Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
This standard test method, designated D3512/D3512M‑22, covers the determination of a fabric’s propensity to form pills and other related surface changes using the Random Tumble Pilling Tester. The procedure is generally applicable to all types of woven and knitted apparel fabrics. It is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D13 on Textiles and provides a standardized means of simulating surface wear in a controlled laboratory environment.
The values in this standard are stated in either SI units or inch‑pound units. Each system must be used independently of the other, as the values in each system may not be exact equivalents. Combining values from the two systems may result in non‑conformance with the standard. For all related terminology, refer to Terminology D4850 (Fabrics and Fabric Test Methods) and Terminology D123 (General Textile Terminology).
| 🟦 Standard | 🟦 Method Name | ⚡ Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| D3511/D3511M | Brush Pilling Tester | Nylon Brush |
| D3512/D3512M | Random Tumble Pilling Tester | Cork‑Lined Tumble Chamber |
| D3514/D3514M | Elastomeric Pad Tester | Elastomeric Pad Abrader |
| D4970/D4970M | Martindale Tester | Martindale Abrasion Tester |
Conditioning of specimens is a critical prerequisite to testing. As mandated by the referenced Practice D1776/D1776M, all fabric samples must be conditioned to moisture equilibrium in a standard atmosphere before being placed in the random tumble pilling tester. The test specimens are then loaded into the cork‑lined chambers of the tester and subjected to a specified tumbling cycle.
After the tumbling cycle, the fabric surface is evaluated against the ASTM Adjunct Set of 5 Photographic Standards for Random Tumble Pilling Test (Adjunct No. ADJD3512). Technicians compare the tested specimens to these photographic standards to assign a numerical rating that describes the degree of pilling, fuzzing, and overall surface change.
| 📊 Rating | 📏 Surface Description |
|---|---|
| 5 | No Change: No pilling or fuzzing visible on the specimen surface. |
| 4 | Slight Change: Slight fuzzing and/or isolated, sporadic pills. |
| 3 | Moderate Change: Moderate fuzzing and/or distinct pills covering part of the surface. |
| 2 | Pronounced Change: Pronounced fuzzing and/or numerous pills covering the surface. |
| 1 | Severe Change: Dense fuzzing and heavy pilling over the entire specimen surface. |
The evaluation focuses on the number, density, and size of pills as well as the degree of fuzzing. A higher rating (e.g., 5) indicates excellent pilling resistance, while a lower rating (e.g., 1) indicates a high propensity for pilling. The results from D3512 must be clearly reported along with the rating scale and photographic standard used. For broader context, other pilling test methods are available, including the Brush Pilling Tester (D3511/D3511M), Elastomeric Pad (D3514/D3514M), and the Martindale Tester (D4970/D4970M). Each method induces pilling through a different mechanical action and may produce different results on the same fabric, making the selection of the appropriate method critical to the evaluation.
The purpose is to determine the propensity of a textile fabric to form pills and undergo other related surface changes (such as fuzzing) when subjected to a random tumbling action in a cork‑lined chamber. It is generally applicable to all types of woven and knitted apparel fabrics.
Pilling resistance is rated by visually comparing the tested fabric specimen to the ASTM Adjunct “Set of 5 Photographic Standards for Random Tumble Pilling Test” (ADJD3512). The rating scale ranges from 5 (no surface change) to 1 (severe pilling and fuzzing over the entire surface).
Fabrics that have been treated with a silicone resin generally cannot be reliably tested using this method. The silicone tends to transfer from the fabric to the cork liners, altering the abrasive characteristics of the chamber and causing erroneous pilling results.
The values are stated in either SI units or inch‑pound units. Each system must be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non‑conformance with the standard.