Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
🔑 ASME B17.1-1967 is a foundational document in the ASME Mechanical Power Transmission (B17) family. Its title, Keys and Keyseats, understates its importance: it answers a set of small but decisive questions that govern the reliability of an entire drive train. Given a shaft, how large should the key be? What tolerances apply to the key’s width, height, and length? How deep must the keyseat be cut in the shaft, and how deep in the hub? Which fit class applies to the assembly? And how can a machinist verify keyseat depth and side-face parallelism on the shop floor with the simplest possible instruments? The standard was approved as an American National Standard on 15 September 1967 by the USA Standards Institute (predecessor of ANSI) and designated B17.1-1967; after successive reaffirmations, the 2017 confirmation is the currently applicable text. The source material for this article is a scanned copy, so the discussion follows the standard’s table of contents, chapter structure, and established mechanical power transmission practice.
The standard specifies the size, type, and tolerances of parallel and taper keys and their keyseats, and it supplies the supporting rules for key-to-keyseat fits, depth control of keyseats, chamfers and fillets on keys and keyseats, set screws used over keys, and alignment tolerances of keyseats relative to the shaft axis. Its subject is the keyed joint between a shaft and a hub — the means by which torque is transmitted from a shaft to a gear, sheave, sprocket, or coupling, or in the reverse direction.
The standard has a clear lineage. Individual USA Standards on keys were first issued in the late 1920s and were consolidated with the shafting standards in the 1934 publication Standard Shafting and Stock Keys. A revised issue appeared in 1943 and was withdrawn in 1955 because it was not being sufficiently supported. A separate standard covering Woodruff keys, keyslots, and cutters (B17f-1930) was reaffirmed in 1955. In 1962 the USA Standards Committee B17 was reactivated, and a subcommittee developed this standard based on current industry practice; it was approved on 15 September 1967 and designated B17.1-1967.
Equally important is what the standard does not cover: involute and straight-sided splines (governed by the B92 series), pin joints and interference fits, fatigue assessment of keyed shafts, and material selection for high-temperature, corrosive, or very high-speed duty. Strength verification must be performed separately, while the dimensions and tolerances are taken from this standard.
The definitions clause of the standard separates terms that are very often confused, and everything that follows depends on getting them right:
Other variants encountered in practice include the Pratt & Whitney key (semicircular ends, tolerates some axial adjustment) and the feather key (fixed to the shaft while the hub slides along it). All of them inherit the width–height–depth relationships established by this standard.
| Key Type | Torque Mechanism | Assembly Character | Typical Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parallel key (square / flat) | Side bearing plus shear | Removable, withdrawn axially | Gear reducers, pumps, fans, motor shaft extensions |
| Taper key (1:100) | Top-face wedging plus side bearing | Driven in; harder to remove | Heavy and shock loads, older equipment |
| Gib-head taper key | As above, with a projecting head | Removable via the head | Large sheaves, flywheels |
| Woodruff key | Side bearing, self-aligning | Easy to fit; shallow seat | Small shafts, tapered ends, instruments |
| Feather key | Key fixed to shaft, hub slides | Permits axial sliding | Sliding gears, clutches |
Table 1 of the standard establishes the “key size versus shaft diameter” relationship and is by far its most frequently used content. The principle is straightforward: key width increases in steps as shaft diameter increases, and within a given diameter band either a square key (width equal to height) or a slightly shallower rectangular key may be used, giving designers flexibility when hub wall thickness is limited or when the depth of the keyseat has become the fatigue-critical feature of the shaft. The table below lists the customary inch bands together with approximate metric equivalents.
| Shaft Diameter Range (in) | Key Width b × Height h (in) | Approx. Metric (mm) | Typical Duty |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5/16 – 7/16 | 3/32 × 3/32 | 2.4 × 2.4 | Instrument shafts, small motors |
| 7/16 – 9/16 | 1/8 × 1/8 | 3.2 × 3.2 | Small reducers, fans |
| 9/16 – 7/8 | 3/16 × 3/16 | 4.8 × 4.8 | General pump and line shafts |
| 7/8 – 1 1/4 | 1/4 × 1/4 | 6.4 × 6.4 | Medium motor shaft extensions |
| 1 1/4 – 1 3/8 | 5/16 × 5/16 | 7.9 × 7.9 | Reducer input shafts |
| 1 3/8 – 1 3/4 | 3/8 × 3/8 | 9.5 × 9.5 | Sheaves, sprockets |
| 1 3/4 – 2 1/4 | 1/2 × 1/2 | 12.7 × 12.7 | Medium industrial drives |
| 2 1/4 – 2 3/4 | 5/8 × 5/8 | 15.9 × 15.9 | Mill auxiliary drives, heavy pumps |
| 2 3/4 – 3 1/4 | 3/4 × 3/4 | 19.1 × 19.1 | Large couplings |
| 3 1/4 – 3 3/4 | 7/8 × 7/8 | 22.2 × 22.2 | Mining and metallurgical equipment |
| 3 3/4 – 4 1/2 | 1 × 1 | 25.4 × 25.4 | Heavy reducers |
| 4 1/2 – 5 1/2 | 1 1/4 × 1 1/4 | 31.8 × 31.8 | Rolling mills, marine shafting |
Metric drawings, which dominate in many regions, use the same stepping pattern as ISO 773 and DIN 6885-1, and can be cross-referenced to the inch system of B17.1. The following table gives the customary metric correspondence so that key and keyseat depths can be taken quickly for a metric shaft diameter.
