Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
CAN CGSB 32.311-2015 (2018) is a critical component of the Canadian Organic Standards suite, developed under the auspices of the Canadian General Standards Board (CGSB). This standard formally establishes the Permitted Substances Lists (PSL) for organic production systems, covering crop production, livestock production, and processing. Initially published in 2015 and amended in 2018, it defines exactly which synthetic and non-synthetic substances may be used in certified organic operations in Canada. The standard is fundamental to the integrity of organic certification, ensuring consistency, transparency, and traceability across all sectors of the organic value chain.
This technical article provides a detailed examination of the scope, technical requirements, implementation considerations, and compliance obligations associated with CAN CGSB 32.311-2015 (2018). It is intended for certification bodies, technical consultants, organic producers, and regulatory professionals involved in organic conformity assessment.
The scope of CAN CGSB 32.311-2015 (2018) encompasses the listing of substances that are permitted for use in organic production. The standard applies to all organic operators, including farms, processors, and handlers who are certified under the Canadian Organic Regime. The PSL is structured into distinct categories based on function:
The 2018 amendment brought important updates, including the addition of new substances, revision of use restrictions, and removal of outdated entries. These changes reflected the latest peer-reviewed science, stakeholder submissions, and alignment efforts with major organic trading partners. It is important to note that the standard must be read in conjunction with CAN CGSB 32.310-2015 (Organic Production Systems – General Principles and Management Standards), which provides the overarching management framework.
The core of the standard is a series of matrices that categorize every permitted substance by its origin (synthetic or non-synthetic), permitted use, and any restrictions or conditions for use. Each entry typically includes the substance name, functional category, allowed forms, and limitations. The following table illustrates representative examples from the standard (note: this is not a complete list and is provided for illustrative purposes only).
| Category | Substance | Type | Specific Use / Condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soil fertility | Bone meal | Non-synthetic | Must be obtained from organically raised animals; prohibited for ruminants unless from certified organic sources. |
| Pest management | Copper sulfate | Synthetic | Permitted as a fungicide; limited to specific crops and soil application; must not be used as a growth regulator. |
| Pest management | Neem oil | Non-synthetic | Permitted for use as an insecticide; must be cold-pressed and without synthetic additives. |
| Livestock health | Ivermectin | Synthetic | Allowed only for emergency veterinary treatment; strict withdrawal period of at least 90 days for meat animals. |
| Processing | Citric acid | Synthetic | Permitted as a pH adjuster; limited to a maximum of 2% of the final product weight. |
| Cleaning | Hydrogen peroxide | Synthetic | Permitted for disinfection of equipment and surfaces; equipment must be rinsed with potable water before use. |
Effective implementation of CAN CGSB 32.311-2015 (2018) requires operators to establish a traceable record of every substance brought onto the operation. Certification bodies (CBs) verify compliance through audits that check substance procurement records, application logs, and product labels. Key implementation steps include:
Non-compliance with the PSL can result in certification suspension or revocation. During an audit, CBs examine several key areas:
The CGSB is expected to continue periodic revisions to the PSL to reflect evolving agricultural science, environmental concerns, and trade dynamics. The standard’s alignment with international counterparts will remain a priority. The 2018 amendment set a strong precedent for responsive, science-based updates that protect organic integrity without stifling innovation.