Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Cross-Tooth Companion Flanges, Type T – Design and Standard Cancellation
SAE J1945, originally issued in 1990 and cancelled in August 2006, defined the dimensions and tolerances for cross-tooth companion flanges Type T used in driveline applications for commercial vehicles and buses. This article provides an overview of the standard, its engineering design principles, reasons for cancellation, and guidance for engineers transitioning to current ISO equivalents.
1. Overview and Scope
SAE J1945 specified the nominal dimensions and tolerances affecting interchangeability of cross-tooth companion flanges Type T. The scope included interfaces between gearbox flanges and driveshaft flanges. While the standard is no longer active, understanding its requirements is valuable for maintaining legacy systems and appreciating the evolution in driveline component design.
🗒️ The Type T flange employs a form-locking design where torque is transmitted through cross-tooth engagement, reducing reliance on bolt clamping force. This design allows smaller and fewer bolts (only four) compared to friction-based flanges specified in SAE J1946 for Types A and S.
2. Engineering Design and Torque Transmission
The cross-tooth flange joint achieves self-centering through groups of teeth intersecting at 70 degrees. The teeth transmit torque while generating relatively low axial force, which is carried by the bolts. The design simplifies assembly and reduces the required flange or bolt size for a given torque capacity.
Key design parameters from SAE J1945 included outer diameter (D1), bolt circle diameter (D2), inner diameter (D3), machined back diameter (D4), flange width (G), hole diameter (d1), and hole chamfer (d2). Tolerances were specified with a total run-out of 0.04 mm, which later proved problematic for manufacturing.
🗒️ Design Insight: The form-locking flange system requires only four bolts, which are smaller than those in comparable friction flanges. The tooth form can be produced on universal milling machines for short runs or surface broaching for mass production, ensuring interchangeability across manufacturers.
3. Cancellation and Migration to ISO Standards
⚠️ SAE J1945 was cancelled in August 2006 due to manufacturability issues with its tolerances. The total run-out tolerance of 0.04 mm was found not feasible in production, whereas the equivalent ISO 8667 specifies a circular run-out of 0.12 mm, which is achievable. As a result, ISO 8667 is now the preferred standard for gearbox flanges, complemented by ISO 12667 for propeller shaft flanges.
Despite some dimensional differences between SAE J1945 and ISO 8667 (e.g., inner diameter D3/d3 and tooth length), these do not affect interchangeability. The following table summarizes key similarities and differences:
| Dimension / Item | SAE J1945 | ISO 8667 | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outer diameter | D1 | d1 | Identical |
| Bolt circle diameter | D2 | d2 | Identical |
| Inner diameter | D3 | d3 | ISO 7 mm larger |
| Tooth length | — | — | SAE 7 mm longer, no interchangeability effect |
| Machined back diameter | D4 | d4 | Identical |
| Flange width | G | l | Identical |
| Hole diameter | d1 | d5 | Identical |
| Hole chamfer | d2 | none | Not specified in ISO |
| Run-out tolerance | Total 0.04 | Circular 0.12 | Critical difference; SAE tolerance not feasible |
Engineers are advised to reference ISO 8667 for Type T gearbox flanges and ISO 12667 for propeller shaft flanges in new designs. The dimensional differences between the standards are minor and do not affect interchangeability, but the relaxed tolerances in ISO 8667 improve manufacturability.
⚠️ Important: SAE J1945 is cancelled. Do not specify it for new designs. Use ISO 8667 for gearbox flanges and ISO 12667 for propeller shaft flanges. Transferring design data from SAE to ISO requires attention to tolerance differences, especially run-out.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was SAE J1945 cancelled?
SAE J1945 was cancelled because its total run-out tolerance of 0.04 mm was found not feasible in production. Manufacturers reported manufacturability issues, making the equivalent ISO 8667, which specifies a circular run-out of 0.12 mm, the preferred standard.
What is the difference between Type T flanges and Types A or S?
Type T flanges use a form-locking (cross-tooth) design to transmit torque, whereas Types A and S in SAE J1946 rely on friction (forcelocking) between flange faces. The form-locking design reduces bolt size and count while providing self-centering through teeth angled at 70 degrees.
Can SAE J1945 flanges be interchanged with ISO 8667 flanges?
Yes, for most dimensions the standards are equivalent, and differences in inner diameter and tooth length do not affect interchangeability. However, engineers should verify that tolerances, particularly run-out, are compatible with their application. The ISO standard offers a more lenient run-out tolerance that improves manufacturability.
What should I do if I have existing designs based on SAE J1945?
Existing designs using SAE J1945 remain functional as long as they are manufactured to the original tolerances, but new designs should migrate to ISO 8667 or ISO 12667. If replacing flanges in service, ensure that the mating parts comply with the applicable standard and that run-out requirements are satisfied.