| Shaft Diameter (mm) | Key b × h (mm) | Shaft Keyseat Depth t1 (mm) | Hub Keyseat Depth t2 (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 – 8 | 2 × 2 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 8 – 10 | 3 × 3 | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 10 – 12 | 4 × 4 | 2.5 | 1.8 |
| 12 – 17 | 5 × 5 | 3.0 | 2.3 |
| 17 – 22 | 6 × 6 | 3.5 | 2.8 |
| 22 – 30 | 8 × 7 | 4.0 | 3.3 |
| 30 – 38 | 10 × 8 | 5.0 | 3.3 |
| 38 – 44 | 12 × 8 | 5.0 | 3.3 |
| 44 – 50 | 14 × 9 | 5.5 | 3.8 |
| 50 – 58 | 16 × 10 | 6.0 | 4.3 |
| 58 – 65 | 18 × 11 | 7.0 | 4.4 |
| 65 – 75 | 20 × 12 | 7.5 | 4.9 |
| 75 – 85 | 22 × 14 | 9.0 | 5.4 |
| 85 – 95 | 25 × 14 | 9.0 | 5.4 |
The standard treats the three key dimensions very differently, and that asymmetry is the key to understanding the whole fit system:
For parallel keys the standard recognizes two assembly fit classes. The Class 1 fit is looser, with a definite clearance between key width and keyseat width; it eases hand assembly, tolerates slight misalignment, and suits general drives, frequently dismantled parts, and axially sliding hubs. The Class 2 fit is closer, with minimal clearance or a transition condition; it is used for reversing duty, shock loads, precision drives, and cases where fretting must be suppressed. Taper keys have their own wedging provisions: after driving, the top face should seat against the bottom of the hub keyway.
| Item | Class 1 Fit (loose) | Class 2 Fit (close) |
|---|---|---|
| Key width vs. keyseat width | Definite clearance | Small clearance or transition |
| Assembly method | Push in by hand | Light tapping or pressing |
| Top clearance | About 0.005–0.015 in | About 0.005–0.010 in |
| Load behavior | Even side contact, moderate shock resistance | Large contact area, good shock and fretting resistance |
| Typical use | General reducers, pumps, fans, dismantled parts | Reversing, shock, precision, servo shafts |
Depth control is the most practically valuable part of the standard. Two symbols describe depth: T for the keyseat depth in the shaft and S for the keyseat depth in the hub. Together with key height h they must satisfy S + T = h + top clearance. For square keys, T = S = h/2 is customary; for rectangular keys the split follows Table 3, generally with T slightly larger and S slightly smaller so that adequate bearing height remains on the shaft side.
Because the shaft is cylindrical, measuring from the bottom of the slot to the shaft axis is both awkward and error-prone. The standard therefore introduces the concept of a depth-control dimension: the distance from the bottom of the keyseat to the opposite outside surface of the shaft. For the shaft the depth-control dimension is d − T; for the hub it is d + S. A micrometer or height gauge then suffices, and no tool setting on a curved surface is required.
| Key Size (square, in) | T (shaft depth, in) | S (hub depth, in) | Depth-Control (d − T) Measuring Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1/8 | 1/16 | 1/16 | Measure bottom to opposite OD; average three readings |
| 3/16 | 3/32 | 3/32 | As above; avoid slot-edge burrs |
| 1/4 | 1/8 | 1/8 | Key-width pin helps locate the tool |
| 5/16 | 5/32 | 5/32 | Verify with a depth micrometer |
| 3/8 | 3/16 | 3/16 | Check at several points along long seats |
| 1/2 | 1/4 | 1/4 | Tapered shafts need local diameter conversion |
| 5/8 | 5/16 | 5/16 | Control bottom fillet on large sections |
| 3/4 | 3/8 | 3/8 | Check surface finish of fitting faces too |
| 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | Use dedicated gauges for heavy parts |
Three inspection methods are common. First, a vernier or micrometer depth gauge reads T and S directly. Second, a cylindrical gauge pin sized to the key width b is laid in the seat and the distance from the top of the pin to the opposite side of the shaft is measured and converted; this method also reflects the quality of the bottom radius. Third, in batch production, a dedicated keyseat caliper or limit gauge gives a go/no-go verdict. The pin method best reflects the assembled condition and is preferred for taper keys and tapered shafts.
Keyseat quality directly affects shaft fatigue life. The standard addresses keyseat edge chamfers, key end radii, and the parallelism of keyseat side faces to the shaft axis (Tables 7 and 6):
Dimensional conformance is only the starting point; a strength check is still required. Keyed joints are normally verified against two failure modes, shear and bearing (crushing):
F = 2M / d → τ = F / (b · L) → σ = F / (t · L)
where M is transmitted torque, d shaft diameter, F the tangential force on the key, b key width, L effective key length, and t the effective bearing height (h/2 for a square key). Worked example: shaft d = 50 mm, torque M = 500 N·m, key 14 × 9 × 60 in 45 steel. Then F = 2 × 500 / 0.05 = 20 kN; shear area A = 14 × 60 = 840 mm², so τ ≈ 23.8 MPa; bearing area Ab = 4.5 × 60 = 270 mm², so σ ≈ 74 MPa. With allowable bearing stress of roughly 100–150 MPa and allowable shear of roughly 60–90 MPa for a 45-steel key under static load, the key is adequate; for shock duty, reduce the allowables by a factor of about 0.7 and recalculate.