Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
D6395-11 – Standard Test Method Technical Guide
ASTM D6395-11, formally recognized as the Standard Test Method for Flatwise Flexural Impact Resistance of Rigid Plastics, establishes a specialized pendulum impact procedure distinctly tailored for evaluating surface degradation. Unlike the traditional edge-wise impact methods (D256), this method strikes the specimen on its wide face with the thickness dimension perpendicular to the pendulum swing. This configuration makes it particularly valuable for quantifying the loss of impact strength caused by weathering, UV exposure, or chemical surface attack at a significantly higher productivity rate than larger-scale impact tests.
📐 Specimen Geometry and Critical Dimensions
The precision of this test hinges upon strict geometric control to ensure consistent stress distribution across the specimen during impact. The standard defines specific dimensional requirements to facilitate valid comparative data.
| 🟦 Parameter | 📏 Definition | 🎯 Specified Value |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Thickness | Nominal specimen depth | 1.60 mm (0.0625 in.) |
| Cantilever Span Ratio | Clamp top to strike centerline distance divided by thickness | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
| Impact Orientation | Specimen depth relative to pendulum swing | Perpendicular (Flatwise) |
| Clamping Method | Specimen fixture | Firmly clamped at one end |
🛠️ Technical Setup Note: If specimens deviate from the standard 1.60 mm thickness, the distance between the top of the clamp and the centerline of the striking edge must be recalculated to strictly maintain the 2.5 ± 0.1 ratio. Failure to do so introduces significant variation in the shear-to-tensile stress ratio, invalidating comparisons.
⚙️ Impact Methodology and Procedural Efficiency
The test method operates by striking the wide face of the rigid plastic strip with a pendulum. Because the strike is applied to the flat surface, the stressed layer represents the exact surface condition of the specimen (e.g., weathered vs. unweathered). A key procedural advantage of this method over alternatives like Gardner Impact (D5420) is that it allows for multiple impacts along the length of a single specimen. This provides critical data on within-specimen variability and significantly improves the throughput of accelerated weathering instruments.
📊 Key Measured Properties and Application Scope
This standard serves primarily as a comparative tool for assessing relative changes in impact resistance against a control. It is exceptionally sensitive to the development of surface cracks or a brittle surface layer, which produces a marked lowering of impact strength when the exposed surface is placed in tension during the test.
However, the method has specific limitations. It is not generally applicable to nonrigid plastics or elastomers that do not fracture or undergo permanent deformation in flexure. Furthermore, normalization of results to unit cross-sectional area only partly compensates for thickness variation because the ratio of shear stress to tensile stress increases with thickness, making the test most valid for samples of approximately equal thickness.
⚠️ Critical Data Interpretation Warning: As stated in Section 1.4, the standard explicitly warns that normalizing impact resistance to cross-sectional area does not fully correct for thickness differences. The influence of shear stress becomes greater in thicker specimens at a fixed cantilever length, affecting ductile failure modes more than brittle ones. Always compare specimens of closely matched thickness.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
🔍 What specifically differentiates D6395 from the standard Izod impact test (D256)?
A: The primary differentiator is specimen orientation. D256 strikes specimens on the edge with the depth dimension parallel to the swing. D6395 strikes the specimen on its wide face with the depth dimension perpendicular to the swing, directly targeting the surface layer for sensitivity to weathering.
💡 How does this test handle specimens of varying thickness?
A: While the standard thickness is 1.60 mm, other thicknesses can be used if the clamp-to-striking-edge distance equals 2.5 ± 0.1 times the specimen thickness. The standard cautions that normalizing data for thickness differences only partially corrects the results due to changing stress ratios.
⚡ Can this method be used for elastomers or flexible plastics?
A: No. Per Section 1.6, the method is not generally applicable to nonrigid plastics or elastomers that do not exhibit fracture, permanent deformation, or yielding in flexure. It is strictly intended for rigid plastics undergoing brittle or semi-ductile failure.
📌 Why is this method preferred for accelerated weathering studies over other impact tests?
A: The flatwise configuration places the weathered surface directly into tension. Simultaneously, the smaller specimen size (compared to Gardner Impact) allows for much higher productivity in weathering instruments and provides multiple data points from a single specimen to measure surface embrittlement progression across the exposed area.