Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
ASTM D5517-14 (Reapproved 2021) establishes a standard test method for determining the extractability of metals from art materials. This method is specifically designed to simulate the acid potential of human gastric juice, providing a rigorous assessment of potential metal migration that could occur if an art material is ingested. The standard is widely referenced for safety evaluations and regulatory compliance in the art materials industry.
The scope of D5517-14 specifically covers the extraction of metals from art materials using an extractant designed to mimic the acid environment of the stomach. It is adapted from the European Toy Safety Standard, EN 71-3:1994, but introduces key distinctions. Unlike Specification F963, which conducts extractions at room temperature, this test method requires the extraction to be performed at body temperature (37 °C), making it more rigorous and resulting in a higher quantity of extracted metal. A critical aspect of this standard is that it must be applied to the art material as a whole, rather than individual ingredients, to provide a more realistic and accurate estimate of soluble metal content.
The extraction procedure outlined in D5517-14 is precisely defined to ensure reproducibility. The key parameters differentiate it from similar international standards:
| 🔍 Feature | 📐 D5517-14 | 🎯 F963 | ⚡ EN 71-3:1994 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extraction Temperature | Body Temperature (37 °C) | Room Temperature (20-25°C) | Body Temperature (37 °C) |
| Solvent Extraction Step | Not required for waxes/oil-based products | Not specified | Required |
| Acceptable Metal Levels | Not specified | Specified | Specified |
| Sample Type | Art material as a whole | Toy material | Toy material |
Following the extraction, the concentration of soluble metals must be determined using specific analytical methods. D5517-14 references several parts of the ISO 3856 series and USEPA SW-846 for the quantification of specific elements. The primary methods rely heavily on atomic absorption and spectrophotometric techniques.
| 🟦 Metal Analyte | 📏 Reference Standard | 🎯 Determination Technique |
|---|---|---|
| Lead (Pb) | ISO 3856-1 | Flame AAS / Dithiazone Spectrophotometry |
| Antimony (Sb) | ISO 3856-2 | Flame AAS / Rhodamine B Spectrophotometry |
| Barium (Ba) | ISO 3856-3 | Flame Atomic Emission Spectrometry |
| Cadmium (Cd) | ISO 3856-4 | Flame AAS / Polarography |
| Hexavalent Chromium | ISO 3856-5 | Diphenylcarbazide Spectrophotometry |
| Total Chromium | ISO 3856-6 | Flame AAS |
The laboratory analysis must use water conforming to ISO 3696 specifications and adhere to the general practices outlined in ASTM E180 for evaluating precision. The rigorous extraction conditions, combined with these high-precision analytical references, ensure the reliability of the test results for determining the extractability of metals from the complex matrices of art materials.
D5517-14 is more rigorous because it requires the extraction to be conducted at body temperature (37 °C) rather than at room temperature. This higher temperature closely mimics the environment of the human digestive system and results in the extraction of a larger quantity of metal, providing a more conservative and health-relevant estimate of potential exposure.
No. D5517-14 explicitly states that no specific acceptable metal levels are specified within this test method. It is strictly a standardized extraction procedure. The resulting extractable metal content is typically evaluated against external health-based limits, such as those referenced in labeling standards like ASTM D4236 or various international regulatory frameworks.
While D5517-14 is adapted from EN 71-3:1994, it has two major differences: (1) It does not require a solvent extraction step for processing waxes or oil-based products, and (2) it does not specify specific acceptable metal levels, leaving the interpretation of results to other regulatory or labeling standards.
The standard is clear on this point: it should be applied to the art material as a whole. The rationale (discussed in Appendix X1) confirms that testing the whole material is expected to give a more accurate estimate of soluble metal than extrapolating from testing individual ingredients, as chemical interactions can occur within the complex matrix of the final art material.