Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
ASTM D3919-15 establishes the standard practice for the quantitative determination of trace elements in water, wastewater, and various aqueous matrices using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry (GFAAS). This technique is specifically designed for analytes present at concentration levels below the optimum range of direct flame atomic absorption, providing significantly enhanced detection limits. The standard serves as a guiding framework, emphasizing that the analyst must follow the specific instructions provided by the equipment manufacturer due to differences between various instrument models.
This practice broadly applies to the analysis of trace elements in fresh water and wastewater. The individual standard test methods linked to this practice specify the exact wavelengths, estimated detection limits, and optimum concentration ranges for specific elements. As stated in Section 1.2, concentration ranges can be adjusted by varying the volume of sample injected or the instrumental settings, or by using a secondary wavelength.
Per Section 1.3 of the standard, this technique is generally not applicable to brines and seawater without the application of specialized techniques. These include the separation of trace elements from the salt matrix, careful temperature control through ramping techniques, or the use of matrix modifiers. The standard is written in SI units, and the user is responsible for establishing appropriate safety and health practices (Section 1.6).
The core principle, per Section 4.1, involves using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer in conjunction with an electrothermal graphite furnace to atomize the sample. The graphite furnace (Section 3.2.1) is an electrothermal device capable of reaching the specific temperatures required for the element being determined.
The process typically follows a staged temperature program:
| 🟦 Stage | 📐 Purpose | 🌡️ Typical Temp. Range |
|---|---|---|
| Drying | Evaporate the solvent (aqueous matrix) | 90 – 150 °C |
| Ashing (Charring) | Decompose organic matrix and volatilize interferents | 300 – 1200 °C |
| Atomization | Rapidly heat to vaporize and atomize the analyte | 1500 – 2700 °C |
| Cleaning | Remove any residual sample to prevent carryover | 2600 – 2800 °C |
A platform (Section 3.2.2), a flat piece of grooved or ungrooved pyrolytic graphite inserted in the graphite tube, is frequently employed. The platform delays atomization until the furnace atmosphere has reached a stable temperature, which is critical for reducing vapor-phase interferences.
The specific wavelengths, estimated detection limits, and optimum concentration ranges are defined in the individual methods. Samples containing concentrations higher than the optimum range may be diluted or analyzed by other techniques. Quality control practices are essential, and the standard references several ASTM documents for a robust assurance program, including D2777 (Precision and Bias), D5810 (Spiking), D5847 (Writing QC Specifications), and D4841 (Estimation of Holding Time).
| 🧪 Element | 📏 Wavelength (nm) | ⚡ Typical Atomization Temp (°C) | 💡 Common Matrix Modifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead (Pb) | 283.3 | 1500 – 2000 | Pd + Mg(NO₃)₂ |
| Cadmium (Cd) | 228.8 | 1500 – 1800 | NH₄H₂PO₄ + Mg(NO₃)₂ |
| Chromium (Cr) | 357.9 | 2200 – 2600 | Mg(NO₃)₂ |
| Copper (Cu) | 324.8 | 2000 – 2500 | Pd + Mg(NO₃)₂ |
This practice is specifically intended for measuring trace elements at concentration levels below the optimum range of direct flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Section 1.1). GFAAS extends detection limits by several orders of magnitude, making it suitable for sub-ppb to low-ppm levels in many cases. The specific optimum ranges for each element are defined in the individual test methods referenced by this practice.
No. Section 1.3 explicitly states that this technique is generally not applicable to brines and seawater without the application of specialized techniques. The high salt content creates severe background absorption and chemical interferences. Successful analysis typically requires matrix modification