Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
D2968-22 – Standard Test Method Technical Guide
📐 Scope and Key Definitions
This test method, designated D2968-22, covers the determination by microprojection of the percentage of medullated fibers, specifically med and kemp fibers, in wool or other animal fibers such as mohair, cashmere, alpaca, or camel’s hair in their various forms. The standard does not address all safety concerns, and users should establish appropriate safety practices.
Key terminology includes kemp fiber, med fiber, medulla, and medullated fiber. For complete definitions, refer to Terminology D4845 relating to Wool and D123 for general textile terms.
⚙️ Test Method Procedure
The test method involves examining magnified images of a specimen of animal fibers using a microprojection device. All medullated fibers are measured and classified as either med fibers or kemp fibers. The observed numbers of med and kemp fibers are then expressed as percentages of the total number of fiber images examined. This procedure is based on standardized practices for fiber diameter measurement by microprojection as referenced in Test Method D2130, though that standard has been withdrawn.
📊 Significance and Data Interpretation
The determination of med and kemp fibers in wool and other animal fibers is crucial for manufacturers of woven or knitted fabrics due to the apparent dye resistance and light reflectance qualities of these fibers. It is important to note that not all kemp fibers resist dye nor do all med fibers accept dye normally; a proportion of kemp fibers may exhibit varied behavior.
Test Method D2968 is intended for acceptance testing of commercial shipments. However, due to limited interlaboratory precision studies, caution is advised. In case of disputes, comparative testing between laboratories, guided by statistical analysis such as Student’s t-test, is recommended as outlined in section 5.1.1.
| 🟦 Fiber Type | 📏 Definition | 🎯 Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Med Fiber | A medullated fiber with a continuous or interrupted medulla. | Accepts dye normally in most cases; affects fabric appearance. |
| Kemp Fiber | A medullated fiber with a wide, continuous medulla often extending the full length. | Exhibits dye resistance and high light reflectance; may cause visual defects. |
| 🟦 Standard | 📏 Title | 🎯 Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| D123 | Terminology Relating to Textiles | Provides definitions for general textile terms. |
| D4845 | Terminology Relating to Wool | Defines terms specific to wool and animal fibers. |
| D2130 (Withdrawn) | Test Method for Diameter of Wool and Other Animal Fibers by Microprojection | Referenced for microprojection measurement techniques. |
⚠️ Caution: The precision of Test Method D2968 for med and kemp fibers has only been ascertained for a few types of animal fibers. Users should conduct comparative tests to ensure reliability in acceptance testing, as per section 5.1.
💡 Tip: For accurate classification, ensure that fiber images are properly magnified and medullated fibers are distinguished based on continuous or interrupted medulla patterns as per terminology definitions in D4845.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
🔍 What is the scope of standard D2968?
Standard D2968 covers the determination of med and kemp fibers in wool and other animal fibers like mohair, cashmere, alpaca, and camel’s hair using microprojection.
💡 How are med and kemp fibers classified in the test method?
In the test method, medullated fibers are classified as med fibers or kemp fibers based on their medulla characteristics when examined under magnification.
⚡ What is the significance of med and kemp fibers in textile manufacturing?
Med and kemp fibers are important due to their dye resistance and light reflectance properties, which can affect the appearance and quality of woven or knitted fabrics.
📌 What should be done if there are disputes in test results?
In case of disputes, comparative tests should be conducted with a group of homogeneous test specimens randomly assigned to each laboratory. The average results should be compared using Student’s t-test for unpaired data, with an acceptable probability level chosen by the parties involved. If bias is identified, it must be corrected or acknowledged in future tests.