Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
With the relentless advancement of large-scale integration in integrated circuits and the miniaturization of electronic components, thermosetting resin-based materials — particularly epoxy formulations — have become the cornerstone of power electronics device encapsulation. These materials provide excellent electrical insulation, thermal management, and mechanical protection. However, a critical failure mode emerges at low temperatures: brittleness-induced cracking of the encapsulant, which can compromise device reliability and lead to field failures.
ISO/TS 25336:2025 addresses this challenge by introducing a quantitative test method: the embedded metal block method. This technique simulates real encapsulation structures by pre-embedding a carefully designed stress module within a thermosetting resin specimen, then subjecting it to controlled cooling until cracks initiate at predetermined stress concentration points.
The test requires several specialized pieces of equipment, each with specific performance thresholds:
| Equipment | Specification | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Vacuum drying oven | Min. pressure ≤ 100 Pa | Degassing the resin compound to eliminate气泡 |
| Vacuum batching plant | Min. pressure ≤ 100 Pa | Mixing resin, curing agent and fillers under vacuum |
| Drying oven | Must meet required cure temperature/time | Curing the resin compound |
| Temperature test chamber | Min. -70 °C, ramp rate 0.1–0.3 °C/min | Controlled cooling for crack detection |
The mould is a three-piece assembly consisting of a cavity plate and two covering plates, each 10.0 ± 0.1 mm thick. The cavity plate is square (140.0 mm side) with a central cylindrical cavity 100.00 mm in diameter. A casting gate at the upper edge facilitates resin injection. The mould material — typically tool steels such as 35CrMo7 or P20 — must achieve a surface roughness of Ra 1.6 to ensure proper demoulding and consistent specimen quality.
The stress module is the key innovation in this test method. It is a quadrilateral metal plate, 10.0 mm thick, with four chamfered corners. The critical feature is the stress angle — the smallest chamfer with a radius of 2.0 ± 0.05 mm — which serves as the crack initiation site. Two to three positioning holes ensure consistent placement within the mould cavity.
The preparation process follows a rigorous sequence: preheat the mould at 100 °C for at least 2 hours, prepare the thermosetting resin compound (resin + curing agent + optional fillers/tougheners/accelerators) under vacuum stirring, cast into the preheated mould under vacuum (100–300 Pa), then cure according to the product specification. After cooling, the specimen is demoulded and inspected for visible defects.
Rather than directly cooling to failure, the test employs a clever two-stage strategy:
Stage 1 — Preliminary test: Two specimens are cooled at 1 K/min from 30 °C. The temperature at which the first crack appears at any stress angle is recorded as T₀ (the highest cracking temperature).
Stage 2 — Cracking temperature test: The chamber starts at T₀ + 20 °C. Multiple specimens are held for 30 minutes, then cooled at 0.05–0.1 K/min — a much slower rate to accurately resolve the cracking temperature. Each specimen’s cracking temperature Tckᵢ is recorded.
The CR value quantifies crack resistance as:
CR = Σ(T − Tckᵢ) / (n × T)
Where T = 25 °C (laboratory room temperature), Tckᵢ is the cracking temperature of the i-th sample, and n is the number of specimens (minimum 3). A higher CR value indicates better crack resistance — the material cracks at lower temperatures, further from room temperature.
From a practical engineering standpoint, several aspects of ISO/TS 25336 deserve special attention:
1. Material formulation matters: The standard explicitly allows for fillers, tougheners, and accelerators in the compound. This means the test can be used to optimize formulations — for instance, comparing the effect of adding 5% vs. 10% silica filler on crack resistance.
2. Cooling rate sensitivity: The slow cooling rate in Stage 2 (0.05–0.1 K/min) is deliberately chosen to avoid thermal shock effects that would confound the measurement. Engineers should be aware that faster cooling in real applications may cause cracking at higher temperatures than the CR index suggests.
3. Statistical treatment: The standard notes that “the cracking temperature variability of parallel specimens is significant” due to the brittle nature of these materials. A minimum of 3 specimens is recommended, but for high-stakes applications (e.g., automotive power modules), 5–10 specimens would provide more statistically robust data.