Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
ASME BTH-1-2017 — Design of Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices
🏗️ ASME BTH-1-2017 establishes design requirements for below-the-hook lifting devices — the load-attaching devices that hang below the crane hook and contact the load directly. Typical products include spreader and lifting beams, C-hooks, plate clamps, coil hooks, sheet lifters, vacuum lifters, lifting magnets, barrel clamps, and grab buckets. The Standard is used together with the safety standard ASME B30.20 (Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices): B30.20 covers use, marking, and inspection, while BTH-1 provides the design criteria. The 2017 edition revises the 2014 edition; it was issued on March 15, 2017, and becomes effective one year after the date of issuance.
💡 Design and use are two sides of the same coin: BTH-1 answers “is it strong enough?”, B30.20 answers “is it used safely?”. Always cite both standards when specifying the design and purchase of lifting devices.
1. Overview and Scope 📌
Chapter 1 covers purpose (1-1), scope (1-2), new and existing devices (1-3), general requirements (1-4), definitions (1-5), symbols (1-6), and references (1-7). The Standard provides design requirements for new devices and the basis for verifying load ratings of existing devices; a uniform set of terms and symbols keeps design documents consistent among designers, manufacturers, and inspection organizations.
2. Lifter Classifications: Design Category and Service Class 🔧
Chapter 2 is the classification framework of BTH-1. Devices are classified by both Design Category (2-2) and Service Class (2-3). The design category reflects the severity of the load spectrum and the consequences of failure, and determines the allowable-stress basis and the need for fatigue evaluation; the service class is assigned according to the proportion of operating time under load and the number of load cycles (see Table 2-3-1), with higher classes indicating more severe service. The classification is the input for all subsequent structural and mechanical calculations.
| Service Class | Typical Duty | Design Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Class 0 | Infrequent use, e.g., installation, removal, or occasional maintenance lifts | Static strength governs; fatigue influence is small |
| Class 1–3 | Periodic use with increasing load time and cycles | Fatigue life evaluation and stricter safety factors are progressively introduced |
| Class 4–5 | Near-continuous severe duty (e.g., steel mills, ports) | Full fatigue design with allowable stress ranges (para. 3-4) is required |
⚠️ The classification must be honest: designing a Class 4 continuous-duty device as Class 0 leads directly to fatigue failure and lost loads. The service class and design category marked on the nameplate must match the load spectrum provided by the user — never downgrade the classification to save cost.
3. Structural and Mechanical Design 🛠️
Chapter 3 covers structural design: member design (3-2) with allowable stresses and limiting width–thickness ratios for compression elements, connection design (3-3) including minimum effective throat thickness of partial-penetration groove welds and minimum fillet weld sizes, and fatigue design (3-4) with allowable stress ranges (Table 3-4.3-1) and fatigue design parameters (Table 3-4.4-1) for cyclic loading.
Chapter 4 covers mechanical design of power-transmitting and load-bearing parts: sheaves (4-2) with groove proportions and diameter ratios, wire rope (4-3), drive systems (4-4), gearing (4-5) with strength factors for load capacity, bearings (4-6) evaluated by L10 life, shafting (4-7) with key sizes and fatigue stress amplification factors, fasteners (4-8), grip support force (4-9), vacuum lifting device design (4-10), and fluid power systems (4-11).
Chapter 5 covers electrical components: motors and brakes (5-2), operator interface (5-3), controllers and auxiliary equipment (5-4), grounding (5-5), power disconnects (5-6), and batteries (5-7). Chapter 6 prescribes design requirements (6-2) and selection/design methods (6-3) for lifting magnets.
| Chapter | Design Subject | Key Requirements (examples) |
|---|---|---|
| Ch. 3 | Structural members, welded connections, fatigue | Allowable stresses, width–thickness limits, minimum weld sizes, stress ranges |
| Ch. 4 | Sheaves, wire rope, gearing, bearings, shafts, fasteners | Sheave diameter ratios, gear strength factors, L10 bearing life, key sizes |
| Ch. 5 | Motors, brakes, controls, grounding | Brake capacity, loss-of-power protection, grounding continuity, disconnects |
| Ch. 6 | Lifting magnets | Magnetic margin, de-energized holding, interface verification |
4. Engineering Practice Essentials 🚧
- 🔍 Selection workflow: define the load spectrum → determine service class and design category → perform structural and mechanical calculations per Chapters 3 and 4 → issue design calcs and drawings → after manufacture, inspect per B30.20 and mark the rated load.
- 🔧 Fatigue first: for high-frequency devices, the weld detail category determines fatigue life; avoid notches, misalignment, and lack of fusion that create stress concentrations.
- 📊 Vacuum and magnetic lifters: verify grip force under worst-case conditions (surface finish, temperature, power loss) and distinguish holding force from support force (4-9).
- 📋 Existing devices: when design documentation is missing, re-verify rated loads per para. 1-3, using stress testing and calculations to reclassify if needed.
5. Frequently Asked Questions ❓
❓ Q: How do BTH-1 and B30.20 relate?
A: BTH-1 is the design standard — strength, fatigue, and component selection criteria; B30.20 is the use and inspection standard — marking, inspection intervals, and discard criteria. B30.20 requires devices to be designed and classified to BTH-1; they must be cited together.
A: BTH-1 is the design standard — strength, fatigue, and component selection criteria; B30.20 is the use and inspection standard — marking, inspection intervals, and discard criteria. B30.20 requires devices to be designed and classified to BTH-1; they must be cited together.
❓ Q: Can I copy the crane’s duty classification for the device?
A: No. Service class applies to the lift device’s own load time and cycle count and differs from crane classification systems (e.g., CMAA/B30.2). Determine the class from the device’s actual duty independently.
A: No. Service class applies to the lift device’s own load time and cycle count and differs from crane classification systems (e.g., CMAA/B30.2). Determine the class from the device’s actual duty independently.
❓ Q: Why do vacuum lifters and magnets have dedicated design sections?
A: Their gripping depends on non-mechanical connections with unique failure modes (vacuum loss, power failure, insufficient remanence), so the Standard separately prescribes grip margin, power-loss protection, and interface verification.
A: Their gripping depends on non-mechanical connections with unique failure modes (vacuum loss, power failure, insufficient remanence), so the Standard separately prescribes grip margin, power-loss protection, and interface verification.
🔍 Q: Does BTH-1 cover slings and shackles?
A: No. BTH-1 covers rigid below-the-hook load-attaching devices; wire rope slings and connectors are covered by ASME B30.9 (Slings) and the respective component standards.
A: No. BTH-1 covers rigid below-the-hook load-attaching devices; wire rope slings and connectors are covered by ASME B30.9 (Slings) and the respective component standards.
