Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
ASTM D2752/D2752M −88 (Reapproved 2019) specifies standardized test methods for measuring the relative degree of openness, or degree of fiberization, of milled asbestos fibers using air permeability instruments. The standard is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee C17 on Fiber-Reinforced Cement Products.
The standard outlines two distinct test methods. Method A, utilizing the Rapid Surface Area apparatus, is the recommended procedure and is limited to fibers with an effective surface area ranging from 10 to 250 dm²/g (490 to 12,000 ft²/lb). Method B is an alternative procedure using the Dyckerhoff apparatus, covering fibers within the range of 10 to 600 Dyckerhoff seconds.
| 🟦 Feature | 📏 Method A (Rapid Surface Area) | 🎯 Method B (Dyckerhoff) |
|---|---|---|
| Instrument | Rapid Surface Area Apparatus | Dyckerhoff Apparatus |
| Measurement Range | 10 to 250 dm²/g [490 to 12,000 ft²/lb] | 10 to 600 Dyckerhoff seconds |
| Operating Principle | Total resistance to air flow equals a fixed hydraulic pressure head, measured against a calibrated capillary tube. | Measures resistance to air flow of a compressed specimen of fixed weight and volume. |
In both test methods, the fundamental measurement is based on the resistance to air flow of a compressed specimen of fixed weight and volume. The specific setup and calculations differ between the two methods.
For Method A, the apparatus is meticulously arranged so that the total resistance to air flow remains equal to a fixed hydraulic pressure head. This total resistance is the sum of the resistance offered by the specimen and the pressure drop across a calibrated capillary tube of known resistance. The specific contribution of the specimen to the total resistance is measured on a manometer calibrated directly in specific surface area units (dm²/g).
Method B offers a simpler, alternative procedure. While it does not provide a direct surface area reading in surface units, it is widely used for quality control within the defined range, measuring the time required for a fixed volume of air to pass through the specimen.
The primary property measured is the specific surface area (in dm²/g for Method A) or a relative time value (in seconds for Method B), which directly correlates to the degree of fiberization. Higher surface area or longer permeability times indicate a higher degree of fiberization (more open fiber).
The standard emphasizes that values stated in SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems results in non-conformance with the standard. The user must consistently utilize one system of units throughout the testing process.
The standard provides test methods for measuring the relative degree of openness or degree of fiberization of milled asbestos fibers using air permeability instruments. This allows manufacturers and quality control laboratories to assess the processing characteristics and quality of the fiber.
Method A uses the Rapid Surface Area apparatus and is the recommended procedure. It provides a direct measurement of effective surface area (10 to 250 dm²/g). Method B uses the Dyckerhoff apparatus and is an alternative procedure, measuring in Dyckerhoff seconds (10 to 600 seconds). Both methods fundamentally rely on measuring the airflow resistance of a compressed specimen.
Differences in the specific gravity of the fibers result in variations in the porosity of the compressed test specimen. Since the measurement of air permeability is highly sensitive to porosity, comparing fibers with different specific gravities would yield results that are influenced by density rather than solely the degree of fiberization, making the comparison invalid.
The standard requires that values in SI units and inch-pound units be treated as entirely separate and independent standards; they must not be combined. Regarding safety, the standard carries a strong health warning about the hazards of asbestos dust, mandating that users minimize dust and establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices during testing.