Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
This standard, designated D4149-82 (Reapproved 2012), provides a classification of both qualitative and quantitative techniques for the collection of phytoplankton from inland surface waters. The selection of a specific technique is critically dependent upon the study objectives. An essential consideration in method selection is the highly uneven distribution of phytoplankton organisms, both temporally and spatially. The principal factors to consider are this uneven distribution, composition, and abundance in space and time.
Organisms of the phytoplankton communities are collected and studied for many reasons. In designing a sampling program, the investigator must take into consideration the uniqueness of each study area and the natural characteristics of phytoplankton communities, including their rapid succession and patchy abundance.
The standard clearly separates sampling apparatus into qualitative and quantitative categories. Qualitative samplers are primarily used to determine the presence, diversity, and relative abundance of species. Quantitative samplers are designed to collect organisms from a known volume of water to calculate precise abundance and biomass values.
| 🟦 Sampler Category | 🎯 Quantitative / Qualitative | 📐 Specific Devices |
|---|---|---|
| Conical Tow Nets | Qualitative | Constructed of silk bolting cloth or nylon |
| Pumps | Qualitative | Systems for discrete depth collection |
| Clarke-Bumpus & Juday Samplers | Quantitative | Closing plankton samplers for specific depths |
| Water Sampling Bottles | Quantitative | Discrete depth water samples (e.g., Van Dorn, Niskin) |
| Depth-Integrating Samplers | Quantitative | Integrated samples over a depth interval |
Most qualitative samplers are cone-shaped nets. Nets, however, are generally ineffective for quantitative work due to clogging, mesh size biases, and net avoidance. The quantitative samplers listed in the standard are specifically designed to overcome these limitations and provide reliable numerical data.
Phytoplankton are frequently differentiated on the basis of size. The generally accepted size ranges are critical for selecting the correct sampling gear, as different meshes and devices are required for different fractions. The species composition and abundance of phytoplankton are directly related to water quality. Phytoplankton directly affect dissolved oxygen concentrations, pH, levels of certain solutes, and the optical properties of the water column.
| 🟦 Class | 📏 Size Range | 🔭 Sampling Implications |
|---|---|---|
| Macroplankton | >500 µm | Easily retained by nets |
| Microplankton (Net Plankton) | 10 to 500 µm | Standard net plankton fraction |
| Nannoplankton | 10 to 50 µm | Passes through most nets |
| Ultraplankton | <10 µm | Requires bottles or pumps |
The interconnectedness of phytoplankton with water quality underscores the importance of proper sampling. Adequate spatial and temporal replication is needed to track rapid changes, such as blooms or succession events, which the standard notes can occur within a 1-to-2-week period.
🔍 Why is the uneven distribution of phytoplankton the principal factor to consider when sampling?
The uneven distribution of both abundance and composition in space and time makes it very difficult to collect a representative sample from a given area. This makes replication and an adequate vertical and horizontal sampling program essential.
💡 What are the generally accepted size ranges for phytoplankton classification?
© 2026 TNLab — This article is a technical interpretation for reference only. The original standard as published by ASTM International takes precedence.