Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
ASME EA-2G-2010 (2015) — Guidance for EA-2, Energy Assessment for Pumping Systems
📘 ASME EA-2G-2010 is an ASME Technical Report registered with ANSI (ANSI Designation: ASME TR EA-2G-2010) that serves as the companion application guide to ASME EA-2, Energy Assessment for Pumping Systems. Issued September 24, 2010 and reaffirmed in 2015, the guide provides technical background and application details supporting the understanding and application of EA-2: it explains the rationale behind the standard’s technical requirements and supplies technical guidance, application notes, alternative approaches, tips, techniques, rules-of-thumb, and example results from fulfilling the requirements of the assessment standard. The document explicitly states that it is a Technical Report and its content is not normative; the requirements reside in ASME EA-2 itself.
💡 EA-2G is the engineer’s “how-to” handbook: for questions such as how to build a flow-duration curve, how to match a demand profile with one large and one small pump, or how to quantify wasted power, the guide gives step-by-step methods and ready-made table templates that can be applied directly in practice.
1. Purpose of the Guide and Pumping System Basics 📌
Section 1 states the scope and purpose: to serve as an application guide on how to utilize ASME EA-2. Section 2 introduces pumping system fundamentals — system components, piping characteristics, pump curves, and the operating-point concept. An assessment should start from the demand side: first establish the flow and head the process actually needs, then examine the supply side’s efficiency.
| Guide Section | Topic | Core Content |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Introduction to pumping systems | System components, example pumping system, piping and pump curves |
| 3 | Overview of EA-2 | How to read and use the Standard, assessment levels |
| 4 | Organizing the assessment | Goal setting, boundaries, team and plan, energy unit cost summary |
| 5 | Conducting the assessment | Data collection, measurement methods, flow demand analysis |
| 6 | Analysis of data | Baselines, existing-versus-optimal comparison, power-waste analysis |
| 7 | Reporting and documentation | Project summary tables, process diagrams, flow balance, report writing |
2. Flow Demand Analysis and Duration Curves 📊
The guide devotes a full set of figures (Figures 2–7) to analyzing how flow demand varies with time: hourly flow demand in a building, annual variation of flow demand, daily variations, a typical annualized duration curve, a flow-rate duration diagram, and a duration diagram for two pumps — one large and one small. These tools answer one core question: what shape is the system’s actual flow demand profile?
- Duration curve: sort annual flow demand from highest to lowest to show how long high and low flows persist.
- Peak versus base load: distinguish peak flows (possibly lasting only briefly) from base flows (present year-round).
- Pump staging: when demand fluctuates widely, a large-plus-small pump combination saves energy versus a single large pump — the large pump serves peaks, the small pump serves routine base load.
- Data sources: DCS/SCADA history, flowmeter records, and operating hours tabulated by flow interval.
⚠️ If the system spends most of the year at low flow while a large pump runs continuously, there is a classic supply-demand mismatch waste. The guide stresses that sizing and decisions should be based on the flow-duration distribution, not a single design condition.
3. Conducting the Assessment — Technical Essentials 🔧
Sections 4 and 5 explain how to organize and conduct the assessment in detail, with supporting tables including:
| Table | Content | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Energy unit cost summary | Organize tariff structures, demand charges, time-of-use rates |
| 2 | Assessment level overview | Compare Level 1/2/3 purposes and means |
| 3 | Flow duration summary | Tabulate time and energy by flow interval |
| 8 | Measurement methods | Options for measuring flow, pressure, and power |
| 12 | Pump operating hours | Operating logs and hours statistics |
| 14 | Pump efficiency calculations | Step-by-step efficiency calculation from measurements |
On measurement methods, the guide compares clamp-on ultrasonic flowmeters, pressure-differential devices, pump-curve back-calculation, and DCS flow data, emphasizing that measurement uncertainty should be recorded in the report.
4. Data Analysis: Existing-vs-Optimal and Power Waste 🧮
Section 6 is the analytical heart of the guide and presents two complementary frameworks:
- Existing versus optimal analysis (Example 1): compare supplied versus required flow (Figure 9), quantify the unnecessary energy consumed by excess flow, and estimate the optimal energy use after converting to variable-speed control or replacing the pump.
- Power-waste-based analysis (Example 2): decompose “required energy use” into “different types of excess energy use” (Figure 10), quantifying throttling losses, excess-flow losses, and low-efficiency losses to prioritize improvement investments.
💡 The guide’s energy philosophy can be summarized as: first reduce demand (lower flow and head), then raise efficiency (high-efficiency pumps and motors), and finally choose control (variable speed over throttling). Analyzing in this order avoids “amplifying waste with new technology.” Examples show that eliminating excess flow alone can save significant annual electricity cost.
5. Engineering Practice Essentials 🛠️
- 📐 Plot the system curve and operating point: mark the actual operating point on the H-Q diagram from measured head and flow, and compare with BEP.
- ⚙️ Large-small pump staging: for highly variable loads, stage a large and a small pump with optimized on/off strategies.
- 🔍 Life-cycle cost view: evaluate pump and drive options on life-cycle cost, not first cost alone.
- 📋 Standardized reporting: use Section 7 formats — project summary tables, process diagrams, flow balance, and recommendation lists — to support owner decisions and tracking.
- ✅ Complementary certification: combine with ASME assessor certification and the M&V protocol so assessment quality and savings are credible.
🚨 Note the relationship between EA-2G and EA-2: for a compliant assessment, the requirements of ASME EA-2 govern; EA-2G only provides background and guidance and cannot substitute for any requirement of the Standard. Cite the applicable Standard clauses in the report.
6. Frequently Asked Questions ❓
❓ Q: Why is EA-2G a Technical Report rather than a standard?
A: It was published under ANSI Technical Report registration procedures to provide background and application guidance rather than to set requirements; therefore it is not normative. The formal requirements are in ASME EA-2.
A: It was published under ANSI Technical Report registration procedures to provide background and application guidance rather than to set requirements; therefore it is not normative. The formal requirements are in ASME EA-2.
❓ Q: How do I obtain the flow demand profile?
A: Prefer plant DCS/SCADA or historian data; if no automatic records exist, install temporary flow logging over representative production days or tabulate hours by operating mode, then synthesize an annualized duration curve.
A: Prefer plant DCS/SCADA or historian data; if no automatic records exist, install temporary flow logging over representative production days or tabulate hours by operating mode, then synthesize an annualized duration curve.
❓ Q: What are the guide’s two worked examples (Examples 1 and 2) for?
A: They demonstrate two complementary analytical approaches — supply-demand matching and excess-energy decomposition. Readers can apply the tables and methods to their own data to reach quantified conclusions.
A: They demonstrate two complementary analytical approaches — supply-demand matching and excess-energy decomposition. Readers can apply the tables and methods to their own data to reach quantified conclusions.
🔍 Q: When is a Level 3 in-depth assessment worthwhile?
A: For complex systems with highly varying loads or large planned retrofit investments, Level 3 long-term continuous measurement and modeling materially reduce decision risk and ensure reliable savings estimates.
A: For complex systems with highly varying loads or large planned retrofit investments, Level 3 long-term continuous measurement and modeling materially reduce decision risk and ensure reliable savings estimates.
