10–50 times the original equipment cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What is the difference between Temperature Index (TI) and Relative Thermal Endurance (RTE)?
TI is an absolute temperature rating: the temperature in degrees Celsius at which the material reaches the end-point criterion in 20,000 hours. RTE is a comparative index that expresses the thermal endurance of the test material as a percentage of that of a known reference material. RTE is useful when the reference material’s long-term service experience provides confidence in the comparison, while TI is preferred for new materials where no reference exists.
Q2: How long does a complete thermal endurance evaluation take?
A full evaluation according to IEC 62098 requires at least 5000 hours of aging at the lowest test temperature, plus specimen preparation and data analysis — totaling 8–12 months. This long duration is a recognized limitation, and the standard includes provisions for shorter screening tests (500–1000 hours at higher temperatures) to be used for material development and quality control, with full qualification testing reserved for final verification.
Q3: Can IEC 62098 be applied to nanocomposite insulating materials?
Yes, the standard’s principles apply to all solid insulating materials, including nanocomposites. However, nanofillers can introduce unique degradation mechanisms — such as nanoparticle agglomeration at elevated temperatures or catalytic effects on polymer chain scission — that may not follow simple Arrhenius behavior. The standard recommends additional characterization techniques, such as thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry, to validate the Arrhenius model assumption for novel materials.
Q4: How should the end-point criterion be selected for multi-functional insulating materials?
For materials serving multiple functions (e.g., mechanical support plus electrical insulation), IEC 62098 recommends establishing end-point criteria for each critical function and then reporting the most conservative TI. For example, a laminate used as both a structural support and a dielectric barrier should be tested for both flexural strength (mechanical) and dielectric breakdown voltage (electrical), with the TI reported at the lower of the two values to ensure adequate performance for all functions.
